Literature DB >> 23054770

Predicting the sensitivity of fishes to dioxin-like compounds: possible role of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) ligand binding domain.

Jon A Doering1, John P Giesy, Steve Wiseman, Markus Hecker.   

Abstract

Dioxin-like compounds are chronically toxic to most vertebrates. However, dramatic differences in sensitivity to these chemicals exist both within and among vertebrate classes. A recent study found that in birds, critical amino acid residues in the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) ligand binding domain are predictive of sensitivity to dioxin-like compounds in a range of species. It is currently unclear whether similar predictive relationships exist for fishes, a group of animals at risk of exposure to dioxin-like compounds. Effects of dioxin-like compounds are mediated through the AhR in fishes and birds. However, AhR dynamics are more complex among fishes. Fishes possess AhRs that can be grouped within at least three distinct clades (AhR1, AhR2, AhR3) with each clade possibly containing multiple isoforms. AhR2 has been shown to be the active form in most teleosts, with AhR1 not binding dioxin-like compounds. The role of AhR3 in dioxin-like toxicity has not been established to date and this clade is only known to be expressed in some cartilaginous fishes. Furthermore, multiple mechanisms of sensitivity to dioxin-like compounds that are not relevant in birds could exist among fishes. Although, at this time, deficiencies exist for the development of such a predictive relationship for application to fishes, successfully establishing such relationships would offer a substantial improvement in assessment of risks of dioxin-like compounds for this class of vertebrates. Elucidation of such relationships would provide a mechanistic foundation for extrapolation among species to allow the identification of the most sensitive fishes, with the ultimate goal of the prediction of risk posed to endangered species that are not easily studied.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23054770     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-012-1203-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  33 in total

1.  Identification of zebrafish ARNT1 homologs: 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin toxicity in the developing zebrafish requires ARNT1.

Authors:  Amy L Prasch; Robert L Tanguay; Vatsal Mehta; Warren Heideman; Richard E Peterson
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2005-11-23       Impact factor: 4.436

2.  Cloning and characterization of the zebrafish (Danio rerio) aryl hydrocarbon receptor.

Authors:  R L Tanguay; C C Abnet; W Heideman; R E Peterson
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1999-01-18

3.  Characteristics of PAHs, PCDD/Fs and PCBs in sediment following forest fires in northern Alberta.

Authors:  S Gabos; M G Ikonomou; D Schopflocher; B R Fowler; J White; E Prepas; D Prince; W Chen
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 7.086

4.  Toxic effects of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) in developing red seabream (Pagrus major) embryo: an association of morphological deformities with AHR1, AHR2 and CYP1A expressions.

Authors:  Masanobu Yamauchi; Eun-Young Kim; Hisato Iwata; Yasuhiro Shima; Shinsuke Tanabe
Journal:  Aquat Toxicol       Date:  2006-09-20       Impact factor: 4.964

5.  Heart malformation is an early response to TCDD in embryonic zebrafish.

Authors:  Dagmara S Antkiewicz; C Geoffrey Burns; Sara A Carney; Richard E Peterson; Warren Heideman
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2005-01-05       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 6.  Cytochrome P450 gene regulation and physiological functions mediated by the aryl hydrocarbon receptor.

Authors:  Kaname Kawajiri; Yoshiaki Fujii-Kuriyama
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  2007-04-13       Impact factor: 4.013

7.  Assessment of sediment contamination in Casco Bay, Maine, USA.

Authors:  Terry L Wade; Stephen T Sweet; Andrew G Klein
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2007-09-05       Impact factor: 8.071

8.  Repression of aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) signaling by AHR repressor: role of DNA binding and competition for AHR nuclear translocator.

Authors:  Brad R Evans; Sibel I Karchner; Lenka L Allan; Richard S Pollenz; Robert L Tanguay; Matthew J Jenny; David H Sherr; Mark E Hahn
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2007-11-13       Impact factor: 4.436

9.  Functional properties of the four Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) aryl hydrocarbon receptor type 2 (AHR2) isoforms.

Authors:  Maria C Hansson; Mark E Hahn
Journal:  Aquat Toxicol       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 4.964

10.  Aryl hydrocarbon receptor signaling in rainbow trout hepatocytes: role of hsp90 and the proteasome.

Authors:  Steve B Wiseman; Mathilakath M Vijayan
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2007-06-09       Impact factor: 3.228

View more
  5 in total

1.  In Silico Site-Directed Mutagenesis Informs Species-Specific Predictions of Chemical Susceptibility Derived From the Sequence Alignment to Predict Across Species Susceptibility (SeqAPASS) Tool.

Authors:  Jon A Doering; Sehan Lee; Kurt Kristiansen; Linn Evenseth; Mace G Barron; Ingebrigt Sylte; Carlie A LaLone
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Potential Toxicity of Complex Mixtures in Surface Waters from a Nationwide Survey of United States Streams: Identifying in Vitro Bioactivities and Causative Chemicals.

Authors:  Brett R Blackwell; Gerald T Ankley; Paul M Bradley; Keith A Houck; Sergei S Makarov; Alexander V Medvedev; Joe Swintek; Daniel L Villeneuve
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  AHR-related activities in a creosote-adapted population of adult atlantic killifish, Fundulus heteroclitus, two decades post-EPA superfund status at the Atlantic Wood Site, Portsmouth, VA USA.

Authors:  Josephine V Wojdylo; Wolfgang Vogelbein; Lisa J Bain; Charles D Rice
Journal:  Aquat Toxicol       Date:  2016-05-22       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 4.  Building and Applying Quantitative Adverse Outcome Pathway Models for Chemical Hazard and Risk Assessment.

Authors:  Edward J Perkins; Roman Ashauer; Lyle Burgoon; Rory Conolly; Brigitte Landesmann; Cameron Mackay; Cheryl A Murphy; Nathan Pollesch; James R Wheeler; Anze Zupanic; Stefan Scholz
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 3.742

5.  Xenobiotic metabolism and its physiological consequences in high-Antarctic Notothenioid fishes.

Authors:  Anneli Strobel; Roger Lille-Langøy; Helmut Segner; Patricia Burkhardt-Holm; Anders Goksøyr; Odd André Karlsen
Journal:  Polar Biol       Date:  2021-12-26       Impact factor: 2.310

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.