Literature DB >> 23054559

Minimally invasive surgery for valvular heart disease.

Daniel G Cuadrado1, Marzia Leacche, John G Byrne.   

Abstract

OPINION STATEMENT: Valvular heart disease imposes varying degrees of stress on the myocardium, which, untreated, leads to eventual ventricular dysfunction. The pathophysiologic mechanisms by which these lesions act depend not only on the affected valve, but also the degree to which they causes stenosis, regurgitation, or both. The goal of patient treatment is to identify and correct the defect before irreversible ventricular changes have occurred. Historically, the conventional surgical approach for valvular disease was via median sternotomy. Minimally invasive valve surgery (MIVS) refers to alternative surgical techniques, which avoid the trans-sternal approach. The objective is to (1) minimize surgical trauma, (2) reduce blood utilization, and (3) hasten postoperative convalesce. These goals are accomplished through the use of partial sternal, para-sternal, or thoracotomy incisions and can be adapted to robotic technologies. As with all evolving surgical techniques, the therapeutic aim of valve repair or replacement must be performed at or above the same standard of conventional surgery. Outcomes must not be sacrificed for the sake of better cosmesis. In addition, percutaneous catheter-based valvular interventions have seen rapid advances. These emerging technologies have dramatically broadened the therapeutic options, especially for an ever-increasing group of high-risk patients. As expected with all minimally invasive techniques, the major differences in the hard outcomes of mortality and major morbidity are seen in these highest risk groups. However, intermediate and low risk patients receive a tremendous benefit with regard to shortened hospital stay and quicker functional recovery. With the myriad of interventional options now available, the clinical challenge now is how best to individualize the treatment approach to a given patient providing the most durable result in order to alleviate symptoms and preserve myocardial function.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 23054559     DOI: 10.1007/s11936-012-0211-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med        ISSN: 1092-8464


  43 in total

1.  Aortic stenosis: even mild disease is significant.

Authors:  Catherine M Otto
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 29.983

2.  Port-access cardiac operations with cardioplegic arrest.

Authors:  J I Fann; M F Pompili; J H Stevens; L C Siegel; F G St Goar; T A Burdon; B A Reitz
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients.

Authors:  Craig R Smith; Martin B Leon; Michael J Mack; D Craig Miller; Jeffrey W Moses; Lars G Svensson; E Murat Tuzcu; John G Webb; Gregory P Fontana; Raj R Makkar; Mathew Williams; Todd Dewey; Samir Kapadia; Vasilis Babaliaros; Vinod H Thourani; Paul Corso; Augusto D Pichard; Joseph E Bavaria; Howard C Herrmann; Jodi J Akin; William N Anderson; Duolao Wang; Stuart J Pocock
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-06-05       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Sudden death in mitral regurgitation due to flail leaflet.

Authors:  F Grigioni; M Enriquez-Sarano; L H Ling; K R Bailey; J B Seward; A J Tajik; R L Frye
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Minimally invasive mitral valve operations.

Authors:  J L Navia; D M Cosgrove
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Echocardiographically documented mitral-valve prolapse. Long-term follow-up of 237 patients.

Authors:  R A Nishimura; M D McGoon; C Shub; F A Miller; D M Ilstrup; A J Tajik
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1985-11-21       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  The myxomatous mitral valve and sudden death.

Authors:  E Chesler; R A King; J E Edwards
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Robotic mitral valve repairs in 300 patients: a single-center experience.

Authors:  W Randolph Chitwood; Evelio Rodriguez; Michael W A Chu; Ansar Hassan; T Bruce Ferguson; Paul W Vos; L Wiley Nifong
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  Natural history of the asymptomatic/minimally symptomatic patient with severe mitral regurgitation secondary to mitral valve prolapse and normal right and left ventricular performance.

Authors:  S E Rosen; J S Borer; C Hochreiter; P Supino; M J Roman; R B Devereux; P Kligfield; J Bucek
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1994-08-15       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Safety of minimally invasive mitral valve surgery without aortic cross-clamp.

Authors:  Ramanan Umakanthan; Marzia Leacche; Michael R Petracek; Sathappan Kumar; Nataliya V Solenkova; Clayton A Kaiser; James P Greelish; Jorge M Balaguer; Rashid M Ahmad; Stephen K Ball; Steven J Hoff; Tarek S Absi; Betty S Kim; John G Byrne
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.330

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.