Literature DB >> 23054523

Short-keeled cemented tibial components show an increased risk for aseptic loosening.

Christian Ries1, Markus Heinichen, Florian Dietrich, Eike Jakubowitz, Christian Sobau, Christian Heisel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The choice of implant design plays an important role for primary fixation of a TKA. Short-keeled tibial components allow implantation through a smaller approach with less femorotibial subluxation. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purpose of this study was to detect early implant failure resulting from aseptic loosening after cemented short-keeled and standard tibial baseplate implantation.
METHODS: Between 2008 and 2010, a group of 160 consecutive patients (with 80 standard and with 80 short-keeled tibial trays) received cemented TKAs. At 1-year followup, patients were examined clinically and radiographs were analyzed regarding aspects of radiolucency. The components were divided into five zones on each radiographic view and the measurements of the 10 zones were added.
RESULTS: The mean sum of radiolucencies was increased significantly with the short-keeled baseplates. In the current study, short-keeled tibial trays revealed a revision rate of 6.3% after 1-year followup. In contrast, none of the standard tibial baseplates were revised.
CONCLUSIONS: The implantation of cemented, short-keeled tibial components is linked to an increased rate of early loosening. Therefore, the indication for cemented, short-keeled component implantation should be reviewed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23054523      PMCID: PMC3563801          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-012-2630-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  28 in total

1.  Influence of surface finish in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Bradley K Vaughn; Elizabeth Fuller; Rebekah Peterson; Susan G Capps
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  The cemented unicondylar knee arthroplasty. An in vitro comparison of three cement techniques.

Authors:  C Miskovsky; L A Whiteside; S E White
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: a 10-feature evolutionary approach.

Authors:  Peter M Bonutti; Michael A Mont; Mark A Kester
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.472

4.  Early failure of precoated femoral components in primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Alvin Ong; Kirk L Wong; Max Lai; Jonathan P Garino; Marvin E Steinberg
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  The cement mantle in total hip arthroplasty. Analysis of long-term radiographic results.

Authors:  E Ebramzadeh; A Sarmiento; H A McKellop; A Llinas; W Gogan
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Fixation of tibial components of knee prostheses.

Authors:  P S Walker; D Greene; D Reilly; J Thatcher; M Ben-Dov; F C Ewald
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  A comparative evaluation of tibial component designs of total knee prostheses.

Authors:  J L Lewis; M J Askew; D P Jaycox
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Long-term followup of the Miller-Galante total knee replacement.

Authors:  R A Berger; A G Rosenberg; R M Barden; M B Sheinkop; J J Jacobs; J O Galante
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: the results justify its use.

Authors:  Richard S Laskin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Micromotion secondary to axial, torsional, and shear loads in two models of cementless tibial components.

Authors:  W J Kraemer; I J Harrington; T C Hearn
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.757

View more
  10 in total

1.  The effect of obesity on mechanical failure after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Stanislas Gunst; Michel-Henri Fessy
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-11

2.  Comparative retrieval analysis of a novel anatomic tibial tray backside: alterations in tibial component design and surface coating can increase cement adhesions and surface roughness.

Authors:  Dominic T Mathis; Joshua Schmidli; Felix Amsler; Johann Henckel; Harry Hothi; Alister Hart; Michael T Hirschmann
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 2.562

3.  The effect of implant size difference on patient outcomes and failure after bilateral simultaneous total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Alex Tang; David Yeroushalmi; Stephen Zak; Katherine Lygrisse; Ran Schwarzkopf; Morteza Meftah
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-06-13

4.  CORR Insights®: Higher Risk of Loosening for a Four-Pegged TKA Tibial Baseplate Than for a Stemmed One: A Register-based Study.

Authors:  Robert Namba
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 4.755

5.  Does Knee Prosthesis Survivorship Improve When Implant Designs Change? Findings from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.

Authors:  Peter L Lewis; Stephen E Graves; Richard N de Steiger; David G Campbell; Yi Peng; Alesha Hatton; Michelle Lorimer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 4.755

6.  Prophylactic Tibial Stem Fixation in the Obese: Comparative Early Results in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Joshua T Steere; Michael C Sobieraj; Christopher J DeFrancesco; Craig L Israelite; Charles L Nelson; Atul F Kamath
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2018-09-01

7.  Analysis of the Attune tibial tray backside: A comparative retrieval study.

Authors:  A Cerquiglini; J Henckel; H Hothi; P Allen; J Lewis; A Eskelinen; J Skinner; M T Hirschmann; A J Hart
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 5.853

8.  Does tibial design modification improve implant stability for total knee arthroplasty? An experimental cadaver study.

Authors:  Sebastian Jaeger; Marvin Eissler; Martin Schwarze; Mareike Schonhoff; J Philippe Kretzer; Rudi G Bitsch
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 4.410

Review 9.  No difference between mobile and fixed bearing in primary total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Filippo Migliorini; Nicola Maffulli; Francesco Cuozzo; Marco Pilone; Karen Elsner; Jörg Eschweiler
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 4.114

10.  Early aseptic loosening of a mobile-bearing total knee replacement.

Authors:  Ines Kutzner; Geir Hallan; Paul Johan Høl; Ove Furnes; Øystein Gøthesen; Wender Figved; Peter Ellison
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 3.717

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.