PURPOSE: To compare the measurement precision and related properties between the 5-level EuroQoL Group's 5-dimension (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B) questionnaire in assessing breast cancer patients. METHODS: An observational study of 269 Singaporean breast cancer patients. To compare discriminative ability and responsiveness, the effect sizes (in standard deviation) of the EQ-5D-5L and the FACT-B in relation to health indicators and the change in performance status or quality of life were estimated. Test-retest reliability was examined using the intraclass correlation (ICC). RESULTS: Using performance status, evidence of disease, and treatment status as the criteria, the differences (FACT-B minus EQ-5D-5L) in the effect size for discriminative ability were negative or closed to zero, and the 90% confidence intervals totally fell within the zone that indicated the non-inferiority of the EQ-5D-5L. For responsiveness and test-retest reliability, the confidence intervals of the differences in effect size and ICC overlapped the non-inferiority margin; thus, non-inferiority in these two aspects could neither be confirmed nor rejected. CONCLUSIONS: The EQ-5D-5L was non-inferior to the FACT-B in discriminating breast cancer patients with different health conditions cross-sectionally. The EQ-5D-5L serves as a reasonable alternative or supplementary instrument to the FACT-B in assessing breast cancer patients' health outcomes.
PURPOSE: To compare the measurement precision and related properties between the 5-level EuroQoL Group's 5-dimension (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B) questionnaire in assessing breast cancerpatients. METHODS: An observational study of 269 Singaporean breast cancerpatients. To compare discriminative ability and responsiveness, the effect sizes (in standard deviation) of the EQ-5D-5L and the FACT-B in relation to health indicators and the change in performance status or quality of life were estimated. Test-retest reliability was examined using the intraclass correlation (ICC). RESULTS: Using performance status, evidence of disease, and treatment status as the criteria, the differences (FACT-B minus EQ-5D-5L) in the effect size for discriminative ability were negative or closed to zero, and the 90% confidence intervals totally fell within the zone that indicated the non-inferiority of the EQ-5D-5L. For responsiveness and test-retest reliability, the confidence intervals of the differences in effect size and ICC overlapped the non-inferiority margin; thus, non-inferiority in these two aspects could neither be confirmed nor rejected. CONCLUSIONS: The EQ-5D-5L was non-inferior to the FACT-B in discriminating breast cancerpatients with different health conditions cross-sectionally. The EQ-5D-5L serves as a reasonable alternative or supplementary instrument to the FACT-B in assessing breast cancerpatients' health outcomes.
Authors: Chun Fan Lee; Raymond Ng; Nan Luo; Nan Soon Wong; Yoon Sim Yap; Soo Kien Lo; Whay Kuang Chia; Alethea Yee; Lalit Krishna; Celest Wong; Cynthia Goh; Yin Bun Cheung Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2012-06-06 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: M J Brady; D F Cella; F Mo; A E Bonomi; D S Tulsky; S R Lloyd; S Deasy; M Cobleigh; G Shiomoto Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1997-03 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: J Bernhard; D F Cella; A S Coates; L Fallowfield; P A Ganz; C M Moinpour; P Mosconi; D Osoba; J Simes; C Hürny Journal: Stat Med Date: 1998 Mar 15-Apr 15 Impact factor: 2.373
Authors: Barbara L Conner-Spady; Deborah A Marshall; Eric Bohm; Michael J Dunbar; Lynda Loucks; Ammar Al Khudairy; Tom W Noseworthy Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2015-01-03 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Amaia Bilbao; Lidia García-Pérez; Juan Carlos Arenaza; Isidoro García; Gloria Ariza-Cardiel; Elisa Trujillo-Martín; Maria João Forjaz; Jesús Martín-Fernández Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2018-07-05 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Juan Zhu; Xin-Xin Yan; Cheng-Cheng Liu; Hong Wang; Le Wang; Su-Mei Cao; Xian-Zhen Liao; Yun-Feng Xi; Yong Ji; Lin Lei; Hai-Fan Xiao; Hai-Jing Guan; Wen-Qiang Wei; Min Dai; Wanqing Chen; Ju-Fang Shi Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2020-09-15 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: M Moskovitz; K Jao; J Su; M C Brown; H Naik; L Eng; T Wang; J Kuo; Y Leung; W Xu; N Mittmann; L Moody; L Barbera; G Devins; M Li; D Howell; G Liu Journal: Curr Oncol Date: 2019-12-01 Impact factor: 3.677
Authors: Dominik Golicki; Maciej Niewada; Anna Karlińska; Julia Buczek; Adam Kobayashi; M F Janssen; A Simon Pickard Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2014-11-26 Impact factor: 4.147