Literature DB >> 23054463

Lack of association between clopidogrel responsiveness tested using point-of-care assay and prognosis of patients with coronary artery disease.

Petra Paulu1, Pavel Osmancik, Petr Tousek, Marek Minarik, Lucie Benesova, Zuzana Motovska, Frantisek Bednar, Viktor Kocka, Petr Widimsky.   

Abstract

Dual antiplatelet therapy is important treatment modality across the spectrum of coronary artery disease manifestations. However, a significant number of patients do not have a completely effective response to clopidogrel. This study assessed the impact of response after clopidogrel with Verify Now device on prognosis on patients undergoing coronary interventions. Consecutive patients following percutaneous coronary intervention were prospectively enrolled. A loading dose of 600 mg of clopidogrel was administered before or during PCI. Blood samples were drawn within 24 h after clopidogrel administration. The effect of clopidogrel was measured using VerifyNow. All patients were evaluated at 6 months. The primary end-point was the combination of death, MI and stroke. 378 patients (69.3 % men and 30.7 % women) were enrolled. The mean age was 67.2 ± 12.8 years, BMI 28.9 ± 17.7, and 116 patients had diabetes (30.7 %). During the 6-months follow-up 30 patients (7.94 %) experienced a monitored end-point: 12 patients (3.17 %) had MI; five patients (1.32 %) strokes and 15 patients (3.97 %) died. The remaining 248 patients (71.26 %) were end-point free. Factors associated with a poor prognosis were: leukocytes (OR 1.7 [1.2-2.4], p < 0.01), creatinine (OR 1.4 [1.1-2.5], p < 0.05) and at a borderline level the presence of AA allele of gene CYP2C19*2 (OR 2.5 [0.99-4.1], p = 0.052). The results using VerifyNow were similar between both groups (Group End-point: 208.5 ± 85.5, group No end-point 203.1 ± 91.3) and failed to show any prognostic value (OR 1.00 [0.992-1.007], p = 0.9). The measurement of clopidogrel efficacy using VerifyNow had no prognostic value for our unselected cohort of patients after PCI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23054463     DOI: 10.1007/s11239-012-0813-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis        ISSN: 0929-5305            Impact factor:   2.300


  20 in total

Review 1.  Monitoring oral antiplatelet therapy: is it justified?

Authors:  Lawrence Ang; Ehtisham Mahmud
Journal:  Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2008-08-21

Review 2.  Aspirin and clopidogrel resistance: an emerging clinical entity.

Authors:  Thomas H Wang; Deepak L Bhatt; Eric J Topol
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2005-12-19       Impact factor: 29.983

3.  Point-of-care measurement of clopidogrel responsiveness predicts clinical outcome in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention results of the ARMYDA-PRO (Antiplatelet therapy for Reduction of MYocardial Damage during Angioplasty-Platelet Reactivity Predicts Outcome) study.

Authors:  Giuseppe Patti; Annunziata Nusca; Fabio Mangiacapra; Laura Gatto; Andrea D'Ambrosio; Germano Di Sciascio
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Correlation between light transmission aggregometry, VerifyNow P2Y12, and VASP-P platelet reactivity assays following percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Michael A Gaglia; Rebecca Torguson; Rajbabu Pakala; Zhenyi Xue; Gabriel Sardi; William O Suddath; Kenneth M Kent; Lowell F Satler; Augusto D Pichard; Ron Waksman
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 2.279

5.  Effects of clopidogrel in addition to aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation.

Authors:  S Yusuf; F Zhao; S R Mehta; S Chrolavicius; G Tognoni; K K Fox
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-08-16       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  A randomized trial of prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with high platelet reactivity on clopidogrel after elective percutaneous coronary intervention with implantation of drug-eluting stents: results of the TRIGGER-PCI (Testing Platelet Reactivity In Patients Undergoing Elective Stent Placement on Clopidogrel to Guide Alternative Therapy With Prasugrel) study.

Authors:  Dietmar Trenk; Gregg W Stone; Meinrad Gawaz; Adnan Kastrati; Dominick J Angiolillo; Ulrike Müller; Gert Richardt; Joseph A Jakubowski; Franz-Josef Neumann
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  A randomised, blinded, trial of clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients at risk of ischaemic events (CAPRIE). CAPRIE Steering Committee.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-11-16       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Cytochrome p-450 polymorphisms and response to clopidogrel.

Authors:  Jessica L Mega; Sandra L Close; Stephen D Wiviott; Lei Shen; Richard D Hockett; John T Brandt; Joseph R Walker; Elliott M Antman; William Macias; Eugene Braunwald; Marc S Sabatine
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-12-22       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Measuring aspirin resistance, clopidogrel responsiveness, and postprocedural markers of myonecrosis in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Ashesh N Buch; Suman Singh; Probal Roy; Aamir Javaid; Kimberly A Smith; Christopher E George; Augusto D Pichard; Lowell F Satler; Kenneth M Kent; William O Suddath; Ron Waksman
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2007-04-13       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 10.  Impact of CYP2C19 variant genotypes on clinical efficacy of antiplatelet treatment with clopidogrel: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tim Bauer; Heleen J Bouman; Jochem W van Werkum; Neville F Ford; Jurriën M ten Berg; Dirk Taubert
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-08-04
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Assessing Prognosis of Acute Coronary Syndrome in Recent Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Fan Ye; David Winchester; Michael Jansen; Arthur Lee; Burton Silverstein; Carolyn Stalvey; Matheen Khuddus; Joseph Mazza; Steven Yale
Journal:  Clin Med Res       Date:  2019-06

2.  High platelet reactivity affects the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Jun-Jie Zhang; Xiao-Fei Gao; Zhen Ge; Nai-Liang Tian; Zhi-Zhong Liu; Song Lin; Fei Ye; Shao-Liang Chen
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 2.298

Review 3.  Mean platelet volume: a potential biomarker of the risk and prognosis of heart disease.

Authors:  Dong-Hyun Choi; Seong-Ho Kang; Heesang Song
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 2.884

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.