Literature DB >> 23054113

Flap survival of skin-sparing mastectomy type IV: a retrospective cohort study of 75 consecutive cases.

Fabio Santanelli1, Benedetto Longo, Michail Sorotos, Alessio Farcomeni, Guido Paolini.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: High incidence of epidermolysis and full thickness necrosis of Wise-pattern skin-sparing mastectomy (WPM) skin flaps to almost 30% represent the Achilles' heel of this procedure. Our purpose was to investigate potential predictors of skin flap ischemic complications (SFIC) in WPM.
METHODS: A total of 75 immediate prosthetic reconstructions following Wise-pattern mastectomy on 63 patients were retrospectively analyzed to assess risk factors for SFIC and their impact on aesthetic outcomes and patient satisfaction. There were 2 clusters of hypothetic predictors investigated: patient-related (age, body mass index, smoking, neoadjuvant chemotherapy) and procedure-related (implant weight, breast weight, curative-prophylactic procedure, axillary lymph nodes dissection). Significant predictors from univariate and mixed-effects multivariate logistic regression analyses were considered to be important selection criteria that expose the patients to higher risk of SFIC. Moreover, patients were divided into 3 subgroups according to postoperative outcome: (A) group healed uneventfully, (B) with partial thickness, and (C) with full thickness necrosis. Aesthetic evaluations scores of subgroups were analyzed and compared using a Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance, and Dunn's test for multiple comparisons between subgroups.
RESULTS: Smoking and weight of prosthesis >468 g showed significant association with SFIC, additionally analysis of aesthetic evaluations confirmed differences between subgroups (p = 0.001), and multiple testing showed significance between subgroup A and C (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with clinically significant predictors are at higher risk of postoperative SFIC and consequently less satisfied of their aesthetic outcomes. The surgeon should consider alternative procedures for such patients, and prostheses heavier than 468 g should be avoided.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23054113     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-012-2672-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  6 in total

1.  Prophylactic Bilateral Nipple-sparing Mastectomy and a Staged Breast Reconstruction Technique: Preliminary Results.

Authors:  Thierry Tondu; Filip Thiessen; Wiebren A A Tjalma
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Auckl)       Date:  2016-11-09

Review 2.  Mastectomy skin flap necrosis: challenges and solutions.

Authors:  Stuart A Robertson; Johann A Jeevaratnam; Avi Agrawal; Ramsey I Cutress
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press)       Date:  2017-03-13

3.  Wise Pattern Direct Implant Breast Reconstruction: A Review and Improved Outcomes Using Dermal Matrix.

Authors:  Harold I Friedman; Sarah Talebagha; Jarom Gilstrap; Mirsad Mujadzic; Elliott Chen
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-10-16

4.  The Type of Breast Reconstruction May Not Influence Patient Satisfaction in the Chinese Population: A Single Institutional Experience.

Authors:  Benlong Yang; Lin Li; Wenhui Yan; Jiaying Chen; Ying Chen; Zhen Hu; Guangyu Liu; Zhenzhou Shen; Zhimin Shao; Jiong Wu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Dynamic Change of CD34 Level during the Survival Process of Narrow Pedicle Flap.

Authors:  Lijun Wu; Tianlan Zhao; Daojiang Yu; Qi Chen; Wenya Han; Wenyuan Yu; Wei Sun
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Assessment of Mastectomy Skin Flaps for Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  M Radu; C Bordea; A Noditi; A Blidaru
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.