PURPOSE: The association between infectious mononucleosis (IM) and risk of breast cancer is unclear; no prospective studies have examined this relationship. We examined self-reported history and age at IM in relation to risk of invasive breast cancer. METHODS: Self-reported history and age at IM were examined in relation to risk of invasive breast cancer in a large cohort of women, the Nurses' Health Study II (81,807 women followed from 1989 to 2007). Through questionnaires, women were asked whether they ever had IM and if so, at what age. During follow-up, 2,349 cases of invasive breast cancer were documented. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate relative risks (RR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) for the association of IM with breast cancer. RESULTS: The multivariable-adjusted RR for history of IM and risk of invasive breast cancer was 1.00 (95 % CI: 0.90-1.11). Similar null results were obtained when estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor positive and negative tumors were considered separately. There were no clear patterns of association between age at IM and risk of breast cancer: compared to women with no history of IM, those who were ≤15 years old when they had IM were at lower risk (RR: 0.77; 95 % CI: 0.60, 0.97), but there was no association for women who had IM at ages 16-19, 20-24, or 30+. However, an increased RR (1.45; 95 % CI: 1.02-2.04) was observed for women who had IM at ages 25-29. CONCLUSION: Results of this large prospective study do not support a clear association between history of clinical IM and risk of invasive breast cancer.
PURPOSE: The association between infectious mononucleosis (IM) and risk of breast cancer is unclear; no prospective studies have examined this relationship. We examined self-reported history and age at IM in relation to risk of invasive breast cancer. METHODS: Self-reported history and age at IM were examined in relation to risk of invasive breast cancer in a large cohort of women, the Nurses' Health Study II (81,807 women followed from 1989 to 2007). Through questionnaires, women were asked whether they ever had IM and if so, at what age. During follow-up, 2,349 cases of invasive breast cancer were documented. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate relative risks (RR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) for the association of IM with breast cancer. RESULTS: The multivariable-adjusted RR for history of IM and risk of invasive breast cancer was 1.00 (95 % CI: 0.90-1.11). Similar null results were obtained when estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor positive and negative tumors were considered separately. There were no clear patterns of association between age at IM and risk of breast cancer: compared to women with no history of IM, those who were ≤15 years old when they had IM were at lower risk (RR: 0.77; 95 % CI: 0.60, 0.97), but there was no association for women who had IM at ages 16-19, 20-24, or 30+. However, an increased RR (1.45; 95 % CI: 1.02-2.04) was observed for women who had IM at ages 25-29. CONCLUSION: Results of this large prospective study do not support a clear association between history of clinical IM and risk of invasive breast cancer.
Authors: M Bonnet; J M Guinebretiere; E Kremmer; V Grunewald; E Benhamou; G Contesso; I Joab Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 1999-08-18 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Y Yasui; J D Potter; J L Stanford; M A Rossing; M D Winget; M Bronner; J Daling Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2001-01 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: M Garland; D J Hunter; G A Colditz; D L Spiegelman; J E Manson; M J Stampfer; W C Willett Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 1999-11 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Hai Hu; Man-Li Luo; Christine Desmedt; Sheida Nabavi; Sina Yadegarynia; Alex Hong; Panagiotis A Konstantinopoulos; Edward Gabrielson; Rebecca Hines-Boykin; German Pihan; Xin Yuan; Christos Sotiriou; Dirk P Dittmer; Joyce D Fingeroth; Gerburg M Wulf Journal: EBioMedicine Date: 2016-05-21 Impact factor: 8.143