Literature DB >> 23053657

Cancer stem cell markers are associated with adverse biomarker profiles and molecular subtypes of breast cancer.

Julia Y S Tsang1, Yu-Hua Huang, Ming-Hua Luo, Yun-Bi Ni, Siu-Ki Chan, Philip C W Lui, Alex M C Yu, Puay Hoon Tan, Gary M Tse.   

Abstract

Cumulative evidence has demonstrated the presence of cancer stem cells (CSC) in breast cancer and its putative role in cancer progression. Nonetheless, the clinical significance of CSC in breast cancer remains elusive. The underlying reasons could be due to the heterogeneity of breast cancer subtypes as well as different markers used to define breast CSC. In this study, three widely used markers (aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH)1+ and CD24-CD44+) were used to define two populations of CSC in a large cohort of breast cancers. The expressions of these markers were correlated with different clinicopathological features and the molecular subtypes. ALDH1+ breast cancers were associated with basal-like and HER2-overexpressing subtypes and the characteristics histologic features were related to these two subtypes. On the other hand, CD24-CD44+ breast cancers were associated positively with the presence of extensive in situ component, the absence of lymph node involvement, and basal markers, but negatively with HER2. CD24-CD44+ breast cancers were also positively associated with luminal B cancers. As the expression of CSC markers varied among different molecular subtypes and different clinicopathological features, it appeared that each CSC population could have distinct clinical values in different subgroups of breast cancers. For improved prognostication with CSC, combining the analysis of CSC markers would be required. Within the luminal cancers, CSC appeared to identify cancers with poor outcome. The presence of CSC populations was associated with ER-PR+ cancers and tumors expressing basal markers. Basal marker expression can complement with CSC for improved indicator for poor prognosis in luminal breast cancers. For the first time, the possible contribution of CSC to these aggressive luminal cancers was demonstrated. The association of basal features and CSC in luminal cancers also raised the possibility that luminal cancer cells may acquire basal phenotype and CSC properties together during their progression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23053657     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-012-2271-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  35 in total

1.  Targeting cancer stem cell plasticity through modulation of epidermal growth factor and insulin-like growth factor receptor signaling in head and neck squamous cell cancer.

Authors:  Hui Sun Leong; Fui Teen Chong; Pui Hoon Sew; Dawn P Lau; Bernice H Wong; Bin-Tean Teh; Daniel S W Tan; N Gopalakrishna Iyer
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 6.940

2.  Targeting breast cancer stem cells in triple-negative breast cancer using a combination of LBH589 and salinomycin.

Authors:  Masaya Kai; Noriko Kanaya; Shang V Wu; Carlos Mendez; Duc Nguyen; Thehang Luu; Shiuan Chen
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 3.  Prevention of breast cancer by dietary polyphenols-role of cancer stem cells.

Authors:  Hao-Feng Gu; Xue-Ying Mao; Min Du
Journal:  Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 11.176

Review 4.  Cancer stem cell marker glycosylation: Nature, function and significance.

Authors:  Brody W Mallard; Joe Tiralongo
Journal:  Glycoconj J       Date:  2017-06-17       Impact factor: 2.916

5.  Increased Expression of Beige/Brown Adipose Markers from Host and Breast Cancer Cells Influence Xenograft Formation in Mice.

Authors:  Rajan Singh; Meher Parveen; John M Basgen; Sayeda Fazel; Meron F Meshesha; Easter C Thames; Brandis Moore; Luis Martinez; Carolyn B Howard; Laurent Vergnes; Karen Reue; Shehla Pervin
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 5.852

Review 6.  Breast cancer stem cell: the roles and therapeutic implications.

Authors:  Fang Yang; Jing Xu; Lin Tang; Xiaoxiang Guan
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 9.261

7.  Prognosis assessment of CD44+/CD24- in breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jingjing Gu; Dandan Chen; Zhiqiang Li; Yongliang Yang; Zhaoming Ma; Guanhong Huang
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 2.493

8.  Effect of niclosamide on basal-like breast cancers.

Authors:  Angelina I Londoño-Joshi; Rebecca C Arend; Laura Aristizabal; Wenyan Lu; Rajeev S Samant; Brandon J Metge; Bertha Hidalgo; William E Grizzle; Michael Conner; Andres Forero-Torres; Albert F Lobuglio; Yonghe Li; Donald J Buchsbaum
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 6.261

9.  CD44 is prognostic for overall survival in the NCI randomized trial on breast conservation with 25 year follow-up.

Authors:  T Dan; S M Hewitt; N Ohri; D Ly; B P Soule; S L Smith; K Matsuda; C Council; U Shankavaram; M E Lippman; J B Mitchell; K Camphausen; N L Simone
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  LncRNA PART1 Promotes Proliferation and Migration, Is Associated with Cancer Stem Cells, and Alters the miRNA Landscape in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Brianne M Cruickshank; Marie-Claire D Wasson; Justin M Brown; Wasundara Fernando; Jaganathan Venkatesh; Olivia L Walker; Fiorella Morales-Quintanilla; Margaret L Dahn; Dejan Vidovic; Cheryl A Dean; Carter VanIderstine; Graham Dellaire; Paola Marcato
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.