Literature DB >> 23053262

Assessing the in vivo efficacy of biologic antiangiogenic therapies.

Peter M Wilson1, Melissa J LaBonte, Heinz-Josef Lenz.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To review key clinical issues underlying the assessment of in vivo efficacy when using antiangiogenic therapies for cancer treatment.
METHODS: Literature relevant to use of antiangiogenic therapies in cancer was reviewed, with particular emphasis on the assessment of in vivo efficacy of these agents, as well as additional angiogenic factors that could play a role in escape from angiogenesis inhibition.
RESULTS: In order to grow and metastasize, tumors need to continually acquire new blood supplies; therefore, therapeutic inhibition of angiogenesis has become a component of anticancer treatment for many tumor types. Bevacizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody directed at vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A), has shown activity in combination with chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer. Nevertheless, the use of antiangiogenic therapies remains suboptimal; specifically, optimal dose, duration of therapy, and combination of agents remain unknown. Also, at present, it is not possible to determine which patients are most likely to respond to a given form of antiangiogenic therapy. There has been increased recognition of alternative pathways possibly associated with disease progression in patients undergoing antiangiogenic therapy targeted at VEGF-A. Multiligand-targeted antiangiogenic therapies, such as ziv-aflibercept (formerly known as aflibercept, VEGF Trap), are currently undergoing clinical evaluation. Ziv-aflibercept forms monomeric complexes with VEGF-A, VEGF-B, and PlGF, which have a long half-life, allowing optimization of ziv-aflibercept doses and angiogenic blockage.
CONCLUSIONS: Although antiangiogenic therapies have increased treatment options for cancer patients, their use is limited by a lack of established and standardized methodology to evaluate their efficacy in vivo. Circulating endothelial cells, hypertension, and several molecular and imaging-based markers have potential for use as biomarkers in these patients and may better define appropriate patient populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23053262     DOI: 10.1007/s00280-012-1978-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol        ISSN: 0344-5704            Impact factor:   3.333


  10 in total

1.  86/90Y-Based Theranostics Targeting Angiogenesis in a Murine Breast Cancer Model.

Authors:  Emily B Ehlerding; Carolina A Ferreira; Eduardo Aluicio-Sarduy; Dawei Jiang; Hye Jin Lee; Charles P Theuer; Jonathan W Engle; Weibo Cai
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 4.939

2.  A phase II study of AZD2171 (cediranib) in the treatment of patients with acute myeloid leukemia or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome.

Authors:  Ryan Mattison; Alcee Jumonville; Patrick James Flynn; Alvaro Moreno-Aspitia; Charles Erlichman; Betsy LaPlant; Mark B Juckett
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2014-11-19

3.  Translational predictive biomarker analysis of the phase 1b sorafenib and bevacizumab study expansion cohort.

Authors:  Nilofer Azad; Minshu Yu; Ben Davidson; Peter Choyke; Clara C Chen; Bradford J Wood; Aradhana Venkatesan; Ryan Henning; Kathy Calvo; Lori Minasian; Daniel C Edelman; Paul Meltzer; Seth M Steinberg; Christina M Annunziata; Elise C Kohn
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 5.911

4.  Human proangiogenic circulating hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells promote tumor growth in an orthotopic melanoma xenograft model.

Authors:  Julie A Mund; Harlan Shannon; Anthony L Sinn; Shanbao Cai; Haiyan Wang; Kamnesh R Pradhan; Karen E Pollok; Jamie Case
Journal:  Angiogenesis       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 9.596

5.  Flow cytometric analysis of circulating endothelial cells and endothelial progenitors for clinical purposes in oncology: A critical evaluation.

Authors:  Marco Danova; Giuditta Comolli; Mariangela Manzoni; Martina Torchio; Giuliano Mazzini
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-03-18

6.  68Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC PET imaging in breast carcinoma patients.

Authors:  Mike Sathekge; Thabo Lengana; Moshe Modiselle; Mariza Vorster; JanRijn Zeevaart; Alex Maes; Thomas Ebenhan; Christophe Van de Wiele
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Targeted therapies in colorectal cancer-an integrative view by PPPM.

Authors:  Suzanne Hagan; Maria C M Orr; Brendan Doyle
Journal:  EPMA J       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 6.543

Review 8.  Ziv-aflibercept in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Anuj Patel; Weijing Sun
Journal:  Biologics       Date:  2013-12-16

9.  Expression of Potential Cancer Stem Cell Marker ABCG2 is Associated with Malignant Behaviors of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Guang Zhang; Zhongxia Wang; Weihuan Luo; Hongbo Jiao; Junhua Wu; Chunping Jiang
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 2.260

Review 10.  Endothelial cells in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Wu-Zhen Chen; Jing-Xin Jiang; Xiu-Yan Yu; Wen-Jie Xia; Peng-Xin Yu; Ke Wang; Zhi-Yong Zhao; Zhi-Gang Chen
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2019-11-15
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.