Literature DB >> 23053179

KIT D816 mutation associates with adverse outcomes in core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia, especially in the subgroup with RUNX1/RUNX1T1 rearrangement.

Hee-Jin Kim1, Hee Kyung Ahn, Chul Won Jung, Joon Ho Moon, Chang-Hun Park, Ki-O Lee, Sun-Hee Kim, Yeo-Kyeoung Kim, Hyeoung-Joon Kim, Sang Kyun Sohn, Sung Hyun Kim, Won Sik Lee, Kyoung Ha Kim, Yeung-Chul Mun, Hawk Kim, Jinny Park, Woo-Sung Min, Hee-Je Kim, Dong Hwan Dennis Kim.   

Abstract

Core binding factor (CBF)-positive acute myeloid leukemia (AML) presents a favorable prognosis, except for patients with KIT mutation, especially D816 mutation. The current retrospective study attempted to validate a prognostic role of KIT mutation in 121 Korean patients with CBF AML. The study patients consisted of 121 patients with CBF AML (82 patients with RUNX1/RUNX1T1 [67.8 %] and 39 patients with CBFB/MYH11 [32.2 %]) recruited from eight institutions in Korea. All patients received idarubicin plus cytarabine or behenoyl cytosine arabinoside 3 + 7 induction chemotherapy. The KIT gene mutation status was determined by direct sequencing analyses. A KIT mutation was detected in 32 cases (26.4 %) in our series of patients. The KIT mutation was most frequent in exon 17 (n = 18, 14.9 %; n = 16 with D816 mutation), followed by exon 8 (n = 10, 8.3 %). The presence of KIT D816 mutation was associated with adverse outcomes for the event-free survival (p = 0.03) and for the overall survival (p = 0.02). The unfavorable impact of D816 mutation was more prominent when the analysis was confined to the RUNX1/RUNX1T1 subtype. The KIT mutation was detected in 26.4 % of Korean patients with CBF AML. The KIT D816 mutation demonstrated an unfavorable prognostic implication, particularly in the RUNX1/RUNX1T1 subtype.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23053179     DOI: 10.1007/s00277-012-1580-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Hematol        ISSN: 0939-5555            Impact factor:   3.673


  19 in total

1.  High number of additional genetic lesions in acute myeloid leukemia with t(8;21)/RUNX1-RUNX1T1: frequency and impact on clinical outcome.

Authors:  M-T Krauth; C Eder; T Alpermann; U Bacher; N Nadarajah; W Kern; C Haferlach; T Haferlach; S Schnittger
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 11.528

2.  Functional Properties of KIT Mutations Are Associated with Differential Clinical Outcomes and Response to Targeted Therapeutics in CBF Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Authors:  Soheil Meshinchi; Jessica A Pollard; Katherine Tarlock; Todd A Alonzo; Yi-Cheng Wang; Robert B Gerbing; Rhonda Ries; Michael R Loken; Laura Pardo; Tiffany Hylkema; Jason Joaquin; Leela Sarukkai; Susana C Raimondi; Betsy Hirsch; Lillian Sung; Richard Aplenc; Irwin Bernstein; Alan S Gamis
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  Identification of molecular and cytogenetic risk factors for unfavorable core-binding factor-positive adult AML with post-remission treatment outcome analysis including transplantation.

Authors:  J-H Yoon; H-J Kim; J-W Kim; Y-W Jeon; S-H Shin; S-E Lee; B-S Cho; K-S Eom; Y-J Kim; S Lee; C-K Min; S-G Cho; J-W Lee; W-S Min; C-W Park
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 5.483

4.  Both the subtypes of KIT mutation and minimal residual disease are associated with prognosis in core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia: a retrospective clinical cohort study in single center.

Authors:  Wenbing Duan; Xiaohong Liu; Xiaosu Zhao; Jinsong Jia; Jing Wang; Lizhong Gong; Qian Jiang; Ting Zhao; Yu Wang; Xiaohui Zhang; Lanping Xu; Hongxia Shi; Yingjun Chang; Kaiyan Liu; Xiaojun Huang; Yazhen Qin; Hao Jiang
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 3.673

Review 5.  The use of molecular genetics to refine prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Bhavana Bhatnagar; Ramiro Garzon
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.952

6.  Normal karyotype mosaicism in adult AML patients with adverse-risk and undefined karyotype: preliminary report of treatment outcomes after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Jae-Ho Yoon; Hee-Je Kim; Seung-Hwan Shin; Seung-Ah Yahng; Byung-Sik Cho; Ki-Seong Eom; Yoo-Jin Kim; Seok Lee; Chang-Ki Min; Seok-Goo Cho; Dong-Wook Kim; Jong-Wook Lee; Woo-Sung Min; Chong-Won Park
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 7.  The genomic landscape of testicular germ cell tumours: from susceptibility to treatment.

Authors:  Kevin Litchfield; Max Levy; Robert A Huddart; Janet Shipley; Clare Turnbull
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 14.432

8.  Prospective evaluation of prognostic impact of KIT mutations on acute myeloid leukemia with RUNX1-RUNX1T1 and CBFB-MYH11.

Authors:  Yuichi Ishikawa; Naomi Kawashima; Yoshiko Atsuta; Isamu Sugiura; Masashi Sawa; Nobuaki Dobashi; Hisayuki Yokoyama; Noriko Doki; Akihiro Tomita; Toru Kiguchi; Shiro Koh; Heiwa Kanamori; Noriyoshi Iriyama; Akio Kohno; Yukiyoshi Moriuchi; Noboru Asada; Daiki Hirano; Kazuto Togitani; Toru Sakura; Maki Hagihara; Tatsuki Tomikawa; Yasuhisa Yokoyama; Norio Asou; Shigeki Ohtake; Itaru Matsumura; Yasushi Miyazaki; Tomoki Naoe; Hitoshi Kiyoi
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-01-14

9.  Incidences and Prognostic Impact of c-KIT, WT1, CEBPA, and CBL Mutations, and Mutations Associated With Epigenetic Modification in Core Binding Factor Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Multicenter Study in a Korean Population.

Authors:  Sang Hyuk Park; Hyun Ji Lee; In-Suk Kim; Jeong-Eun Kang; Eun Yup Lee; Hyeoung-Joon Kim; Yeo-Kyeoung Kim; Jong-Ho Won; Soo Mee Bang; Hawk Kim; Moo-Kon Song; Joo Seop Chung; Ho-Jin Shin
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 3.464

Review 10.  Class III Receptor Tyrosine Kinases in Acute Leukemia - Biological Functions and Modern Laboratory Analysis.

Authors:  Rimma Berenstein
Journal:  Biomark Insights       Date:  2015-08-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.