Literature DB >> 23052443

A test of the Whitaker scoring system for estimating age from the bones of the foot.

Catriona Davies1, Lucina Hackman, Sue Black.   

Abstract

Within the literature pertaining to skeletal age estimation, there is a paucity of statistically validated methods of age estimation from the foot. Given the prevalence of recovery of pedal elements in isolation, it is critical that methods exist to facilitate the estimation of age from this anatomical region and that those methods be tested to ensure they are reliable, repeatable and statistically robust. A study was carried out to determine the validity of using the Whitaker method of age estimation from the bones of the foot as a tool in forensic age estimation within a modern Scottish population. Two-hundred and sixty radiographs from individuals aged between birth and 18 years were assessed according to the Whitaker method; the results were compared with chronological age. The results of this study suggest that the method of Whitaker et al. is highly unlikely to estimate the age of females below 16 years of age or males below 18 years of age correctly. When the methodology was altered to correspond with best practice principles of age estimation, the estimated age ranges were found to be too wide to be of practical value in forensic age estimation. The results of this study therefore suggest that the Whitaker method for estimating age from the bones of the foot should not be used in forensic age assessment.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23052443     DOI: 10.1007/s00414-012-0777-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Legal Med        ISSN: 0937-9827            Impact factor:   2.686


  10 in total

1.  The reliability of bone age determination in central European children using the Greulich and Pyle method.

Authors:  R Groell; F Lindbichler; T Riepl; L Gherra; A Roposch; R Fotter
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Age estimation: the state of the art in relation to the specific demands of forensic practise.

Authors:  S Ritz-Timme; C Cattaneo; M J Collins; E R Waite; H W Schütz; H J Kaatsch; H I Borrman
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.686

3.  Forensic age diagnostics of living individuals in criminal proceedings.

Authors:  A Schmeling; A Olze; W Reisinger; F W Rösing; G Geserick
Journal:  Homo       Date:  2003

4.  Scoring system for estimating age in the foot skeleton.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Whitaker; Leslie Rousseau; Trevor Williams; Reed A Rowan; Walter Carl Hartwig
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.868

5.  Carpals and epiphyses of radius and ulna as age indicators.

Authors:  Roberto Cameriere; Luigi Ferrante; Dora Mirtella; Mariano Cingolani
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2005-10-07       Impact factor: 2.686

6.  The impact of economic progress and modernization in medicine on the ossification of hand and wrist.

Authors:  Andreas Schmeling; Ronald Schulz; Bettina Danner; Friedrich W Rösing
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2005-07-13       Impact factor: 2.686

Review 7.  The problem of aging human remains and living individuals: a review.

Authors:  E Cunha; E Baccino; L Martrille; F Ramsthaler; J Prieto; Y Schuliar; N Lynnerup; C Cattaneo
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 2.395

8.  Assessment of skeletal age at the wrist in children with a new ultrasound device.

Authors:  Hans-J Mentzel; Claudia Vilser; Marcus Eulenstein; Tseela Schwartz; Susanna Vogt; Joachim Böttcher; Irit Yaniv; Liat Tsoref; Eberhard Kauf; Werner A Kaiser
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2005-02-24

9.  Comparison of the three age estimation methods: which is more reliable for Turkish children?

Authors:  Bora Büken; Omer Utku Erzengin; Erhan Büken; Alp Alper Safak; Burhan Yazici; Zerrin Erkol
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 2.395

10.  The adolescent growth spurt of boys and girls of the Harpenden growth study.

Authors:  J M Tanner; R H Whitehouse; E Marubini; L F Resele
Journal:  Ann Hum Biol       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 1.533

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.