PURPOSE:Sirolimus and tacrolimus are immunosuppressive compounds that have been used concomitantly in renal transplant patients. Both drugs are dosed orally and have common intestinal and hepatic metabolism and intestinal transport mechanisms. As such, there is a potential for pharmacokinetic drug interaction. METHODS: A single-dose, open-label, four-period, four-treatment, randomized crossover study was conducted in 27 healthy fasting volunteers. Each subject received a 15-mg oral dose of sirolimus alone, a 10-mg oral dose of tacrolimus alone, sirolimus and tacrolimus administered simultaneously, and tacrolimus administered 4 h before sirolimus. Whole blood and plasma samples for sirolimus and tacrolimus testing were analyzed by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. Pharmacokinetic parameters were assessed using noncompartmental methods and were compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA). RESULTS: The geometric mean ratio and 90 % confidence interval (CI) area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUCinf) for sirolimus administered simultaneously with tacrolimus versus sirolimus alone were 97 and 89-106, respectively, and, when administered in a staggered approach versus sirolimus alone, 107 and 98-117, respectively. The geometric mean ratio (%) and 90 % CI AUCinf for tacrolimus administered simultaneously with sirolimus versus tacrolimus alone were 92 and 82-102, respectively, and, when administered in a staggered approach versus tacrolimus alone, 94 and 84-105, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrate a lack of any clinically important drug interaction between sirolimus and tacrolimus in healthy subjects after single-dose administration. However, due to the complexity of anti-rejection immunosuppressive therapy dosing, we suggest that sirolimus and tacrolimus concentration monitoring be performed when changes in dosing are made for either drug regimen.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE:Sirolimus and tacrolimus are immunosuppressive compounds that have been used concomitantly in renal transplant patients. Both drugs are dosed orally and have common intestinal and hepatic metabolism and intestinal transport mechanisms. As such, there is a potential for pharmacokinetic drug interaction. METHODS: A single-dose, open-label, four-period, four-treatment, randomized crossover study was conducted in 27 healthy fasting volunteers. Each subject received a 15-mg oral dose of sirolimus alone, a 10-mg oral dose of tacrolimus alone, sirolimus and tacrolimus administered simultaneously, and tacrolimus administered 4 h before sirolimus. Whole blood and plasma samples for sirolimus and tacrolimus testing were analyzed by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. Pharmacokinetic parameters were assessed using noncompartmental methods and were compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA). RESULTS: The geometric mean ratio and 90 % confidence interval (CI) area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUCinf) for sirolimus administered simultaneously with tacrolimus versus sirolimus alone were 97 and 89-106, respectively, and, when administered in a staggered approach versus sirolimus alone, 107 and 98-117, respectively. The geometric mean ratio (%) and 90 % CI AUCinf for tacrolimus administered simultaneously with sirolimus versus tacrolimus alone were 92 and 82-102, respectively, and, when administered in a staggered approach versus tacrolimus alone, 94 and 84-105, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrate a lack of any clinically important drug interaction between sirolimus and tacrolimus in healthy subjects after single-dose administration. However, due to the complexity of anti-rejection immunosuppressive therapy dosing, we suggest that sirolimus and tacrolimus concentration monitoring be performed when changes in dosing are made for either drug regimen.
Authors: B D Kahan; K L Napoli; P A Kelly; J Podbielski; I Hussein; D L Urbauer; S H Katz; C T Van Buren Journal: Clin Transplant Date: 2000-04 Impact factor: 2.863
Authors: Vivian C McAlister; Kamran Mahalati; Kevork M Peltekian; Albert Fraser; Allan S MacDonald Journal: Ther Drug Monit Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 3.681
Authors: Sung-In Park; Claudia R Felipe; Paula G Pinheiro-Machado; Riberto Garcia; Fernanda B Fernandes; Dulce E Casarini; Helio Tedesco-Silva; Jose O Medina-Pestana Journal: Fundam Clin Pharmacol Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 2.748
Authors: Elly M van Duijnhoven; Johannes M M Boots; Maarten H L Christiaans; Leo M L Stolk; Nasrullah A Undre; Johannes P van Hooff Journal: Transpl Int Date: 2003-06-24 Impact factor: 3.782