Literature DB >> 23052187

Therapy of 1,025 severely ill patients with complicated infections in a German multicenter study: safety profile and efficacy of tigecycline in different treatment modalities.

Klaus-Friedrich Bodmann1, Wolfgang R Heizmann, Christof von Eiff, Christian Petrik, Peter-Andreas Löschmann, Christian Eckmann.   

Abstract

This large prospective non-interventional study investigated the effects of tigecycline either as single agent or in combination with other antimicrobial agents in 1,025 patients treated in clinical routine at German hospitals. Sixty-five percent of the patients had APACHE II scores > 15, indicating high overall disease severity. Complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI) or complicated skin and skin tissue infections (cSSTI) were the most common indications, with Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecium and Escherichia coli being the most frequently isolated pathogens. Clinical success was reported at the end of tigecycline therapy in 74.2% of the total population, in 75.4% of the cIAI and in 82.2% of the cSSTI patients. The subpopulation (28.0% of the patients) infected with multidrug-resistant pathogens (methicillin-resistant S. aureus, extended-spectrum β-lactamase producers and vancomycin-resistant enterococci) were treated with similar success rates as the overall population. Tigecycline was generally well tolerated. Drug-related adverse events (AEs) were reported in 7.7% of the total population; 2.5% had serious AEs mostly attributable to inefficacy of therapy or deterioration of the disease. Mortality rates were consistent with the types of infection and severity of illness. There was no indication of excessive mortality associated with tigecycline as had been suggested in previously performed meta-analyses. In this large non-interventional study performed in the clinical routine setting, tigecycline achieved favorable clinical success rates in a patient population with high severity of illness and a high prevalence of multidrug-resistant pathogens and showed a good safety and tolerability profile.
Copyright © 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23052187     DOI: 10.1159/000342451

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chemotherapy        ISSN: 0009-3157            Impact factor:   2.544


  5 in total

1.  Management of Intra-abdominal Infections due to Carbapenemase-Producing Organisms.

Authors:  Paola Di Carlo; Francesco Vitale; Criostóir O'Súilleabháin; Alessandra Casuccio
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.725

2.  Antagonistic effect between tigecycline and meropenem: successful management of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae infection.

Authors:  Sheng Bi; Xin Yao; Cheng Huang; Xia Zheng; Tianming Xuan; Jifang Sheng; Kaijin Xu; Beiwen Zheng; Qing Yang
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 3.553

3.  Clinical efficacy of tigecycline used as monotherapy or in combination regimens for complicated infections with documented involvement of multiresistant bacteria.

Authors:  W R Heizmann; P-A Löschmann; C Eckmann; C von Eiff; K-F Bodmann; C Petrik
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 3.553

Review 4.  Carbapenem Resistance: A Review.

Authors:  Francis S Codjoe; Eric S Donkor
Journal:  Med Sci (Basel)       Date:  2017-12-21

5.  The Monte Carlo Simulation of Three Antimicrobials for Empiric Treatment of Adult Bloodstream Infections With Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales in China.

Authors:  Dongna Zou; Guangyue Yao; Chengwu Shen; Jinru Ji; Chaoqun Ying; Peipei Wang; Zhiying Liu; Jun Wang; Yan Jin; Yonghong Xiao
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 5.640

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.