Literature DB >> 23051855

Current size criteria for the management of neuroendocrine tumors of the appendix: are they valid? Clinical experience and review of the literature.

S Grozinsky-Glasberg1, K I Alexandraki, D Barak, V Doviner, P Reissman, G A Kaltsas, D J Gross.   

Abstract

We evaluated the latest pathological criteria for completion right hemicolectomy (RHC) in patients with appendiceal neuroendocrine tumors (ANETs) with emphasis on the size of the primary tumor. Data of 28 consecutive patients who underwent RHC for ANETs in three tertiary hospitals were reviewed retrospectively to assess the indications for completion RHC. 10/28 patients were found to have residual disease (36%). In 8/28 patients (29%), the tumor diameter was <1 cm (mean 0.7 ± 0.2 cm, range 0.5-0.9 cm); the indications for RHC included: tumor presence in surgical margins (1 patient), extensive mesoappendiceal invasion (EMI) (1 patient), vascular invasion (VI) (3 patients), Ki-67 ≥2% (3 patients); residual disease was present in 1 patient (3.5%). In 13/28 patients (46%), the tumor diameter was ≥1 and <2 cm (mean 1.30 ± 0.2 cm, range 1.0-1.8 cm); the indications for RHC were: EMI (2 patients), VI (2 patients), Ki-67 ≥2% (2 patients); residual disease was present in 5 patients (18%). In 7/28 patients (25%), the tumor diameter was ≥2 cm (mean 2.5 ± 0.7 cm, range 2.0-4.0 cm). In this final subgroup, RHC was an accepted practice irrespective of other pathologic findings: the tumor was present in surgical margins in 2 patients, in 5 patients VI was demonstrated, and Ki-67 ≥2% was found in 5 patients; residual disease was present in 4 patients (14%). Using the latest European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society criteria for RHC, residual disease may be missed in 18% of ANET patients.
Copyright © 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23051855     DOI: 10.1159/000343801

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroendocrinology        ISSN: 0028-3835            Impact factor:   4.914


  6 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosis and Surgical Treatment of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Shuzo Kohno
Journal:  Cancer Diagn Progn       Date:  2022-03-03

Review 2.  Management of incidentally discovered appendiceal neuroendocrine tumors after an appendicectomy.

Authors:  José Luis Muñoz de Nova; Jorge Hernando; Miguel Sampedro Núñez; Greissy Tibisay Vázquez Benítez; Eva María Triviño Ibáñez; María Isabel Del Olmo García; Jorge Barriuso; Jaume Capdevila; Elena Martín-Pérez
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 5.374

3.  Long-Term Survival is not Impaired After the Complete Resection of Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Appendix.

Authors:  Thomas Steffen; Sabrina M Ebinger; René Warschkow; Cornelia Lüthi; Bruno M Schmied; Thomas Clerici
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  Diagnosis and Management of Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Comprehensive Literature Review.

Authors:  Omid Yazdanpanah; Sarvani Surapaneni; Layla Shanah; Sohaip Kabashneh
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-03-19

5.  Clinical experience in appendiceal neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Authors:  Caglar K Ozcelik; Sevim Turanli; Nazan Bozdogan; Cengiz Dibekoglu
Journal:  Contemp Oncol (Pozn)       Date:  2015-12-22

6.  The risk of lymph node metastases and their impact on survival in patients with appendiceal neuroendocrine neoplasms: a systematic review and meta-analysis of adult and paediatric patients.

Authors:  Kosmas Daskalakis; Krystallenia Alexandraki; Evanthia Kassi; Marina Tsoli; Anna Angelousi; Athanasia Ragkousi; Gregory Kaltsas
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 3.633

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.