Literature DB >> 23051105

Comparison between different biomaterial scaffolds for limbal-derived stem cells growth and enrichment.

Maria Fernanda Forni1, Renata Ruoco Loureiro, Priscila Cardoso Cristovam, Priscila Cristina Cristovam, José Américo Bonatti, Mari Cleide Sogayar, José Álvaro Pereira Gomes.   

Abstract

PURPOSE/AIM: Corneal epithelial stem cells have been used for the treatment of total limbal deficiency with corneal conjunctivalization and decreased vision secondary to a variety of ocular surface diseases. We set to compare the ability of different extracellular components in promoting growth and migration of these cells.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Growth parameters were evaluated, including cell migration and proliferation (by wound healing) and mRNA gene expression (by quantitative RT-PCR).
RESULTS: The growth of corneal epithelial cells plated onto different matrix has shown that all treatments were efficient in supporting exponential growth, with a small increase in the puramatrix and collagen I groups when compared with fibrin treatment, which displayed the best doubling time rate and saturation density. The mRNA relative levels for c-myc, a proliferation marker, were considerably higher in the fibrin-coated group. In a smaller extent, the same could be observed for the puramatrix and collagen I groups. The same pattern could be observed for β-1 and α-6-integrin mRNA relative levels. The levels of CD71 mRNA, a LESC negative marker, were decreased in all groups, with a greater decrease in the fibrin group. We also found that the relative mRNA levels of the efflux pump ABCG2 and ΔNp63 transcripts were significantly higher in the fibrin group but not for collagen and puramatrix groups. Moreover, a diminished capacity of wound repair was observed for the uncoated control while the coated biomaterial groups were able to restore the cell-covered surface at some extent.
CONCLUSION: All components tested were effective in promoting growth of corneal epithelial cells and maintenance of stem cell putative markers when compared with the uncoated surface group. Fibrin was far superior than collagen I and puramatrix in promoting survival, growth and migration of these cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23051105     DOI: 10.3109/02713683.2012.733053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Eye Res        ISSN: 0271-3683            Impact factor:   2.424


  5 in total

1.  Urea-De-Epithelialized Human Amniotic Membrane for Ocular Surface Reconstruction.

Authors:  Francisco Bandeira; Gary Hin-Fai Yam; Matthias Fuest; Hon Shing Ong; Yu-Chi Liu; Xin-Yi Seah; Sunny Y Shen; Jodhbir S Mehta
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 6.940

2.  Bio-fabrication of stem-cell-incorporated corneal epithelial and stromal equivalents from silk fibroin and gelatin-based biomaterial for canine corneal regeneration.

Authors:  Chutirat Torsahakul; Nipan Israsena; Supaporn Khramchantuk; Juthamas Ratanavaraporn; Sirakarnt Dhitavat; Watchareewan Rodprasert; Sirirat Nantavisai; Chenphop Sawangmake
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Labial Mucosa Stem Cells: Isolation, Characterization, and Their Potential for Corneal Epithelial Reconstruction.

Authors:  Kirill E Zhurenkov; Elga I Alexander-Sinkler; Ilya O Gavrilyik; Natalia M Yartseva; Svetlana A Aleksandrova; Tatiana V Mashel; Julia I Khorolskaya; Miralda I Blinova; Alexei N Kulikov; Sergei V Churashov; Valery F Chernysh; Natalia A Mikhailova
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 4.925

Review 4.  Pre-Clinical Cell-Based Therapy for Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency.

Authors:  Amer Sehic; Øygunn Aass Utheim; Kristoffer Ommundsen; Tor Paaske Utheim
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2015-08-28

5.  Optimization of optical and mechanical properties of real architecture for 3-dimensional tissue equivalents: Towards treatment of limbal epithelial stem cell deficiency.

Authors:  Isobel Massie; Alvena K Kureshi; Stefan Schrader; Alex J Shortt; Julie T Daniels
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 8.947

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.