| Literature DB >> 23050072 |
Nurit Firon1, Etan Pressman, Shimon Meir, Reham Khoury, Leviah Altahan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Exposure to higher-than-optimal temperatures reduces crop yield and quality, mainly due to sensitivity of developing pollen grains. The mechanisms maintaining high pollen quality under heat-stress conditions are poorly understood. Our recently published data indicate high heat-stress-induced expression of ethylene-responsive genes in tomato pollen, indicating ethylene involvement in the pollen heat-stress response. Here we elucidated ethylene's involvement in pollen heat-stress response and thermotolerance by assessing the effects of interfering with the ethylene signalling pathway and altering ethylene levels on tomato pollen functioning under heat stress.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23050072 PMCID: PMC3461890 DOI: 10.1093/aobpla/pls024
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AoB Plants Impact factor: 3.276
Effect of heat stress on pollen number and quality of wild-type and Nr mutant tomato plants. Mature pollen grains were collected from wild-type (Pearson) and ethylene receptor mutant (Nr) tomato plants which were exposed for at least 14 days to either control (28/22 °C day/night) or mild chronic heat stress (MCHS; 32/26 °C day/night) conditions. Pollen quality is presented as mean values (n = 4 independent experiments carried out in four summer seasons, at least six biological replicates each) of number of total, viable and non-viable pollen grains per flower.
| Treatment | Number per flower (×103) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Viable | Non-viable (NV) | % NV of total | |||||
| Pearson | Pearson | Pearson | Pearson | |||||
| Control | 81.6a | 73.7a | 77.8a | 70.1a | 3.75b | 3.6b | 4.6 | 4.9 |
| MCHS | 49.5b | 37.7c | 44.6b | 28.3c | 4.95b | 9.5a | 10 | 25 |
In each pollen-quality category (total, viable, non-viable), values followed by different letters are significantly different by multiple comparison Tukey's HSD test (α = 0.05).
Effect of heat stress on starch concentration in pollen grains at different stages of flower development from wild-type and Nr mutant tomato plants. Pollen grains were collected from wild-type (Pearson) and ethylene receptor mutant (Nr) tomato plants exposed for at least 14 days to either control (28/22 °C day/night) or mild chronic heat stress (MCHS; 32/26 °C day/night) conditions. Starch concentrations (mg g DW−1) are presented as mean values of three experimental replicates (n = 3 independent experiments; pooled from at least 50 flowers each). A–n = flower buds n days before anthesis (A = flower opening).
| Pearson | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A-5 | A-3 | A-1 | A | A-5 | A-3 | A-1 | A | |
| Control | 438.6ab | 327.7ab | 214.0ab | 67.1b | 480.0a | 360.5ab | 264.8ab | 96.5b |
| MCHS | 208.2abc | 324.3ab | 234.3abc | 75.2c | 174.1bc | 227.8abc | 369.0a | 101.7c |
Values in a row followed by different letters are significantly different (α = 0.05) by multiple comparison Tukey's HSD test.
Fig. 1Effect of heat stress on levels of sucrose, glucose and fructose in pollen grains of wild-type and Mature pollen grains at anthesis were collected from wild-type (Pearson) and ethylene receptor mutant (Nr) tomato plants which were exposed for at least 14 days to either control (28/22 °C day/night) or mild chronic heat stress (MCHS; 32/26 °C day/night) conditions. Carbohydrate concentrations are presented as mean values ± SE (n = 3 independent experiments; pooled from at least 50 flowers each). In each category (control, black bars; MCHS, white bars), bars with different letters are significantly different by multiple comparison Tukey's HSD test (α = 0.05).
Fig. 2Effect of ethephon and AVG pretreatments of tomato plants on pollen quality following exposure of the plants to short-term heat stress (STHS). (A) and (B) Tomato plants (Micro-Tom) were either pretreated with ethephon (+Eth; 1 p.p.m. for 18 h before HS application) or not pretreated (−Eth). (C) and (D) Tomato plants were either pretreated with AVG (+AVG; 0.3 mM for 4 h before HS application) or not pretreated (−AVG). Short-term heat stress conditions were 2 h exposure to 50 °C. Control (C)—plants maintained at 25 °C. STHS treatment was applied (A) and (C) 3 days before flower opening—developmental stage A-3, or (B) and (D) at anthesis—developmental stage A. ATT—acquired thermotolerance conditions were 1 h exposure to 32 °C followed by 1 h recovery at 25 °C. Acquired thermotolerance conditions were applied prior to HS exposure. Mature pollen grains were collected and pollen quality determined. Data are presented as mean values ± SE (n = 12 biological replicates; collected in two experiments) of number of germinating, viable and non-viable pollen grains per flower. In each pollen-quality category (germinating, black bars; viable, white bars; non-viable, grey bars), bars with different letters are significantly different by multiple comparison Tukey's HSD test (α = 0.05).