Literature DB >> 2304973

Validity of derived measurements of leg-length differences obtained by use of a tape measure.

P Beattie1, K Isaacson, D L Riddle, J M Rothstein.   

Abstract

Determining the difference in the length of an individual's legs is often an important component of a musculoskeletal examination. Although measurements are easily obtained with a tape measure, the validity of these measurements is not known. The purpose of this study was to examine the validity of determinations of leg-length differences (LLDs) obtained by use of a specified tape measure method (TMM). Leg-length differences using the TMM and a radiographic technique were determined for 10 subjects who were candidates for clinical leg-length measurements and for 9 healthy control subjects. Validity of the TMM measurements was determined by assessing the degree of agreement between TMM-obtained LLDs and those obtained by the radiographic method. Validity estimates as determined by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were .770 for patients, .359 for healthy subjects, and .683 for all subjects. When the means of the two values obtained by use of the TMM were compared with the radiographic measurements, the ICCs were .852 for the patient group, .637 for the healthy subjects, and .793 for all subjects. This study suggests that TMM-derived LLD measurements are valid indicators of leg-length inequality and that the estimates of validity are improved by using the average of two determinations rather than a single determination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2304973     DOI: 10.1093/ptj/70.3.150

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Ther        ISSN: 0031-9023


  29 in total

1.  Length and angle measurements of the lower extremity in digital composite overview images.

Authors:  M Boewer; H Arndt; P A W Ostermann; J Petersein; S Mutze
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-05-26       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Heuristic exploration of how leg checking procedures may lead to inappropriate sacroiliac clinical interventions.

Authors:  Robert Cooperstein
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2010-09

3.  Leg length discrepancy in total hip arthroplasty: comparison of two methods of measurement.

Authors:  Arkan S Sayed-Noor; Anders Hugo; Göran O Sjödén; Per Wretenberg
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-08-02       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Methods for assessing leg length discrepancy.

Authors:  Sanjeev Sabharwal; Ajay Kumar
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-04       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Craniocervical chiropractic procedures - a précis of upper cervical chiropractic.

Authors:  H Charles Woodfield; Craig York; Roderic P Rochester; Scott Bales; Mychal Beebe; Bryan Salminen; Jeffrey N Scholten
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2015-06

6.  Downhill walking gait pattern discriminates between types of knee arthroplasty: improved physiological knee functionality in UKA versus TKA.

Authors:  Anatole V Wiik; Adeel Aqil; Sara Tankard; Andrew A Amis; Justin P Cobb
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Comparison of Supine and Prone Methods of Leg Length Inequality Assessment.

Authors:  Robert Cooperstein; Marc Lucente
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2017-03-18

8.  Radiographic parameters improve lower extremity prosthetic alignment.

Authors:  Ryan Mooney; Patrick Carry; Erin Wylie; Abby Schultz; Bryan McNair; Carol Page; Susan Biffl; Travis Heare
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2013-09-28       Impact factor: 1.548

9.  Assessment of glycosaminoglycan content in intervertebral discs of patients with leg length discrepancy: A pilot study.

Authors:  David Latz; Miriam Frenken; Erik Schiffner; Maxime Knautz; Wolfgang Alois Quante; Joachim Windolf; Jan Peter Grassmann; Pascal Jungbluth; Christoph Schleich
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-04-08

10.  Inter-assessor reliability of practice based biomechanical assessment of the foot and ankle.

Authors:  Hannah L Jarvis; Christopher J Nester; Richard K Jones; Anita Williams; Peter D Bowden
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 2.303

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.