| Literature DB >> 23049442 |
Marcelo Tavares Viana1, Manuella Cavalcanti Perez, Valdenilson Ribeiro Ribas, Gilberto de Freire Martins, Célia Maria Machado Barbosa de Castro.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the impact of moderate physical exercise on the total and differential leukocyte counts and red blood cell count of 36 sixty-day-old adult male Wistar rats subjected to early malnourishment.Entities:
Keywords: Animals; Exercise; Leukocytes; Malnutrition; Physical exertion; Rats
Year: 2012 PMID: 23049442 PMCID: PMC3460411 DOI: 10.5581/1516-8484.20120073
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter ISSN: 1516-8484
Figure 1Lower total body weight gain in malnourished animals compared to nourished animals from the 7th to the 120th day of life. Mean ± standard deviation - Student t test, with p-value<0.05 *
Figure 2Lower total body weight gain in malnourished animals submitted to physical exercise compared to nourished animals submitted to physical exercise over the 8-week training period. Mean ± standard deviation - Student t test, p-value < 0.05 *
Analysis of total leukocyte count (x 103/μL) in peripheral blood of adult rats within and between nourished and malnourished groups during the eight weeks of moderate physical exercise
| NU | 7.9 ± 0.2 | 7.8 ± 0.2 | 7.1 ± 0.2 | 7.6 ± 0.4 | 7.3 ± 0.4 | 7.6 ± 0.3 | 8.0 ± 0.4 | 7.9 ± 0.2 | 7.3 ± 0.4 |
| NT | 8.0 ± 0.2 | 9.1 ± 0.1 | 7.5 ± 0.3 | 7.4 ± 0.3 | 9.0 ± 0.4a | 9.7 ± 0.1a | 10.4 ± 0.2a | 10.7 ± 0.2a | 10.9 ± 0.1a |
| MU | 6.6 ± 0.4d | 6.3 ± 0.4 | 6.4 ± 0.5 | 6.7 ± 0.5 | 6.7 ± 0.4 | 6.8 ± 0.2 | 6.8 ± 0.1 | 6.9 ± 0.1 | 6.8 ± 0.1 |
| MT | 6.7 ± 0.1d | 8.0 ± 0.1b,c | 7.7 ± 0.6b,c | 7.5 ± 0.4b,c | c 7.9 ± 0.5b,c | 7.8 ± 0.4b,c | 8.1 ± 0.3b,c | 8.0 ± 0.2b,c | 7.7 ± 0.3b,c |
T0 to T8 - Before the start of training to the eighth week of training; NU - Nourished untrained; NT - Nourished trained; MU - Malnourished untrained; MT - malnourished trained; Mean ± standard deviation. Student's t test (p-value < 0.05); a - Signifcant difference between nourished groups (NT and NU) b - Signifcant difference between malnourished groups (MT and MU); c - Signifcant difference between trained groups (MT and NT)
Analysis of differential leukocyte counts in peripheral blood of adult rats within and between nourished and malnourished groups during 8 weeks of MPE
| Lymphocytes (x 109/L) | ||||||||||||||
| NU | 72.0 ± 2.6 | 71.3 ± 2.7 | 70.3 ± 1.5 | 69.1 ± 1.9 | 68.8 ± 1.4 | 69.1 ± 1.9 | 68.1 ± 0.9 | 67.8 ± 1.9 | 67.0 ± 2.1 | |||||
| NT | 71.5 ± 3.3 | 71.0 ± 2.2 | 71.1 ± 2.4 | 70.1 ± 2.7 | 71.0 ± 2.1 | 72.5 ± 2.6a | 74.1 ± 1.8a | 76.0 ± 0.8a | 78.5 ± 1.3a | |||||
| MU | 70.1 ± 2.9 | 70.8 ± 2.3 | 71.0 ± 2.6 | 68.8 ± 2.9 | 68.0 ± 1.4 | 67.8 ± 1.7 | 68.0 ± 1.5 | 68.0 ± 1.4 | 67.8 ± 1.7 | |||||
| MT | 70.3 ± 2.7 | 70.1 ± 2.6 | 69.5 ± 1.7 | 71.1 ± 2.7 | 72.5 ± 2.9b | 73.0 ± 2.5b | 73.5 ± 4.5b | 74.5 ± 5.9b | 75.0 ± 4.3b | |||||
| Neutrophils (x 109/L) | ||||||||||||||
| NU | 20.1 ± 1.4 | 20.0 ± 1.1 | 19.5 ± 1.0 | 18.0 ± 1.6 | 19.0 ± 2.0 | 18.9 ± 2.1 | 19.0 ± 2.1 | 20.1 ± 1.9 | 19.1 ± 1.6 | |||||
| NT | 19.1 ± 1.3 | 19.3 ± 1.3 | 18.8 ± 1.6 | 18.6 ± 1.1a | 19.8 ± 1.5a | 20.0 ± 1.2a | 20.7 ± 1.5a | 22.1 ± 0.6a | 22.5 ± 1.7a | |||||
| MU | 19.8 ± 1.7 | 20.0 ± 1.1 | 18.8 ± 1.1 | 19.5 ± 1.8 | 18.8 ± 2.5 | 18.1 ± 2.1 | 18.6 ± 2.0 | 18.8 ± 1.9 | 19.1 ± 1.6 | |||||
| MT | 19.5 ± 1.2 | 20.0 ± 1.1 | 21.0 ± 0.8 | 21.5 ± 2.5b | 22.1 ± 2.3b | 23.0 ± 2.8b | 23.8 ± 2.2b | 24 ± 1.8bc | 25.5 ± 2b,c | |||||
| Monocytes (x 109/L) | ||||||||||||||
| NU | 5.3 ± 2.1 | 5.5 ± 2.1 | 6.0 ± 0.8 | 5.8 ± 1.3 | 5.5 ± 1.8 | 6.6 ± 1.3 | 6.5 ± 1.0 | 5.8 ± 1.7 | 5.8 ± 1.4 | |||||
| NT | 5.5 ± 1.8 | 5.8 ± 1.6 | 6.0 ± 0.8 | 7.0 ± 1.1 | 6.8 ± 0.4 | 7.3 ± 1.2a | 8.0 ± 0.6a | 9.0 ± 0.6a | 9.5 ± 0.8a | |||||
| MU | 4.8 ± 1.3 | 4.6 ± 0.8 | 5.0 ± 1.4 | 4.8 ± 0.7 | 3.8 ± 1.1 | 3.8 ± 0.9 | 4.1 ± 0.7 | 3.8 ± 0.7 | 4.1 ± 1.1 | |||||
| MT | 5.1 ± 0.9 | 5.5 ± 0.8 | 5.5 ± 1.6 | 6.0 ± 2.1 | 6.8 ± 0.9b | 6.6 ± 1.2b | 7.1 ± 1.4b | 7.5 ± 1.8b | 8.0 ± 2.2b | |||||
| Eosinophils (x 109/L) | ||||||||||||||
| NU | 2.3 ± 0.8 | 3.1 ± 1.3 | 3.5 ± 1.2 | 2.5 ± 1.0 | 3.0 ± 0.6 | 3.8 ± 0.7 | 2.8 ± 0.7 | 2.8 ± 0.7 | 2.8 ± 0.9 | |||||
| NT | 3.1 ± 1.1 | 4.0 ± 0.8 | 3.5 ± 1.3 | 3.5 ± 1.0 | 3.8 ± 1.1 | 3.8 ± 0.7 | 4.0 ± 0.8 | 4.1 ± 0.7 | 4.1 ± 0.9 | |||||
| MU | 3.5 ± 1.0 | 3.8 ± 0.9 | 4.1 ± 0.7 | 3.8 ± 0.9 | 3.5 ± 1.0 | 3.0 ± 0.8 | 3.8 ± 0.7 | 3.1 ± 1.3 | 2.8 ± 0.7 | |||||
| MT | 3.5 ± 1.0 | 4.0 ± 0.8 | 3.8 ± 1.1 | 3.6 ± 0.8 | 4.0 ± 0.8 | 3.5 ± 1.0 | 4.3 ± 0.8 | 3.8 ± 0.9 | 4.0 ± 0.8 | |||||
T0 to T8 - Before the start of training to the eighth week of training; NU - Nourished untrained; NT - Nourished trained; MU - Malnourished untrained; MT - malnourished trained; Mean ± standard deviation. Student's t test (p-value < 0.05); a - Signifcant difference between nourished groups (NT and NU) b - Signifcant difference between malnourished groups (MT and MU); c - Signifcant difference between trained groups (MT and NT); d - Signifcant difference between malnourished and nourished groups (MT + MU and NT+ NU - effect of malnutrition)
Analysis of the red blood cell (RBC) indices in peripheral blood of adult rats within and between nourished and malnourished groups
| Hemoglobin (g/100mL) | ||||||||||
| MU | 11.5 ± 0.5 d | 11.8 ± 0.9 | 10.8 ± 0.6 | 11.1 ± 0.8 | 11.5 ± 0.6 | 11.0 ± 0.4 | 11.6 ± 0.4 | 12.1 ± 0.2 | 11.8 ± 0.2 | |
| MT | 11.2 ± 0.4 d | 12.5 ± 0.4 c | 11.9 ± 1.1 | 12.2 ± 0.9 | 12.8 ± 0.6 b | 13.0 ± 0.1 b | 12.9 ± 0.9 b | 13.2 ± 0.7 b | 13.6 ± 0.5 b | |
| NU | 12.0 ± 0.3 | 11.9 ± 0.4 | 12.5 ± 0.5 | 11.9 ± 0.7 | 12.0 ± 1.0 | 12.1 ± 0.4 | 11.9 ± 0.5 | 12.4 ± 0.5 | 12.6 ± 0.5 | |
| NT | 12.2 ± 0.4 | 13.6 ± 0.6 a | 12.4 ± 0.5 | 12.6 ± 0.6 | 13.0 ± 1.0 | 13.4 ± 0.9 a | 13.6 ± 0.5 a | 14.0 ± 0.6 a | 14.1 ± 0.6 a | |
| RBC x109/L | ||||||||||
| MU | 7.2 ± 0.4 d | 7.4 ± 0.7 | 7.0 ± 0.2 | 7.5 ± 0.4 | 7.3 ± 0.5 | 6.9 ± 0.5 | 7.1 ± 0.2 | 7.3 ± 0.3 | 7.5 ± 0.6 | |
| MT | 7.5 ± 0.1 d | 7.8 ± 0.3 c | 7.3 ± 0.4 | 7.6 ± 0.4 | 8.5 ± 0.2 b | 7.8 ± 0.3 b | 8.1 ± 0.1 b | 8.2 ± 0.4 b | 8.5 ± 0.1 b | |
| NU | 7.9 ± 0.2 | 8.4 ± 0.1 | 8.1 ± 0.2 | 8.2 ± 0.1 | 8.0 ± 0.3 | 7.5 ± 0.2 | 7.6 ± 0.2 | 7.8 ± 0.2 | 8.1 ± 0.2 | |
| NT | 8.2 ± 0.2 | 8.6 ± 0.2 | 8.2 ± 0.2 | 8.3 ± 0.1 | 8.2 ± 0.4 | 8.1 ± 0.2 a | 8.3 ± 0.2 a | 8.6 ± 0.2 a | 8.8 ± 0.4 a | |
| Hematocrit (%) | ||||||||||
| MU | 47.0 ± 4.9 | 46.5 ± 4.4 | 49.1 ± 3.1 | 48.6 ± 2.1 | 48.3 ± 2.7 | 46.3 ± 6.1 | 49.3 ± 3.7 | 51.3 ± 1.6 | 50.1 ± 2.3 | |
| MT | 47.3 ± 6.1 | 43.6 ± 9.8 | 48.1 ± 3.9 | 48.0 ± 4.9 | 50.3 ± 2.5 | 50.6 ± 1.3 | 50.0 ± 2.3 | 49.6 ± 2.5 | 53.3 ± 1.8 b | |
| NU | 48.6 ± 5.1 | 49.1 ± 5.6 | 38.8 ± 7.2 | 47.5 ± 3.3 | 45.0 ± 4.8 | 45.5 ± 3.9 | 48.6 ± 1.5 | 52.0 ± 2.0 | 52.3 ± 1.9 | |
| NT | 51.8 ± 1.6 | 49.1 ± 1.4 | 52.6 ± 1.7 a | 51.5 ± 2.5 a | 53.0 ± 3.3 a | 51.8 ± 2.4 a | 52.0 ± 1.7 a | 42.5 ± 2.7 a | 55.3 ± 1.7 a | |
T0 to T8 - Before the start of training to the eighth week of training; RBC - red blood cell count; NU - Nourished untrained; NT - Nourished trained; MU - untrained; MT - malnourished trained; Mean ± standard deviation. Student's t test (p-value < 0.05); a - Signifcant difference between nourished groups (NT and NU); b - Signifcant difference between malnourished groups (MT and MU); c - Signifcant difference between trained groups (MT and NT); d - Signifcant difference between malnourished and nourished groups (MT + MU and NT+ NU - effect of malnutrition)