BACKGROUND: Real time PCR has become the most common technique to monitor BCR-ABL transcript levels of patients treated with kinase inhibitors. The aim of this study was to evaluate BCR-ABL levels of chronic myeloid leukemia patients treated with imatinib in the chronic phase and correlate the response to therapy and event-free survival. METHODS: BCR-ABL levels were measured in peripheral blood cell samples using Real time PCR at diagnosis and then every 3 months after starting therapy with imatinib. Major molecular response was defined as a three-log reduction from the standardized baseline value. Major molecular response values were adjusted to international scale using a conversion factor of 1.19. The results are reported as a BCR-ABL/ABL ratio (%). RESULTS: Hematological, major cytogenetic and complete cytogenetic responses were achieved by 57 (95%), 45 (75%) and 38 (63%) patients, respectively. Twenty-four out of sixty patients achieved a major molecular response (40%) in a median time of 8.5 months. Overall survival and event free survival were higher for patients with (100%) versus patients without (77%) a complete cytogenetic response (p-value = 0.01) at 48 months. Patients with complete cytogenetic response and major molecular response had a higher event free survival compared to patients with complete cytogenetic response but without major molecular response (p-value = 0.007). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the prognostic impact of achieving complete cytogenetic response and a major molecular response and also the importance of molecular monitoring in the follow-up of chronic myeloid leukemia patients were demonstrated.s.
BACKGROUND: Real time PCR has become the most common technique to monitor BCR-ABL transcript levels of patients treated with kinase inhibitors. The aim of this study was to evaluate BCR-ABL levels of chronic myeloid leukemiapatients treated with imatinib in the chronic phase and correlate the response to therapy and event-free survival. METHODS:BCR-ABL levels were measured in peripheral blood cell samples using Real time PCR at diagnosis and then every 3 months after starting therapy with imatinib. Major molecular response was defined as a three-log reduction from the standardized baseline value. Major molecular response values were adjusted to international scale using a conversion factor of 1.19. The results are reported as a BCR-ABL/ABL ratio (%). RESULTS: Hematological, major cytogenetic and complete cytogenetic responses were achieved by 57 (95%), 45 (75%) and 38 (63%) patients, respectively. Twenty-four out of sixty patients achieved a major molecular response (40%) in a median time of 8.5 months. Overall survival and event free survival were higher for patients with (100%) versus patients without (77%) a complete cytogenetic response (p-value = 0.01) at 48 months. Patients with complete cytogenetic response and major molecular response had a higher event free survival compared to patients with complete cytogenetic response but without major molecular response (p-value = 0.007). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the prognostic impact of achieving complete cytogenetic response and a major molecular response and also the importance of molecular monitoring in the follow-up of chronic myeloid leukemiapatients were demonstrated.s.
Authors: J P Radich; T Gooley; E Bryant; T Chauncey; R Clift; L Beppu; S Edmands; M E Flowers; K Kerkof; R Nelson; F R Appelbaum Journal: Blood Date: 2001-09-15 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Michele Baccarani; Giuseppe Saglio; John Goldman; Andreas Hochhaus; Bengt Simonsson; Frederick Appelbaum; Jane Apperley; Francisco Cervantes; Jorge Cortes; Michael Deininger; Alois Gratwohl; François Guilhot; Mary Horowitz; Timothy Hughes; Hagop Kantarjian; Richard Larson; Dietger Niederwieser; Richard Silver; Rudiger Hehlmann Journal: Blood Date: 2006-05-18 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Susan Branford; Linda Fletcher; Nicholas C P Cross; Martin C Müller; Andreas Hochhaus; Dong-Wook Kim; Jerald P Radich; Giuseppe Saglio; Fabrizio Pane; Suzanne Kamel-Reid; Y Lynn Wang; Richard D Press; Kevin Lynch; Zbigniew Rudzki; John M Goldman; Timothy Hughes Journal: Blood Date: 2008-08-06 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Richard D Press; Zac Love; Ashlie A Tronnes; Rui Yang; Thuan Tran; Solange Mongoue-Tchokote; Motomi Mori; Michael J Mauro; Michael W Deininger; Brian J Druker Journal: Blood Date: 2006-02-07 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: David Marin; Dragana Milojkovic; Eduardo Olavarria; Jamshid S Khorashad; Hugues de Lavallade; Alistair G Reid; Letizia Foroni; Katayoun Rezvani; Marco Bua; Francesco Dazzi; Jiri Pavlu; Matthias Klammer; Jaspal S Kaeda; John M Goldman; Jane F Apperley Journal: Blood Date: 2008-08-20 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Stephen G O'Brien; François Guilhot; Richard A Larson; Insa Gathmann; Michele Baccarani; Francisco Cervantes; Jan J Cornelissen; Thomas Fischer; Andreas Hochhaus; Timothy Hughes; Klaus Lechner; Johan L Nielsen; Philippe Rousselot; Josy Reiffers; Giuseppe Saglio; John Shepherd; Bengt Simonsson; Alois Gratwohl; John M Goldman; Hagop Kantarjian; Kerry Taylor; Gregor Verhoef; Ann E Bolton; Renaud Capdeville; Brian J Druker Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-03-13 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Tim P Hughes; Jaspal Kaeda; Susan Branford; Zbigniew Rudzki; Andreas Hochhaus; Martee L Hensley; Insa Gathmann; Ann E Bolton; Iris C van Hoomissen; John M Goldman; Jerald P Radich Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-10-09 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Huda F Ebian; Al-Shabrawy M Abdelnabi; Abdallah S Abdelazem; Tarek Khamis; Hebatallah M Fawzy; Samia Hussein Journal: Leuk Res Rep Date: 2022-05-09
Authors: Beatriz Felicio Ribeiro; Eliana C M Miranda; Dulcinéia Martins de Albuquerque; Márcia T Delamain; Gislaine Oliveira-Duarte; Maria Helena Almeida; Bruna Vergílio; Rosana Antunes da Silveira; Vagner Oliveira-Duarte; Irene Lorand-Metze; Carmino A De Souza; Katia B B Pagnano Journal: Clinics (Sao Paulo) Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 2.365