Literature DB >> 23049290

The expression of the CD56 antigen is associated with poor prognosis in patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

Eduardo Magalhães Rego1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 23049290      PMCID: PMC3415747          DOI: 10.5581/1516-8484.20110048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter        ISSN: 1516-8484


× No keyword cloud information.
The diversity of clinical, hematological and genetic features among patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has been recognized for many decades. However, during recent years, considerable progress has been made in defining new diagnostic and prognostic markers. Among them, the detection of specific molecules in the leukemic cells has special relevance and is mandatory for the identification of certain subtypes of myeloid neoplasms.( In this context, flow cytometry-based immunophenotyping has had an immense impact on the diagnosis and management of AML and has become a routine procedure. In the present issue of this journal, Alegretti et al. reported the analysis of the association between expression of CD56 on myeloblasts and treatment outcome in a cohort of 48 patients with AML treated in a single center in Brazil.( CD56 is the neural-cell adhesion molecule (NCAM), which is a well known marker for natural killer (NK) cells, but is also expressed on a subset of normal T cells. Alegretti et al. demonstrated that the expression of CD56 was associated with worse prognosis. The overall survival (OS) of patients who expressed CD56 (CD56+) was significantly shorter compared to patients who did not express the marker (mean 4.0 versus 14.5 months; p-value = 0.03). In addition, CD56+ patients presented a higher death rate during induction, even though the difference was not significant (62.5% versus 27.5%; p-value = 0.097). The results may have been affected by the small number of patients in the CD56+ group (n = 6) but the magnitude of the difference in OS is too striking to be ignored. Their results corroborate the studies by Chang et al.( and Baer et al.,( but in the latter the association between prognosis and CD56 expression was restricted to patients with t(8;21)/RUNX1-RUNX1T1 whereas in the former the association was between CD56 expression and abnormalities involving 11q23 and extramedullary disease. To further complicate the issue, a recent manuscript by Montesinos et al.( reported the prognostic relevance of CD56 in acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). They analyzed 651 patients with APL of whom 72 expressed CD56 (11%). CD56+ APL was significantly associated with high white blood cell counts, low albumin levels, the BCR3 isoform and coexpression of the CD2, CD34, CD7, HLA-DR, CD15 and CD117 antigens. For CD56+ APL, the 5-year relapse rate was 22% compared with a 10% relapse rate for CD56-APL (p-value = 0.006). CD56+ APL also showed a greater risk of extramedullary relapse (p-value < 0.001). The relationship between the expression of CD56 and treatment outcome has also been analyzed in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Ravandi et al.( demonstrated a high incidence of infiltration of the central nervous system in adult patients with ALL. Dalmazzo et al.,( analyzing Tcell ALL, reported that patients expressing CD56 were older, expressed cytotoxic molecules at a higher frequency and presented shorter OS compared to CD56-patients. Taken together the existing published data suggest that the expression of CD56 is associated with worse prognosis in acute leukemias and the manuscript by Alegretti et al., corroborates reports from different countries. Nevertheless, the mechanisms underlying this association are unclear. Moreover, it is not clear whether CD56+ AML patients should receive a more intense treatment than those that do not express CD56. At present, this matter should be considered with caution, but, definitely there is opportunity for future multicentric clinical trials to address this issue.
  8 in total

1.  The presence of CD56/CD16 in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia correlates with the expression of cytotoxic molecules and is associated with worse response to treatment.

Authors:  Leandro F F Dalmazzo; Rafael H Jácomo; André F Marinato; Lorena L Figueiredo-Pontes; Renato L G Cunha; Aglair B Garcia; Eduardo M Rego; Roberto P Falcão
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2008-11-11       Impact factor: 6.998

2.  CD56 expression predicts occurrence of CNS disease in acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Farhad Ravandi; Jorge Cortes; Zeev Estrov; Deborah Thomas; Francis J Giles; Yang O Huh; Sherry Pierce; Susan O'Brien; Stefan Faderl; Hagop M Kantarjian
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.156

3.  Mixed-phenotype acute leukemia: clinical and laboratory features and outcome in 100 patients defined according to the WHO 2008 classification.

Authors:  Estella Matutes; Winfried F Pickl; Mars Van't Veer; Ricardo Morilla; John Swansbury; Herbert Strobl; Andishe Attarbaschi; Georg Hopfinger; Sue Ashley; Marie Christine Bene; Anna Porwit; Alberto Orfao; Petr Lemez; Richard Schabath; Wolf-Dieter Ludwig
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  Clinical significance of CD56 expression in patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia treated with all-trans retinoic acid and anthracycline-based regimens.

Authors:  Pau Montesinos; Chelo Rayón; Edo Vellenga; Salut Brunet; José González; Marcos González; Aleksandra Holowiecka; Jordi Esteve; Juan Bergua; José D González; Concha Rivas; Mar Tormo; Vicente Rubio; Javier Bueno; Félix Manso; Gustavo Milone; Javier de la Serna; Inmaculada Pérez; Manuel Pérez-Encinas; Isabel Krsnik; Josep M Ribera; Lourdes Escoda; Bob Lowenberg; Miguel A Sanz
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Expression of the neural cell adhesion molecule CD56 is associated with short remission duration and survival in acute myeloid leukemia with t(8;21)(q22;q22).

Authors:  M R Baer; C C Stewart; D Lawrence; D C Arthur; J C Byrd; F R Davey; C A Schiffer; C D Bloomfield
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1997-08-15       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 6.  The 2008 revision of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia: rationale and important changes.

Authors:  James W Vardiman; Jüergen Thiele; Daniel A Arber; Richard D Brunning; Michael J Borowitz; Anna Porwit; Nancy Lee Harris; Michelle M Le Beau; Eva Hellström-Lindberg; Ayalew Tefferi; Clara D Bloomfield
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  The expression of CD56 antigen is associated with poor prognosis in patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Ana Paula Alegretti; Christina Matzenbacher Bittar; Rosane Bittencourt; Amanda Kirchner Piccoli; Laiana Schneider; Lúcia Mariano Silla; Suzane Dal Bó; Ricardo Machado Xavier
Journal:  Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter       Date:  2011

8.  Extramedullary infiltrates of AML are associated with CD56 expression, 11q23 abnormalities and inferior clinical outcome.

Authors:  Hong Chang; Joseph Brandwein; Qi-Long Yi; Kathy Chun; Bruce Patterson; Bill Brien
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.156

  8 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  CD56-positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma/leukemia with BCL6/MYC double-hit and multiple gene mutations: an indicator of poor prognosis?

Authors:  Yanquan Liu; Jianzhen Shen; M Awal Issah; Tingbo Liu; Huarong Zhou; Haiying Fu
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.671

2.  Clinical Courses of Two Pediatric Patients with Acute Megakaryoblastic Leukemia Harboring the CBFA2T3-GLIS2 Fusion Gene.

Authors:  Mayu Ishibashi; Tomoko Yokosuka; Masakatsu D Yanagimachi; Fuminori Iwasaki; Shin-Ichi Tsujimoto; Koji Sasaki; Masanobu Takeuchi; Reo Tanoshima; Hiromi Kato; Ryosuke Kajiwara; Fumiko Tanaka; Hiroaki Goto; Shumpei Yokota
Journal:  Turk J Haematol       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 1.831

3.  DNAM-1/CD226 is functionally expressed on acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cells and is associated with favorable prognosis.

Authors:  Anna Chashchina; Melanie Märklin; Clemens Hinterleitner; Helmut R Salih; Jonas S Heitmann; Boris Klimovich
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-09       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.