Literature DB >> 23048057

First serial assessment at 6 months and 2 years of the second generation of absorb everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold: a multi-imaging modality study.

John A Ormiston1, Patrick W Serruys, Yoshinobu Onuma, Robert-Jan van Geuns, Bernard de Bruyne, Dariusz Dudek, Leif Thuesen, Pieter C Smits, Bernard Chevalier, Dougal McClean, Jacques Koolen, Stephan Windecker, Robert Whitbourn, Ian Meredith, Cecile Dorange, Susan Veldhof, Karine Miquel Hebert, Richard Rapoza, Hector M Garcia-Garcia.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nonserial observations have shown this bioresorbable scaffold to have no signs of area reduction at 6 months and recovery of vasomotion at 1 year. Serial observations at 6 months and 2 years have to confirm the absence of late restenosis or unfavorable imaging outcomes. METHODS AND
RESULTS: The ABSORB trial is a multicenter single-arm trial assessing the safety and performance of an everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold. Forty-five patients underwent serial invasive imaging, such as quantitative coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound, and optical coherence tomography at 6 and 24 months of follow-up. From 6 to 24 months, late luminal loss increased from 0.16±0.18 to 0.27±0.20 mm on quantitative coronary angiography, with an increase in neointima of 0.68±0.43 mm(2) on optical coherence tomography and 0.17±0.26 mm(2) on intravascular ultrasound. Struts still recognizable on optical coherence tomography at 2 years showed 99% of neointimal coverage with optical and ultrasonic signs of bioresorption accompanied by increase in mean scaffold area compared with baseline (0.54±1.09 mm(2) on intravascular ultrasound, P=0.003 and 0.77±1.33 m(2) on optical coherence tomography, P=0.016). Two-year major adverse cardiac event rate was 6.8% without any scaffold thrombosis.
CONCLUSIONS: This serial analysis of the second generation of the everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold confirmed, at medium term, the safety and efficacy of the new device. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00856856.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23048057     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.112.971549

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1941-7640            Impact factor:   6.546


  32 in total

1.  Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold System in the Treatment of Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy: the CART (Cardiac Allograft Reparative Therapy) Prospective Multicenter Pilot Study.

Authors:  Michele Pighi; Fabrizio Tomai; Alessandro Petrolini; Leonardo de Luca; Giuseppe Tarantini; Alberto Barioli; Paola Colombo; Silvio Klugmann; Marco Ferlini; Maurizio Ferrario Ormezzano; Bruno Loi; Paolo Calabrò; Renato Maria Bianchi; Giuseppe Faggian; Alberto Forni; Corrado Vassanelli; Marco Valgimigli; Flavio Ribichini
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Fusion of optical coherence tomographic and angiographic data for more accurate evaluation of the endothelial shear stress patterns and neointimal distribution after bioresorbable scaffold implantation: comparison with intravascular ultrasound-derived reconstructions.

Authors:  Christos V Bourantas; Michail I Papafaklis; Lampros Lakkas; Antonis Sakellarios; Yoshinobu Onuma; Yao-Jun Zhang; Takashi Muramatsu; Roberto Diletti; Paschalis Bizopoulos; Fanis Kalatzis; Katerina K Naka; Dimitrios I Fotiadis; Jin Wang; Hector M Garcia Garcia; Takeshi Kimura; Lampros K Michalis; Patrick W Serruys
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Neointimal coverage and late apposition of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds implanted in the acute phase of myocardial infarction: OCT data from the PRAGUE-19 study.

Authors:  Petr Toušek; Viktor Kočka; Martin Malý; Libor Lisa; Tomáš Buděšínský; Petr Widimský
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 4.  Causes, assessment, and treatment of stent thrombosis--intravascular imaging insights.

Authors:  Daniel S Ong; Ik-Kyung Jang
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 32.419

5.  A head to head comparison of XINSORB bioresorbable sirolimus-eluting scaffold versus metallic sirolimus-eluting stent: 180 days follow-up in a porcine model.

Authors:  Li Shen; Yizhe Wu; Lei Ge; Yaojun Zhang; Qibing Wang; Juying Qian; Zhifen Qiu; Junbo Ge
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 6.  Bioresorbable Scaffolds: Current Evidences in the Treatment of Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Bhargav Dave
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-10-01

7.  Crimping-induced structural gradients explain the lasting strength of poly l-lactide bioresorbable vascular scaffolds during hydrolysis.

Authors:  Karthik Ramachandran; Tiziana Di Luccio; Artemis Ailianou; Mary Beth Kossuth; James P Oberhauser; Julia A Kornfield
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  The effects of novel, bioresorbable scaffolds on coronary vascular pathophysiology.

Authors:  Michael J Lipinski; Ricardo O Escarcega; Thibault Lhermusier; Ron Waksman
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 9.  Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds - basic concepts and clinical outcome.

Authors:  Ciro Indolfi; Salvatore De Rosa; Antonio Colombo
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 32.419

10.  Bioresorbable Scaffolds.

Authors:  Sidakpal Panaich; Theodore Schreiber; Cindy Grines
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2014-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.