Literature DB >> 23047489

Mortality and morbidity in cardiac resynchronization patients: impact of lead position, paced left ventricular QRS morphology and other characteristics on long-term outcome.

Marek Jastrzebski1, Jerzy Wilinski, Kamil Fijorek, Tomasz Sondej, Danuta Czarnecka.   

Abstract

AIMS: To investigate the effect of implantation-related characteristics, especially lead position and left ventricular (LV)-paced QRS morphology, on long-term mortality and morbidity in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) patients. METHODS AND
RESULTS: The study retrospectively analysed 362 consecutive patients who underwent CRT device implantation over a 6 year period. Pre-implantation, LV-only paced, and biventricularly paced 12-lead electrocardiograms were obtained. Left ventricular and right ventricular (RV) lead positions were determined using biplane fluoroscopy and roentgenograms. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the survival function for all-cause death/hospitalization and cardiovascular death/hospitalization. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were also applied. The mean follow-up time was 24.7 ± 16.9 months. There were 79 deaths (62 cardiovascular) and 99 unplanned hospitalizations (72 cardiovascular). One year and 2 year all-cause mortality rates were 8.5 and 18.0%, respectively. Electrocardiographic and fluoroscopic descriptors of the LV lead position were found to be predictors of mortality/morbidity (as were functional class, heart failure aetiology, hyponatremia, and chronic atrial fibrillation). In particular, the antero-apical pattern of LV-only paced QRS showed a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.8 in univariate and 1.7 in multivariate analysis for predicting all-cause death/hospitalization (P = 0.006). The apical/paraseptal LV lead position showed an HR of 2.1 in univariate and 1.9 in multivariate analysis for predicting cardiovascular death/hospitalization (P = 0.018).
CONCLUSION: To achieve better long-term outcomes in CRT patients the antero-apical pattern of LV QRS complexes and apical or paraseptal LV lead position should be avoided.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23047489     DOI: 10.1093/europace/eus340

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of four LBBB definitions for predicting mortality in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Marek Jastrzębski; Piotr Kukla; Roksana Kisiel; Kamil Fijorek; Paweł Moskal; Danuta Czarnecka
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 1.468

2.  QRS prolongation after cardiac resynchronization therapy is a predictor of persistent mechanical dyssynchrony.

Authors:  Oguz Karaca; Onur Omaygenc; Beytullah Cakal; Sinem Deniz Cakal; Irfan Barutcu; Bilal Boztosun; Fethi Kilicaslan
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  Clinical and echocardiographic response of apical vs nonapical right ventricular lead position in CRT: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sharan Prakash Sharma; Khagendra Dahal; Paari Dominic; Rajbir S Sangha
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2018-03-13

4.  Impact of anatomical reverse remodelling in the design of optimal quadripolar pacing leads: A computational study.

Authors:  Cristobal Rodero; Marina Strocchi; Angela W C Lee; Christopher A Rinaldi; Edward J Vigmond; Gernot Plank; Pablo Lamata; Steven A Niederer
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 4.589

5.  Lateral left ventricular lead position is superior to posterior position in long-term outcome of patients who underwent cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Anett Behon; Walter Richard Schwertner; Eperke Dóra Merkel; Attila Kovács; Bálint Károly Lakatos; Endre Zima; László Gellér; Valentina Kutyifa; Annamária Kosztin; Béla Merkely
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2020-10-22
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.