Literature DB >> 23047124

Hospital characteristics associated with maintenance or improvement of guideline-recommended lymph node evaluation for colon cancer.

Helen M Parsons1, James W Begun, Patricia M McGovern, Todd M Tuttle, Karen M Kuntz, Beth A Virnig.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Over the past 20 years, surgical practice organizations have recommended the identification of ≥12 lymph nodes from surgically treated colon cancer patients as an indicator of quality performance for adequate staging; however, studies suggest that significant variation exists among hospitals in their level of adherence to this recommendation. We examined hospital-level factors that were associated with institutional improvement or maintenance of adequate lymph node evaluation after the introduction of surgical quality guidelines. RESEARCH
DESIGN: Using the 1996-2007 SEER-Medicare data, we evaluated hospital characteristics associated with short-term (1999-2001), medium-term (2002-2004), and long-term (2005-2007) guideline-recommended (≥12) lymph node evaluation compared with initial evaluation levels (1996-1998) using χ tests and multivariate logistic regression analysis, adjusting for patient case-mix.
RESULTS: We identified 228 hospitals that performed ≥6 colon cancer surgeries during each study period from 1996-2007. In the initial study period (1996-1998), 26.3% (n=60) of hospitals were performing guideline-recommended evaluation, which increased to 28.1% in 1999-2001, 44.7% in 2002-2004, and 70.6% in 2005-2007. In multivariate analyses, a hospital's prior guideline performance [odds ratio (OR) (95% confidence interval (CI)): 4.02 (1.92, 8.42)], teaching status [OR (95% CI): 2.33 (1.03, 5.28)], and American College of Surgeon's Oncology Group membership [OR (95% CI): 3.39 (1.39, 8.31)] were significantly associated with short-term guideline-recommended lymph node evaluation. Prior hospital performance [OR (95% CI): 2.41 (1.17, 4.94)], urban location [OR (95% CI): 2.66 (1.12, 6.31)], and American College of Surgeon's Oncology Group membership [OR (95% CI): 6.05 (2.32, 15.77)] were associated with medium-term performance; however, these factors were not associated with long-term performance.
CONCLUSIONS: Over the 12-year period, there were marked improvements in hospital performance for guideline-recommended lymph node evaluation. Understanding patterns in improvement over time contributes to debates over optimal designs of quality-improvement programs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23047124     DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318270ba0d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  4 in total

1.  Hospital variation in sphincter preservation for elderly rectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Christopher M Dodgion; Bridget A Neville; Stuart R Lipsitz; Deborah Schrag; Elizabeth Breen; Michael J Zinner; Caprice C Greenberg
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2014-03-22       Impact factor: 2.192

2.  Medical Oncologists' Experiences in Using Genomic Testing for Lung and Colorectal Cancer Care.

Authors:  Stacy W Gray; Benjamin Kim; Lynette Sholl; Angel Cronin; Aparna R Parikh; Carrie N Klabunde; Katherine L Kahn; David A Haggstrom; Nancy L Keating
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 3.840

3.  Mapping evidence on standards and quality of care for older persons in long-term care facilities: a scoping review protocol.

Authors:  Letasha Kalideen; Pragashnie Govender; Jacqueline Marina van Wyk; Desmond Kuupiel
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2021-05-22

4.  Who does it first? The uptake of medical innovations in the performance of thrombolysis on ischemic stroke patients in Germany: a study based on hospital quality data.

Authors:  Nadine Scholten; Holger Pfaff; Helmar C Lehmann; Gereon R Fink; Ute Karbach
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 7.327

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.