Literature DB >> 23047061

A meta-analysis of bevacizumab alone and in combination with irinotecan in the treatment of patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme.

Guobin Zhang1, Shengyue Huang, Zhongcheng Wang.   

Abstract

Combining bevacizumab with irinotecan is a new chemotherapy regimen for patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Recent phase II trials suggest that this combined chemotherapy is beneficial to patients, but the subsequent adverse events may lead to treatment discontinuation. No comparison has yet demonstrated conclusively that the combined chemotherapy is more beneficial than single-agent chemotherapy. Thus, a meta-analysis was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab compared to bevacizumab combined with irinotecan for the treatment of recurrent GBM. A total of 480 patients were included in the study, with 183 patients (38.1%) in the bevacizumab group and 297 patients (61.9%) in the bevacizumab plus irinotecan group. The median overall survival was 8.63 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.54-8.72 months) and 8.91 months (95% CI, 8.69-9.13 months), respectively. The mean objective response rate (complete response plus partial response rate) was 33.9% (95% CI, 18.1-52.1%) and 45.8% (95% CI, 28.2-66.7%), respectively. The 6-month progression-free survival rates (PFS-6) were 38.8% (95% CI, 18.8-57.0%) and 48.3% (95% CI, 25.4-54.3%), respectively. The rate of discontinuation was 5.5% and 20.0%, respectively. Compared with patients treated with bevacizumab only, those in the bevacizumab plus irinotecan group had higher PFS-6 (p=0.046), objective response (p=0.013) and rate of discontinuation (p=0.000) but there was no statistically significant difference in overall survival between the groups (p=0.487). Thus, although the combination of bevacizumab and irinotecan may increase the rate of discontinuation, it provided no obvious improvement in overall survival in patients with recurrent GBM. Therefore, the benefits of drug combination are outweighed by the treatment discontinuity and quality of life effects of drug toxicity and should be considered on an individual patient basis only. Crown
Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23047061     DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2011.12.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Neurosci        ISSN: 0967-5868            Impact factor:   1.961


  26 in total

Review 1.  Incorporation of biomarkers in phase II studies of recurrent glioblastoma.

Authors:  Toni Rose Jue; Elizabeth Hovey; Sara Davis; Oliver Carleton; Kerrie L McDonald
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-12-23

2.  Large volume re-irradiation with bevacizumab is a feasible salvage option for patients with refractory high-grade glioma.

Authors:  Michael Back; Cecelia E Gzell; Marina Kastelan; Linxin Guo; Helen R Wheeler
Journal:  Neurooncol Pract       Date:  2014-12-15

3.  Self-assembled 20-nm (64)Cu-micelles enhance accumulation in rat glioblastoma.

Authors:  Jai Woong Seo; JooChuan Ang; Lisa M Mahakian; Sarah Tam; Brett Fite; Elizabeth S Ingham; Janine Beyer; John Forsayeth; Krystof S Bankiewicz; Ting Xu; Katherine W Ferrara
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 9.776

4.  Efficacy and safety of bevacizumab for the treatment of glioblastoma.

Authors:  Zhiyun Yu; Gang Zhao; Zhonghua Zhang; Yunqian Li; Yong Chen; Nan Wang; Zhongying Zhao; Guifang Xie
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 5.  Updates in the management of high-grade glioma.

Authors:  David Bradley; Jeremy Rees
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  Bevacizumab-containing regimen in relapsed/progressed brain tumors: a single-institution experience.

Authors:  Amalia Schiavetti; Giulia Varrasso; Maria Giovanna Mollace; Carlo Dominici; Eva Ferrara; Paola Papoff; Claudio Di Biasi
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 1.475

7.  Single-agent bevacizumab is an effective treatment in recurrent glioblastoma.

Authors:  Ilhan Hacibekiroglu; Hilmi Kodaz; Bulent Erdogan; Esma Turkmen; Melike Ozcelik; Asim Esenkaya; Haci Mehmet Saygi; Sernaz Uzunoglu; Irfan Cicin
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 3.064

8.  A retrospective observational analysis to evaluate the off-label use of bevacizumab alone or with irinotecan in recurrent glioblastoma.

Authors:  Michele Cecchi; Monica Vaiani; Marco Ceroti; Roberto Banfi
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2013-03-28

Review 9.  Nonsurgical treatment of recurrent glioblastoma.

Authors:  O Gallego
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.677

10.  Low incidence of pseudoprogression by imaging in newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients treated with cediranib in combination with chemoradiation.

Authors:  Marco C Pinho; Pavlina Polaskova; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Dominique Jennings; Kyrre E Emblem; Rakesh K Jain; Bruce R Rosen; Patrick Y Wen; A Gregory Sorensen; Tracy T Batchelor; Elizabeth R Gerstner
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013-12-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.