Literature DB >> 23046884

Structural modelling pipelines in next generation sequencing projects.

Jonathan G L Mullins1.   

Abstract

Our capacity to reliably predict protein structure from sequence is steadily improving due to the increased numbers and better targeting of protein structures being experimentally determined by structural genomics projects, along with the development of better modeling methodologies. Template-based (homology) modeling and de novo modeling methods are being combined to fill in remaining gaps in template coverage, and powerful automated structural modeling pipelines are being applied to large data sets of protein sequences. The improved quality of 3D models of proteins has led to their routine use in assessing the functional impact of nonsynonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms (nsSNPs) in specific protein systems, with the development of approaches that may be applied in a predictive fashion to nsSNPs emerging from next-generation sequencing projects. The challenges encountered in deriving functionally meaningful deductions from structural modeling can be quite different for proteins of different protein functional classes. The specific challenges to the assessment of the structural and functional impact of nsSNPs in globular proteins such as binding and regulatory proteins, structural proteins, and enzymes are discussed, as well as membrane transport proteins and ion channels. The mapping of reliable predictions of the structural and functional impact of SNPs, generated from automated modeling pipelines, on to protein-protein interaction networks will facilitate new approaches to understanding complex polygenic disorders and predisposition to disease.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23046884     DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-394287-6.00005-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Protein Chem Struct Biol        ISSN: 1876-1623            Impact factor:   3.507


  8 in total

1.  Recognizable cerebellar dysplasia associated with mutations in multiple tubulin genes.

Authors:  Renske Oegema; Thomas D Cushion; Ian G Phelps; Seo-Kyung Chung; Jennifer C Dempsey; Sarah Collins; Jonathan G L Mullins; Tracy Dudding; Harinder Gill; Andrew J Green; William B Dobyns; Gisele E Ishak; Mark I Rees; Dan Doherty
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 2.  Modelling three-dimensional protein structures for applications in drug design.

Authors:  Tobias Schmidt; Andreas Bergner; Torsten Schwede
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 7.851

3.  The arabidopsis DNA polymerase δ has a role in the deposition of transcriptionally active epigenetic marks, development and flowering.

Authors:  Francisco M Iglesias; Natalia A Bruera; Sebastián Dergan-Dylon; Cristina Marino-Buslje; Hernán Lorenzi; Julieta L Mateos; Franziska Turck; George Coupland; Pablo D Cerdán
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 5.917

4.  De novo mutations in GRIN1 cause extensive bilateral polymicrogyria.

Authors:  Andrew E Fry; Katherine A Fawcett; Nathanel Zelnik; Hongjie Yuan; Belinda A N Thompson; Lilach Shemer-Meiri; Thomas D Cushion; Hood Mugalaasi; David Sims; Neil Stoodley; Seo-Kyung Chung; Mark I Rees; Chirag V Patel; Louise A Brueton; Valérie Layet; Fabienne Giuliano; Michael P Kerr; Ehud Banne; Vardiella Meiner; Tally Lerman-Sagie; Katherine L Helbig; Laura H Kofman; Kristin M Knight; Wenjuan Chen; Varun Kannan; Chun Hu; Hirofumi Kusumoto; Jin Zhang; Sharon A Swanger; Gil H Shaulsky; Ghayda M Mirzaa; Alison M Muir; Heather C Mefford; William B Dobyns; Amanda B Mackenzie; Jonathan G L Mullins; Johannes R Lemke; Nadia Bahi-Buisson; Stephen F Traynelis; Heledd F Iago; Daniela T Pilz
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 15.255

5.  In vivo, in vitro and in silico correlations of four de novo SCN1A missense mutations.

Authors:  Andreea Nissenkorn; Yael Almog; Inbar Adler; Mary Safrin; Marina Brusel; Milit Marom; Shayel Bercovich; Daniel Yakubovich; Michal Tzadok; Bruria Ben-Zeev; Moran Rubinstein
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Caseinolytic Proteins (Clp) in the Genus Klebsiella: Special Focus on ClpK.

Authors:  Tehrim Motiwala; Blessing Oluebube Akumadu; Sbahle Zuma; Mbalenhle Sizamile Mfeka; Wanping Chen; Ikechukwu Achilonu; Khajamohiddin Syed; Thandeka Khoza
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 4.411

7.  Coenzyme Q Biosynthesis: Evidence for a Substrate Access Channel in the FAD-Dependent Monooxygenase Coq6.

Authors:  Alexandre Ismail; Vincent Leroux; Myriam Smadja; Lucie Gonzalez; Murielle Lombard; Fabien Pierrel; Caroline Mellot-Draznieks; Marc Fontecave
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  Clinical and Functional Characterization of the Recurrent TUBA1A p.(Arg2His) Mutation.

Authors:  Jennifer F Gardner; Thomas D Cushion; Georgios Niotakis; Heather E Olson; P Ellen Grant; Richard H Scott; Neil Stoodley; Julie S Cohen; Sakkubai Naidu; Tania Attie-Bitach; Maryse Bonnières; Lucile Boutaud; Férechté Encha-Razavi; Sheila M Palmer-Smith; Hood Mugalaasi; Jonathan G L Mullins; Daniela T Pilz; Andrew E Fry
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2018-08-07
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.