Dennis Ougrin1, Isabel Boege. 1. King's College London, Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, PO 85, De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, UK. dennis.ougrin@kcl.ac.uk
Abstract
The Self Harm Questionnaire (SHQ) aiming at identification of self-harm in adolescents has been developed and piloted in a sample of 12-17 year olds (n = 100). The adolescents were recruited from both in- and outpatient psychiatric services. Concurrent validity of the SHQ was evaluated by comparing the SHQ results with recorded self harm in the entire clinical records, while the predictive value of the SHQ was assessed by reviewing the clinical records for further episodes of self harm after three months. 71% of the young people endorsed self harm on the SHQ. While 3% showed a false negative result on the SHQ, 20% of the participants disclosed self harm on the SHQ, which was not recorded in their clinical records. At three months follow up there was no statistically significant difference in either sensitivity .95, 95% CI [.72, 1.0] vs. .74, 95% CI [.49, .90] or specificity .35, 95% CI [.25, .46] vs. .51, 95% CI [.39, .62] between the SHQ and the entire clinical record in predicting future episodes of self harm. The SHQ is an important addition to the clinical repertoire designed to improve identification of self harm.
The Self Harm Questionnaire (SHQ) aiming at identification of self-harm in adolescents has been developed and piloted in a sample of 12-17 year olds (n = 100). The adolescents were recruited from both in- and outpatientpsychiatric services. Concurrent validity of the SHQ was evaluated by comparing the SHQ results with recorded self harm in the entire clinical records, while the predictive value of the SHQ was assessed by reviewing the clinical records for further episodes of self harm after three months. 71% of the young people endorsed self harm on the SHQ. While 3% showed a false negative result on the SHQ, 20% of the participants disclosed self harm on the SHQ, which was not recorded in their clinical records. At three months follow up there was no statistically significant difference in either sensitivity .95, 95% CI [.72, 1.0] vs. .74, 95% CI [.49, .90] or specificity .35, 95% CI [.25, .46] vs. .51, 95% CI [.39, .62] between the SHQ and the entire clinical record in predicting future episodes of self harm. The SHQ is an important addition to the clinical repertoire designed to improve identification of self harm.
Authors: Mary K Nixon; Christine Levesque; Michèle Preyde; John Vanderkooy; Paula F Cloutier Journal: Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health Date: 2015-07-08 Impact factor: 3.033
Authors: Becky Mars; Rosie Cornish; Jon Heron; Andy Boyd; Catherine Crane; Keith Hawton; Glyn Lewis; Kate Tilling; John Macleod; David Gunnell Journal: Arch Suicide Res Date: 2016-01-20
Authors: Dennis Ougrin; Richard Corrigall; Jason Poole; Toby Zundel; Mandy Sarhane; Victoria Slater; Daniel Stahl; Paula Reavey; Sarah Byford; Margaret Heslin; John Ivens; Maarten Crommelin; Zahra Abdulla; Daniel Hayes; Kerry Middleton; Benita Nnadi; Eric Taylor Journal: Lancet Psychiatry Date: 2018-05-03 Impact factor: 27.083
Authors: Udita Iyengar; Natasha Snowden; Joan R Asarnow; Paul Moran; Troy Tranah; Dennis Ougrin Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2018-11-23 Impact factor: 4.157
Authors: Nicholas J Carson; Brian Mullin; Maria Jose Sanchez; Frederick Lu; Kelly Yang; Michelle Menezes; Benjamin Lê Cook Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-02-19 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Sarah L Rowe; Krisna Patel; Rebecca S French; Claire Henderson; Dennis Ougrin; Mike Slade; Paul Moran Journal: JMIR Ment Health Date: 2018-01-30