Literature DB >> 23046551

The North of England Survey of Twin and Multiple Pregnancy.

Svetlana V Glinianaia1, Judith Rankin, Stephen N Sturgiss, Martin P Ward Platt, Danielle Crowder, Ruth Bell.   

Abstract

The population-based Northern Survey of Twin and Multiple Pregnancy (NorSTAMP, formerly the Multiple Pregnancy Register) has collected data since 1998 on all multiple pregnancies in North of England (UK) from the earliest point of ascertainment in pregnancy. This paper updates recent developments to the NorSTAMP and presents some early mortality data from the first 10 years of data collection (1998-2007). Since 2005, mothers have been asked to give explicit consent for their identifiable data to be held by the survey, in line with changing guidance and legal frameworks for identifiable data. In 2009, regional standards of care for multiple pregnancies were developed, agreed, and disseminated. During 1998-2007, 4,865 twin maternities (pregnancies with at least one live birth or stillbirth) were registered, with an average twinning rate of 14.9 per 1,000 maternities. The overall stillbirth and neonatal mortality rates in twins were 18.0/1,000 births and 23.0/1,000 live births respectively. Stillbirth and neonatal mortality rates were significantly higher in monochorionic than dichorionic twins: 44.4 versus 12.2 per 1,000 births (relative risk [RR] 3.6, 95% Confidence Intervals [CI] 2.6-5.1), and 32.4 versus 21.4 per 1,000 live births (RR 1.5, 95% CI 1.04-2.2) respectively. There was no significant improvement during this period in either stillbirth or neonatal mortality rates in either chorionicity group. This population-based survey is an important source of data on multiple pregnancies, which allows monitoring of trends in multiple birth rates and pregnancy losses, providing essential information to support improvements in clinical care and for epidemiological research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23046551     DOI: 10.1017/thg.2012.65

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Twin Res Hum Genet        ISSN: 1832-4274            Impact factor:   1.587


  5 in total

1.  Health professionals' perspectives on bereavement following loss from a twin pregnancy: a qualitative study.

Authors:  J Richards; R H Graham; N D Embleton; J Rankin
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 2.521

2.  Challenges for better care based on the course of maternal body mass index, weight gain and multiple outcome in twin pregnancies: a population-based retrospective cohort study in Hessen/Germany within 15 years.

Authors:  Julia Schubert; Nina Timmesfeld; Kathrin Noever; Birgit Arabin
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 2.344

3.  Pregnancy outcomes before and after institution of a specialised twins clinic: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Amanda Henry; Nicole Lees; Kendall J Bein; Beverley Hall; Veronica Lim; Katie Qiao Chen; Alec W Welsh; Lisa Hui; Antonia W Shand
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Increased risk of congenital heart disease in twins in the North of England between 1998 and 2010.

Authors:  K E Best; J Rankin
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2015-09-27       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  The risk of twin pregnancies should be minimized in patients with a unicornuate uterus undergoing IVF-ET.

Authors:  Yan Ouyang; Pei Cai; Fei Gong; Ge Lin; Jiabi Qin; Xihong Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.