Literature DB >> 23046331

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound vs. CT angiography in fenestrated EVAR surveillance: a single-center comparison.

Paolo Perini1, Ibrahim Sediri, Marco Midulla, Pascal Delsart, Corinne Gautier, Stéphan Haulon.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) as an effective alternative to computed tomographic angiography (CTA) during follow-up after fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of juxtarenal aortic aneurysms.
METHODS: Between January 2008 and April 2011, 62 patients (all men; mean age 72 years) underwent fenestrated EVAR follow-up with both CTA and CEUS. In a retrospective analysis, the first CTA and CEUS postoperative examinations after EVAR were compared for endoleak detection, aneurysm sac diameter, and target vessel patency. The examinations were performed within 30 days of the procedure and the interval between the 2 scans was <7 days. Only fenestrated endografts with up to 3 fenestrations (with or without a scallop) were eligible so that the entire implant could be visualized with standard abdominal ultrasound.
RESULTS: The mean diameters of the aneurysm sac were 56.58±8.56 mm with CEUS and 57.70±8.59 mm with CTA. The mean difference in aneurysm sac diameter was -1.13±3.19 mm (95% CI -0.34 to -1.92), with CTA measurements tending to be slightly larger. Bland-Altman plots showed good agreement between the imaging modalities with respect to aneurysm sac diameter (Spearman correlation coefficient r(s)=0.921, p<0.01). Endoleaks were detected by CTA in 7 (11.3%) of 62 patients and by CEUS in 6 (9.7%). In 59 (95.16%) cases, the tests agreed, and their equivalence was confirmed by binomial distribution testing. There was complete agreement between CEUS and CTA in the assessment of target vessels (144/146 patent target arteries; 1 had a significant stenosis and another was thrombosed).
CONCLUSION: CEUS is as accurate as CTA in endoleak detection, abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter measurement, and the evaluation of target vessels during surveillance of fenestrated stent-grafts. Although it cannot yet be proposed as the only imaging modality during follow-up, CEUS could be usefully employed with the self-evident advantage of reducing lifetime exposure to ionizing radiation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23046331     DOI: 10.1583/JEVT-12-3909R.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endovasc Ther        ISSN: 1526-6028            Impact factor:   3.487


  11 in total

Review 1.  CT angiography in the diagnosis of cardiovascular disease: a transformation in cardiovascular CT practice.

Authors:  Zhonghua Sun; Mansour Al Moudi; Yan Cao
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2014-10

2.  CEUS versus CT Angiography in the follow-up of abdominal aortic endoprostheses: diagnostic accuracy and activity-based cost analysis.

Authors:  Niccolo' Faccioli; Giovanni Foti; Giulia Casagranda; Elena Santi; Mirko D'Onofrio
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  Is contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) superior to computed tomography angiography (CTA) in detection of endoleaks in post-EVAR patients? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Amer Harky; Ewa Zywicka; Giovanni Santoro; Lucas Jullian; Mihika Joshi; Sameh Dimitri
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2019-02-15

Review 4.  Ultrasonography for endoleak detection after endoluminal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Authors:  Iosief Abraha; Maria Laura Luchetta; Rita De Florio; Francesco Cozzolino; Giovanni Casazza; Piergiorgio Duca; Basso Parente; Massimiliano Orso; Antonella Germani; Paolo Eusebi; Alessandro Montedori
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-06-09

Review 5.  Contrast Ultrasound, Sonothrombolysis and Sonoperfusion in Cardiovascular Disease: Shifting to Theragnostic Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Soufiane El Kadi; Thomas R Porter; Niels J W Verouden; Albert C van Rossum; Otto Kamp
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2021-10-13

6.  Abdominal aortic aneurysm follow-up by shear wave elasticity imaging after endovascular repair in a canine model.

Authors:  Antony Bertrand-Grenier; Sophie Lerouge; An Tang; Eli Salloum; Eric Therasse; Claude Kauffmann; Hélène Héon; Igor Salazkin; Guy Cloutier; Gilles Soulez
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound after endovascular aortic repair-current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Sasan Partovi; Mathias Kaspar; Markus Aschwanden; Charles Lopresti; Shivanshu Madan; Heiko Uthoff; Stephan Imfeld; Daniel Staub
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2015-12

Review 8.  Diagnostic imaging methods applied in long-term surveillance after EVAR. Will computed tomography angiography be replaced by other methods?

Authors:  Karolina Stefaniak; Michal Stanisic; Marcin Gabriel; Grzegorz Oszkinis
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 1.426

9.  Identification of Factors Influencing Cumulative Long-Term Radiation Exposure in Patients Undergoing EVAR.

Authors:  G Kalender; Milan Lisy; U A Stock; A Endisch; A Kornberger
Journal:  Int J Vasc Med       Date:  2017-11-09

10.  The Utility of Intraoperative Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound for Immediate Treatment of Type Ia Endoleak during EVAR: Initial Experience.

Authors:  Claudio Bianchini Massoni; Paolo Perini; Mara Fanelli; Alessandro Ucci; Matteo Azzarone; Giulia Rossi; Rita Maria D'Ospina; Antonio Freyrie
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2021-05-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.