PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy and safety of balloon angioplasty (BA) with optional stenting vs. routine stenting with current open cell nitinol stents for femoropopliteal occlusive disease by analyzing the overall results from all available randomized controlled trials. METHODS: A bibliographic search of electronic medical databases (MEDLINE, Embase, ISI Web of Knowledge, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) was conducted to identify relevant articles from 1960 to July 2011. Of the 701 published articles retrieved, 17 clinical trials randomized patients with symptomatic femoropopliteal occlusive disease to either primary BA or primary stenting. Of these, 4 RCTs involved the use of currently employed high flexibility nitinol stents. Thirteen other trials that employed obsolete, steel, or coated stents were excluded. The technical success rate, the target lesion revascularization (TLR) rate, and the binary restenosis rate at 12 months were primary efficacy endpoints; mortality was the primary safety endpoint. The results are reported as the odds ratio (OR) with 2-tailed 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). RESULTS: The study population was made up of 627 patients (416 men; mean age 67±10 years) and 665 lesions (361 assigned to the primary stenting and 304 to BA). The mean length of the treated lesion was similar in both groups (74.6±45.7 mm in the stenting group vs. 66.7±41.3 mm in the BA group). Technical success was significantly higher in the stenting group compared to BA (95.8% vs. 64.2%; OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.92, p<0.001). Follow-up ranged from 12 to 24 months. Based on 3 studies, the TLR at 12 months favored the stent group (OR 2.47, 95% CI 0.72 to 8.49, p=0.065), but the difference did not reach statistical significance. However, the 12-month binary restenosis rate was significantly lower in the primary stenting group (OR 3.02, 95% CI 1.3 to 6.71, p<0.001). With respect to the safety endpoint, mortality was similar in both groups (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.77, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis supports the use of the primary stenting, mainly for long lesions, as a first-line endovascular treatment for symptomatic disease in the femoropopliteal segment, contrary to indications for use in current clinical guidelines.
PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy and safety of balloon angioplasty (BA) with optional stenting vs. routine stenting with current open cell nitinol stents for femoropopliteal occlusive disease by analyzing the overall results from all available randomized controlled trials. METHODS: A bibliographic search of electronic medical databases (MEDLINE, Embase, ISI Web of Knowledge, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) was conducted to identify relevant articles from 1960 to July 2011. Of the 701 published articles retrieved, 17 clinical trials randomized patients with symptomatic femoropopliteal occlusive disease to either primary BA or primary stenting. Of these, 4 RCTs involved the use of currently employed high flexibility nitinol stents. Thirteen other trials that employed obsolete, steel, or coated stents were excluded. The technical success rate, the target lesion revascularization (TLR) rate, and the binary restenosis rate at 12 months were primary efficacy endpoints; mortality was the primary safety endpoint. The results are reported as the odds ratio (OR) with 2-tailed 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). RESULTS: The study population was made up of 627 patients (416 men; mean age 67±10 years) and 665 lesions (361 assigned to the primary stenting and 304 to BA). The mean length of the treated lesion was similar in both groups (74.6±45.7 mm in the stenting group vs. 66.7±41.3 mm in the BA group). Technical success was significantly higher in the stenting group compared to BA (95.8% vs. 64.2%; OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.92, p<0.001). Follow-up ranged from 12 to 24 months. Based on 3 studies, the TLR at 12 months favored the stent group (OR 2.47, 95% CI 0.72 to 8.49, p=0.065), but the difference did not reach statistical significance. However, the 12-month binary restenosis rate was significantly lower in the primary stenting group (OR 3.02, 95% CI 1.3 to 6.71, p<0.001). With respect to the safety endpoint, mortality was similar in both groups (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.77, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis supports the use of the primary stenting, mainly for long lesions, as a first-line endovascular treatment for symptomatic disease in the femoropopliteal segment, contrary to indications for use in current clinical guidelines.
Authors: George A Antoniou; George S Georgiadis; Stavros A Antoniou; Ragai R Makar; Jonathan D Smout; Francesco Torella Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2017-04-03
Authors: Rafael de Athayde Soares; Marcelo Fernando Matielo; Francisco Cardoso Brochado Neto; Ana Paula Maia Pires; Rogério Duque de Almeida; Murilo de Jesus Martins; Roberto Sacilotto Journal: JRSM Cardiovasc Dis Date: 2019-02-10