Literature DB >> 23046068

The dual lens model: a comprehensive framework for understanding self-other agreement of personality judgments at zero acquaintance.

Sarah Hirschmüller1, Boris Egloff, Steffen Nestler, Mitja D Back.   

Abstract

An integrative framework for the examination of self-other agreement of personality judgments at zero acquaintance is outlined that integrates dualistic approaches to personality, behavior, and personality judgments within the Brunswikian (1956) lens model. The dual lens model (DLM) distinguishes between explicit and implicit self-concepts of personality, controlled and automatic cues, and deliberate and intuitive personality judgments. In a first application of the DLM, targets (N = 56) were videotaped during short self-introductions, and direct and indirect measures of extraversion as well as a number of physical, kinesic, vocal, and verbal cues were obtained. Perceivers judged targets' extraversion based on these short video sequences either in a global judgment condition (Study 1: N = 95) or in a deliberate versus an intuitive judgment condition (Study 2: N = 82). In both studies, results showed that extraversion judgments at zero acquaintance were correlated with both the explicit and the implicit self-concept of extraversion (self-other agreement). The self-other correlation for explicit extraversion was fully mediated by the utilization of valid controlled cues, and it was fully mediated by the utilization of valid automatic cues for the implicit self. Whereas judgment condition did not moderate self-other agreement, perceivers' intuitive judgment style was associated with higher levels of self-other agreement, a relation that could be explained by DLM analyses. Results underline the utility of the proposed framework for the study of interpersonal judgments. (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23046068     DOI: 10.1037/a0030383

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  8 in total

1.  Using Cross-Classified Structural Equation Models to Examine the Accuracy of Personality Judgments.

Authors:  Steffen Nestler; Mitja D Back
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 2.500

Review 2.  Only complementary voices tell the truth: a reevaluation of validity in multi-informant approaches of child and adolescent clinical assessments.

Authors:  Aleksandra Kaurin; Boris Egloff; Argyris Stringaris; Michèle Wessa
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 3.575

3.  Set the tone: Trustworthy and dominant novel voices classification using explicit judgement and machine learning techniques.

Authors:  Cyrielle Chappuis; Didier Grandjean
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  Prospects for direct social perception: a multi-theoretical integration to further the science of social cognition.

Authors:  Travis J Wiltshire; Emilio J C Lobato; Daniel S McConnell; Stephen M Fiore
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Still facial photographs of long-term meditators are perceived by naïve observers as less neurotic, more conscientious and more mindful than non-meditating controls.

Authors:  Simon B Goldberg; Matthew Hirshberg; Lawrence Y Tello; Helen Y Weng; Lisa Flook; Richard J Davidson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Nonverbal pre-performance expressions of professional darts players distinguish between good and poor performance.

Authors:  Philip Furley; Florian Klingner; Daniel Memmert
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Translating personality psychology to help personalize preventive medicine for young adult patients.

Authors:  Salomon Israel; Terrie E Moffitt; Daniel W Belsky; Robert J Hancox; Richie Poulton; Brent Roberts; W Murray Thomson; Avshalom Caspi
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2014-03

8.  Path Models of Vocal Emotion Communication.

Authors:  Tanja Bänziger; Georg Hosoya; Klaus R Scherer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.