Literature DB >> 23044901

Auditory brainstem implants: how do they work?

C Vincent1.   

Abstract

This review covers the design, structure, and function of auditory brainstem implants. Auditory brainstem implants (ABIs) are auditory prostheses initially designed to treat deafness in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2). NF2 typically results in deafness due to disruption of the cochlear nerves. When the tumors are removed the auditory nerve is usually cut or nonfunctional anymore. In these cases, patients cannot benefit from peripheral devices such as cochlear implants (CI). Another cause of VIII nerve loss is bilateral temporal bone fracture. Worldwide, more than 500 persons have received an ABI after removal of the tumors that occur with NF2. More recently, some extensions of indications have been proposed to include subjects who would not benefit enough from a cochlear implant (i.e. cochlear ossification). The ABI is similar in design and function to a CI, except that the electrode is placed on the first auditory relay station in the brainstem, the cochlear nucleus (CN). The ABI electrode array is a small paddle that contains plate electrode contacts. The CN has not a single linear tonotopic organization from base to apex like the cochlea but different tonotopic subunits. The CN comprises multiple neuron types that are characterized by specific properties (morphology, regional distribution and cell-membrane characteristics), synaptic input and responses to acoustic stimuli. As the ABI electrode array is placed along the surface of the CN, each electrode likely activates a variety of neuron types, possibly with different characteristic frequencies. Patients undergoing ABI have variable benefit with regard to sound and speech comprehension. For the majority of patients, this improvement is essentially obtained by an augmentation of lip reading performances. Speech comprehension without lip-reading is not as good as with cochlear implants.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23044901     DOI: 10.1002/ar.22588

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)        ISSN: 1932-8486            Impact factor:   2.064


  5 in total

1.  Auditory Brainstem Implant Array Position Varies Widely Among Adult and Pediatric Patients and Is Associated With Perception.

Authors:  Samuel R Barber; Elliott D Kozin; Aaron K Remenschneider; Sidharth V Puram; Max Smith; Barbara S Herrmann; Mary E Cunnane; M Christian Brown; Daniel J Lee
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Conducting polymer electrodes for auditory brainstem implants.

Authors:  Amélie A Guex; Nicolas Vachicouras; Ariel E Hight; M Christian Brown; Daniel J Lee; Stéphanie P Lacour
Journal:  J Mater Chem B       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 6.331

3.  Auditory brainstem stimulation with a conformable microfabricated array elicits responses with tonotopically organized components.

Authors:  Amélie A Guex; Ariel Edward Hight; Shreya Narasimhan; Nicolas Vachicouras; Daniel J Lee; Stéphanie P Lacour; M Christian Brown
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Effects of Electrical Stimulation in the Inferior Colliculus on Frequency Discrimination by Rhesus Monkeys and Implications for the Auditory Midbrain Implant.

Authors:  Daniel S Pages; Deborah A Ross; Vanessa M Puñal; Shruti Agashe; Isaac Dweck; Jerel Mueller; Warren M Grill; Blake S Wilson; Jennifer M Groh
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 5.  Clinical and scientific innovations in auditory brainstem implants.

Authors:  Kunal R Shetty; Sarah E Ridge; Vivek Kanumuri; Angela Zhu; M Christian Brown; Daniel J Lee
Journal:  World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2021-04-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.