Literature DB >> 23044857

Readability assessment of the American Rhinologic Society patient education materials.

Khushabu Kasabwala1, Poonam Misra, David R Hansberry, Nitin Agarwal, Soly Baredes, Michael Setzen, Jean Anderson Eloy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The extensive amount of medical literature available on the Internet is frequently accessed by patients. To effectively contribute to healthcare decision-making, these online resources should be worded at a level that is readable by any patient seeking information. The American Medical Association and National Institutes of Health recommend the readability of patient information material should be between a 4th to 6th grade level. In this study, we evaluate the readability of online patient education information available from the American Rhinologic Society (ARS) website using 9 different assessment tools that analyze the materials for reading ease and grade level of the target audience.
METHODS: Online patient education material from the ARS was downloaded in February 2012 and assessed for level of readability using the Flesch Reading Ease, Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) Grading, Coleman-Liau Index, Gunning-Fog Index, FORCAST formula, Raygor Readability Estimate, the Fry Graph, and the New Dale-Chall Readability Formula. Each article was pasted as plain text into a Microsoft® Word® document and each subsection was analyzed using the software package Readability Studio Professional Edition Version 2012.1.
RESULTS: All healthcare education materials assessed were written between a 9th grade and graduate reading level and were considered "difficult" to read by the assessment scales.
CONCLUSION: Online patient education materials on the ARS website are written above the recommended 6th grade level and may require revision to make them easily understood by a broader audience.
© 2013 ARS-AAOA, LLC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23044857     DOI: 10.1002/alr.21097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol        ISSN: 2042-6976            Impact factor:   3.858


  7 in total

1.  Are we effectively informing patients? A quantitative analysis of on-line patient education resources from the American Society of Neuroradiology.

Authors:  D R Hansberry; N Agarwal; S F Gonzales; S R Baker
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Evaluation of internet-based patient education materials from internal medicine subspecialty organizations: will patients understand them?

Authors:  David R Hansberry; Nitin Agarwal; Elizabeth S John; Ann M John; Prateek Agarwal; James C Reynolds; Stephen R Baker
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 3.397

Review 3.  Readability of patient education materials in ophthalmology: a single-institution study and systematic review.

Authors:  Andrew M Williams; Kelly W Muir; Jullia A Rosdahl
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 2.209

4.  Readability and quality assessment of internet-based patient education materials related to nasal septoplasty.

Authors:  Elysia M Grose; Connor P Holmes; Kaishan A Aravinthan; Vincent Wu; John M Lee
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2021-03-17

5.  Internet-Based Patient Education Materials Regarding Diabetic Foot Ulcers: Readability and Quality Assessment.

Authors:  David Michael Lee; Elysia Grose; Karen Cross
Journal:  JMIR Diabetes       Date:  2022-01-11

6.  Patient information in Graves' disease and thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy: readability assessment of online resources.

Authors:  Matthew R Edmunds; Alastair K Denniston; Kristien Boelaert; Jayne A Franklyn; Omar M Durrani
Journal:  Thyroid       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 6.568

7.  Readability of the American, Canadian, and British Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Societies' Patient Materials.

Authors:  Joo Hyun Kim; Elysia Grose; Justine Philteos; David Forner; Christopher W Noel; Vincent Wu; Antoine Eskander
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 5.591

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.