Literature DB >> 23044846

[A pilot study for handling errors in psychotherapy - therapists report from practical experience].

Irina Medau1, Ralf J Jox, Volker Dittmann, Stella Reiter-Theil.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the views of psychotherapists regarding management of treatment errors by reviewing and analyzing interviews with therapists.
METHODS: A literature search was used to identify topics for the interview guide. Semi-structured interviews with 30 psychotherapists were conducted and analyzed according to qualitative content analysis, a framework approach.
RESULTS: Psychotherapists report an open approach to handling treatment errors: the majority claim that they would discuss errors with their patients. Experiences with error disclosure were on the whole rather positive. Errors of colleagues would be discussed in a supervisory way or, in more serious cases, be reported.
CONCLUSION: In psychotherapy, a constructive and open handling of errors seems to prevail. Therapists tend to be cautious when judging errors of colleagues. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23044846     DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1305192

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatr Prax        ISSN: 0303-4259


  1 in total

1.  How psychotherapists handle treatment errors -- an ethical analysis.

Authors:  Irina Medau; Ralf J Jox; Stella Reiter-Theil
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 2.652

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.