Literature DB >> 23044360

The midwifery miniCEX--a valuable clinical assessment tool for midwifery education.

Linda P Sweet1, Pauline Glover, Tracey McPhee.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Midwifery students, clinicians and educators in Australia identified the need for improved feedback for midwifery students whilst they are on clinical placement; in particular formative assessment. The miniCEX or mini-clinical evaluation exercise is one approach to assessment that has been proven valid and reliable in medical education. The aim of this research was to develop, implement and evaluate a miniCEX tool for midwifery education.
METHODS: Using an action research approach, this project engaged midwifery clinicians and midwifery students to adapt and implement the miniCEX in a postnatal ward environment. Focus groups were held to establish the clinical expectations and develop performance guidelines of students across the domains of midwifery practice, as well as evaluate their use in practice.
FINDINGS: Evaluation of the midwifery miniCEX, including its applicability from the perspective of staff and students was positive. The miniCEX was found to be easy to use, time efficient and valuable for learning. DISCUSSION: The miniCEX is an innovative approach to assessment and feedback in midwifery education, and there is currently no identified evidence of its use in midwifery education despite broad use globally in medical education.
CONCLUSION: The implementation of the midwifery miniCEX offers broad benefit to both midwifery students and midwifery clinicians and educators globally.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23044360     DOI: 10.1016/j.nepr.2012.08.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurse Educ Pract        ISSN: 1471-5953            Impact factor:   2.281


  1 in total

1.  The educational impact of Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX) and Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS) and its association with implementation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andrea C Lörwald; Felicitas-Maria Lahner; Zineb M Nouns; Christoph Berendonk; John Norcini; Robert Greif; Sören Huwendiek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.