Literature DB >> 23044088

Working memory of somatosensory stimuli: an fMRI study.

Nicoletta Savini1, Marcella Brunetti, Claudio Babiloni, Antonio Ferretti.   

Abstract

In a previous study, we have shown that passive recognition of tactile geometrical shapes (i.e. no exploratory movement) engages prefrontal and premotor areas in addition to somatosensory regions (Savini et al., 2010). In the present study we tested the hypothesis that these regions are involved not only in the perception but also during working memory of such somatic information. We performed functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during the execution of N-BACK tasks, with 2D geometrical shapes blindly pressed on the subjects' right hand palm. Three conditions with increasing memory load (0-BACK, 1-BACK, 2-BACK) were used. Results showed that primary somatosensory area (SI), secondary somatosensory area (SII) and bilateral Insula were active in all conditions, confirming their importance in coding somatosensory stimuli. Activation of fronto-parietal circuit in supplementary motor area (SMA), right superior parietal lobe (rSPL), bilateral middle frontal gyrus, left inferior frontal gyrus, and right superior frontal sulcus was significantly larger during 1-BACK and 2-BACK than 0-BACK. Left superior parietal lobe and right frontal eye field showed a higher activation during the 2-BACK than 0-BACK. Finally, SMA and rSPL were characterized by a statistically significant higher activation during 2-BACK than 1-BACK, revealing their sensitivity to the memory load. These results suggest that working memory of tactile geometrical shapes (no exploratory movement) involves a complex circuit of modal and supramodal fronto-parietal areas.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23044088     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.09.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol        ISSN: 0167-8760            Impact factor:   2.997


  4 in total

1.  Prefrontal activity predicts individual differences in optimal attentional strategy for preventing motor performance decline: a functional near-infrared spectroscopy study.

Authors:  Takeshi Sakurada; Aya Goto; Masayuki Tetsuka; Takeshi Nakajima; Mitsuya Morita; Shin-Ichiroh Yamamoto; Masahiro Hirai; Kensuke Kawai
Journal:  Neurophotonics       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 3.593

2.  Low-arousal speech noise improves performance in N-back task: an ERP study.

Authors:  Longzhu Han; Yunzhe Liu; Dandan Zhang; Yi Jin; Yuejia Luo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Shared neural representations of tactile roughness intensities by somatosensation and touch observation using an associative learning method.

Authors:  Junsuk Kim; Isabelle Bülthoff; Sung-Phil Kim; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Individual Optimal Attentional Strategy in Motor Learning Tasks Characterized by Steady-State Somatosensory and Visual Evoked Potentials.

Authors:  Takeshi Sakurada; Masataka Yoshida; Kiyoshi Nagai
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 3.169

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.