Literature DB >> 23043845

Evidence for horizontal and vertical transmission in Campylobacter passage from hen to her progeny.

N A Cox1, L J Richardson, J J Maurer, M E Berrang, P J Fedorka-Cray, R J Buhr, J A Byrd, M D Lee, C L Hofacre, P M O'Kane, A M Lammerding, A G Clark, S G Thayer, M P Doyle.   

Abstract

Campylobacter is an important human pathogen, and consumption of undercooked poultry has been linked to significant human illnesses. To reduce human illness, intervention strategies targeting Campylobacter reduction in poultry are in development. For more than a decade, there has been an ongoing national and international controversy about whether Campylobacter can pass from one generation of poultry to the next via the fertile egg. We recognize that there are numerous sources of Campylobacter entry into flocks of commercial poultry (including egg transmission), yet the environment is often cited as the only source. There has been an abundance of published research globally that refutes this contention, and this article lists and discusses many of them, along with other studies that support environment as the sole or primary source. One must remember that egg passage can mean more than vertical, transovarian transmission. Fecal bacteria, including Campylobacter, can contaminate the shell, shell membranes, and albumen of freshly laid fertile eggs. This contamination is drawn through the shell by temperature differential, aided by the presence of moisture (the "sweating" of the egg); then, when the chick emerges from the egg, it can ingest bacteria such as Campylobacter, become colonized, and spread this contamination to flock mates in the grow house. Improvements in cultural laboratory methods continue to advance our knowledge of the ecology of Campylobacter, and in the not-so-distant future, egg passage will not be a subject continuously debated but will be embraced, thus allowing the development and implementation of more effective intervention strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23043845     DOI: 10.4315/0362-028.JFP-11-322

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Food Prot        ISSN: 0362-028X            Impact factor:   2.077


  22 in total

1.  On-farm Campylobacter and Escherichia coli in commercial broiler chickens: Re-used bedding does not influence Campylobacter emergence and levels across sequential farming cycles.

Authors:  H N Chinivasagam; W Estella; H Rodrigues; D G Mayer; C Weyand; T Tran; A Onysk; I Diallo
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Microbial Infections Are Associated with Embryo Mortality in Arctic-Nesting Geese.

Authors:  Cristina M Hansen; Brandt W Meixell; Caroline Van Hemert; Rebekah F Hare; Karsten Hueffer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Efficacy of protein, symbiotic and probiotic supplementation on production performance and egg quality characteristics in molted layers.

Authors:  Haseeb Anwar; Zia Ur Rahman
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 1.559

4.  Parallel Sequencing Reveals Campylobacter spp. in Commercial Meat Chickens Less than 8 Days Old.

Authors:  F M Colles; S J Hedges; R Dixon; S G Preston; P Thornhill; K K Barfod; S G Gebhardt-Henrich; P Créach; M C J Maiden; M S Dawkins; A L Smith
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Analysis of Campylobacter jejuni Subtype Distribution in the Chicken Broiler Production Continuum: a Longitudinal Examination To Identify Primary Contamination Points.

Authors:  G Douglas Inglis; Nahal Ramezani; Eduardo N Taboada; Valerie F Boras; Richard R E Uwiera
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Intestinal Microbiota of Broiler Chickens As Affected by Litter Management Regimens.

Authors:  Lingling Wang; Mike Lilburn; Zhongtang Yu
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 7.  A systematic review characterizing on-farm sources of Campylobacter spp. for broiler chickens.

Authors:  Agnes Agunos; Lisa Waddell; David Léger; Eduardo Taboada
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Influence of commercial laying hen housing systems on the incidence and identification of Salmonella and Campylobacter.

Authors:  D R Jones; J Guard; R K Gast; R J Buhr; P J Fedorka-Cray; Z Abdo; J R Plumblee; D V Bourassa; N A Cox; L L Rigsby; C I Robison; P Regmi; D M Karcher
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Microbiological impact of three commercial laying hen housing systems.

Authors:  D R Jones; N A Cox; J Guard; P J Fedorka-Cray; R J Buhr; R K Gast; Z Abdo; L L Rigsby; J R Plumblee; D M Karcher; C I Robison; R A Blatchford; M M Makagon
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 10.  Campylobacter: from microbiology to prevention.

Authors:  A Facciolà; R Riso; E Avventuroso; G Visalli; S A Delia; P Laganà
Journal:  J Prev Med Hyg       Date:  2017-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.