Literature DB >> 23043524

National surveillance for radiological exposures and intentional potassium iodide and iodine product ingestions in the United States associated with the 2011 Japan radiological incident.

Royal K Law1, Josh G Schier, Colleen A Martin, Dagny E Olivares, Richard G Thomas, Alvin C Bronstein, Arthur S Chang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In March of 2011, an earthquake struck Japan causing a tsunami that resulted in a radiological release from the damaged Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant. Surveillance for potential radiological and any iodine/iodide product exposures was initiated on the National Poison Data System (NPDS) to target public health messaging needs within the United States (US). Our objectives are to describe self-reported exposures to radiation, potassium iodide (KI) and other iodine/iodide products which occurred during the US federal response and discuss its public health impact.
METHODS: All calls to poison centers associated with the Japan incident were identified from March 11, 2011 to April 18, 2011 in NPDS. Exposure, demographic and health outcome information were collected. Calls about reported radiation exposures and KI or other iodine/iodide product ingestions were then categorized with regard to exposure likelihood based on follow-up information obtained from the PC where each call originated. Reported exposures were subsequently classified as probable exposures (high likelihood of exposure), probable non-exposures (low likelihood of exposure), and suspect exposure (unknown likelihood of exposure).
RESULTS: We identified 400 calls to PCs associated with the incident, with 340 information requests (no exposure reported) and 60 reported exposures. The majority (n = 194; 57%) of the information requests mentioned one or more substances. Radiation was inquired about most frequently (n = 88; 45%), followed by KI (n = 86; 44%) and other iodine/iodide products (n = 47; 24%). Of the 60 reported exposures, KI was reported most frequently (n = 25; 42%), followed by radiation (n = 22; 37%) and other iodine/iodide products (n = 13; 22%). Among reported KI exposures, most were classified as probable exposures (n = 24; 96%); one was a probable non-exposure. Among reported other iodine/iodide product exposures, most were probable exposures (n = 10, 77%) and the rest were suspect exposures (n = 3; 23%). The reported radiation exposures were classified as suspect exposures (n = 16, 73%) or probable non-exposures (n = 6; 27%). No radiation exposures were classified as probable exposures. A small number of the probable exposures to KI and other iodide/iodine products reported adverse signs or symptoms (n = 9; 26%). The majority of probable exposures had no adverse outcomes (n = 28; 82%). These data identified a potential public health information gap regarding KI and other iodine/iodide products which was then addressed through public health messaging activities.
CONCLUSION: During the Japan incident response, surveillance activities using NPDS identified KI and other iodine/iodide products as potential public health concerns within the US, which guided CDC's public health messaging and communication activities. Regional PCs can provide timely and additional information during a public health emergency to enhance data collected from surveillance activities, which in turn can be used to inform public health decision-making.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23043524      PMCID: PMC4568985          DOI: 10.3109/15563650.2012.732701

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Toxicol (Phila)        ISSN: 1556-3650            Impact factor:   4.467


  3 in total

1.  Using poison center data for national public health surveillance for chemical and poison exposure and associated illness.

Authors:  Amy F Wolkin; Colleen A Martin; Royal K Law; Josh G Schier; Alvin C Bronstein
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 5.721

2.  Early detection of illness associated with poisonings of public health significance.

Authors:  Amy F Wolkin; Manish Patel; William Watson; Martin Belson; Carol Rubin; Joshua Schier; Edwin M Kilbourne; Carol Gotway Crawford; Wendy Wattigney; Toby Litovitz
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2005-12-27       Impact factor: 5.721

3.  Iodide prophylaxis in Poland after the Chernobyl reactor accident: benefits and risks.

Authors:  Janusz Nauman; Jan Wolff
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.965

  3 in total
  5 in total

Review 1.  On the role of poison centers in radiation emergency preparedness and response activities: findings of the "Radiation Emergencies Public Health Roundtable" (Atlanta, GA-August 2012).

Authors:  A C Pomerleau; J L Schauben; A C Bronstein; A S Chang
Journal:  J Med Toxicol       Date:  2014-03

2.  The role of toxicologists and poison centers during and after a nuclear power plant emergency.

Authors:  Z N Kazzi; C W Miller
Journal:  Clin Toxicol (Phila)       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.467

Review 3.  Emergency department management of patients internally contaminated with radioactive material.

Authors:  Ziad Kazzi; Jennifer Buzzell; Luiz Bertelli; Doran Christensen
Journal:  Emerg Med Clin North Am       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 2.264

4.  Using poison center data for postdisaster surveillance.

Authors:  Amy Wolkin; Amy H Schnall; Royal Law; Joshua Schier
Journal:  Prehosp Disaster Med       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 2.040

Review 5.  Medical Therapy of Patients Contaminated with Radioactive Cesium or Iodine.

Authors:  Jan Aaseth; Valeria Marina Nurchi; Ole Andersen
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2019-12-11
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.