Literature DB >> 23043068

The laboratory and the new oral anticoagulants.

Armando Tripodi1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The new oral anticoagulants (NOAs) dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban have proved effective and safe when used in clinical trials, without a need to adjust the dose in response to laboratory testing. This demonstrated efficacy does not necessarily mean that the laboratory, considered the mainstay for the management of the old anticoagulants, will no longer play a role in treatment with NOAs. CONTENT: Laboratories are involved in the management of anticoagulants in 2 ways. The first, monitoring, implies laboratory testing to assess the drug's effect and to adjust the dosage to maintain anticoagulation within the therapeutic interval. This consideration applies to the old drugs. The second way, measurement, implies laboratory evaluations of drug effect to determine whether patients are under- or over-anticoagulated, information that can be useful for decision-making in special circumstances. The latter applies to NOAs.
SUMMARY: Measurements of the effect of NOAs are indicated in several situations: (a) patients with adverse events (i.e., thrombotic/hemorrhagic), particularly those who present with overdosage owing to excessive drug intake or decreased clearance; (b) patients undergoing surgical procedures for ensuring that no residual drug remains in the circulation; (c) patients requiring anticoagulation reversal because of life-threatening hemorrhage; (d) patients with renal insufficiency, who are likely to accumulate the drug in the circulation; (e) patients with liver failure, because NOAs are metabolized by the liver; (f) patients taking other drugs that might increase/decrease the effects of NOAs via drug-drug interactions. The choice of tests is based on such characteristics as availability, linearity of the dose-response curve, standardization, and responsiveness to increasing drug dosage. Practitioners need to be aware that NOAs can interfere with the measurement of common hemostasis parameters.
© 2012 American Association for Clinical Chemistry

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23043068     DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2012.189704

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem        ISSN: 0009-9147            Impact factor:   8.327


  11 in total

Review 1.  The vexed question of whether or not to measure levels of direct oral anticoagulants before surgery or invasive procedures.

Authors:  Armando Tripodi; Francesco Marongiu; Marco Moia; Gualtiero Palareti; Vittorio Pengo; Daniela Poli; Domenico Prisco; Sophie Testa; Maria Zanazzi
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 3.397

2.  Laboratory tests during direct oral anticoagulant treatment? No.

Authors:  Giovanni Di Minno; Elena Ricciardi; Antonella Scalera
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 3.397

3.  Monitoring of low dabigatran concentrations: diagnostic performance at clinically relevant decision thresholds.

Authors:  Florian Härtig; Sven Poli; Matthias Ebner; Ingvild Birschmann; Joachim Kuhn; Ulf Ziemann; Hans-Ulrich Häring; Rainer Lehmann; Andreas Peter; Sebastian Hörber
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 2.300

4.  [New oral anticoagulants in perioperative medicine].

Authors:  A Giebl; K Gürtler
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  Evaluation of coagulation assays versus LC-MS/MS for determinations of dabigatran concentrations in plasma.

Authors:  Jovan P Antovic; Mika Skeppholm; Jaak Eintrei; Elisabet Eriksson Boija; Lisbeth Söderblom; Eva-Marie Norberg; Liselotte Onelöv; Yuko Rönquist-Nii; Anton Pohanka; Olof Beck; Paul Hjemdahl; Rickard E Malmström
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 2.953

6.  Dabigatran: patient management in specific clinical settings.

Authors:  Paul Alexander Kyrle; Konrad Binder; Sabine Eichinger; Reinhold Függer; Bernd Gollackner; J Michael Hiesmayr; Kurt Huber; Wielfried Lang; Peter Perger; Peter Quehenberger; Franz X Roithinger; Sabine Schmaldienst; Ansgar Weltermann; Hans Domanovits
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 1.704

7.  Comparison of different laboratory tests in the evaluation of hemorrhagic risk of patients using rivaroxaban in the critical care setting: diagnostic accuracy study.

Authors:  Marjorie Paris Colombini; Priscilla Bento Matos Cruz Derogis; Valdir Fernandes de Aranda; João Carlos de Campos Guerra; Nelson Hamerschlak; Cristóvão Luis Pitangueiras Mangueira
Journal:  Thromb J       Date:  2017-08-15

8.  Lead thrombus under standard-dose edoxaban in a patient with normal to high creatinine clearance and protein S deficiency.

Authors:  Wei-Chieh Lee; Min-Ping Huang
Journal:  Thromb J       Date:  2021-07-17

Review 9.  Management of anticoagulant-related intracranial hemorrhage: an evidence-based review.

Authors:  Bappaditya Ray; Salah G Keyrouz
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Evaluation of the DOAC-Stop Procedure by LC-MS/MS Assays for Determining the Residual Activity of Dabigatran, Rivaroxaban, and Apixaban.

Authors:  L Slavik; J Jacova; D Friedecky; J Ulehlova; Z Tauber; J Prochazkova; A Hlusi; M Palova
Journal:  Clin Appl Thromb Hemost       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 2.389

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.