Literature DB >> 23042979

Beliefs about chlamydia testing amongst young people living in relatively deprived areas.

A R Booth1, P R Harris, E Goyder, P Norman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study uses the theory of planned behaviour (TPB) as a framework to investigate salient beliefs about chlamydia testing, amongst young people living in relatively deprived areas. These beliefs may form targets for intervention to increase testing in this high-risk population.
METHODS: Participants recruited from colleges in deprived areas of a UK city, completed open-ended questions designed to elicit salient beliefs. Responses were content analysed and categorized as describing behavioural, normative or control beliefs.
RESULTS: Beliefs were elicited from 128 respondents (51% male; median age = 17). The commonest behavioural belief, which could have a positive or negative impact on screening intentions, was that testing provides information about health status. Partners were referred to most commonly amongst the normative beliefs. Practical aspects and concerns about social implications of testing were common control beliefs. References to several negative emotions emerged throughout.
CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that raising awareness of chlamydia as a serious sexual health problem may not be the best way to increase the uptake of testing in a high-risk population. Promoting chlamydia testing as potentially providing reassurance may be an alternative. It may also be important to reduce perceptions of social disapproval as well as negative emotion regarding chlamydia testing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  beliefs; genitourinary diseases; screening

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23042979     DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fds082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)        ISSN: 1741-3842            Impact factor:   2.341


  5 in total

1.  Exploring access and attitudes to regular sexually transmitted infection screening: the views of young, multi-ethnic, inner-city, female students.

Authors:  Rebecca Normansell; Vari M Drennan; Pippa Oakeshott
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Recommendation on screening for chlamydia and gonorrhea in primary care for individuals not known to be at high risk.

Authors:  Ainsley Moore; Gregory Traversy; Donna L Reynolds; John J Riva; Guylène Thériault; Brenda J Wilson; Melissa Subnath; Brett D Thombs
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Web-based chlamydia education for university students: A pilot project.

Authors:  Nancy G Russell; Phyllis W Sharps; Elizabeth Sloand
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2022-05-28

4.  Predictors of Chlamydia Trachomatis testing: perceived norms, susceptibility, changes in partner status, and underestimation of own risk.

Authors:  Gill A Ten Hoor; Robert A C Ruiter; Jan E A M van Bergen; Christian J P A Hoebe; Nicole H T M Dukers-Muijrers; Gerjo Kok
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Young people's preferences for the use of emerging technologies for asymptomatic regular chlamydia testing and management: a discrete choice experiment in England.

Authors:  Sue Eaton; Deborah Biggerstaff; Stavros Petrou; Leeza Osipenko; Jo Gibbs; Claudia S Estcourt; Tariq Sadiq; Ala Szczepura
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.