Literature DB >> 23042196

Glycocalyx degradation causes microvascular perfusion failure in the ex vivo perfused mouse lung: hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 pretreatment attenuates this response.

Mike Sebastian Strunden1, Anika Bornscheuer, Anke Schuster, Rainer Kiefmann, Alwin E Goetz, Kai Heckel.   

Abstract

The endothelial glycocalyx (GLX) is pivotal to vascular barrier function. We investigated the consequences of GLX degradation on pulmonary microvascular perfusion and, prompted by evidence that hydroxyethyl starch (HES) improves microcirculation, studied the effects of two HES preparations during GLX diminution. C57 BL/6 black mice lungs were explanted and perfused with 1-mL/min buffer solution containing autologous erythrocytes (red blood cells) at a hematocrit of 5%. Microvessel perfusion was quantified by video fluorescence microscopy at 0 and 90 min. To register interstitial edema, alveolar septal width was quantified. Pulmonary artery pressure (PAP), airway pressure, and left atrial pressure were recorded continuously. Lungs were randomly assigned to four groups (each n = 5): (i) control: no treatment, (ii) HEP1: heparinase I (1 mU/mL) was injected for GLX degradation, (iii) HES 130, and (iv) HES 200: one third of perfusion fluid was exchanged for 6% HES 130/0.4 or 10% HES 200/0.5 before GLX degradation. Analysis of variance on ranks and pairwise multiple comparisons were used for statistics, P < 0.05. Compared with control, GLX degradation effected perfusion failure in microvessels, increased PAP, and facilitated interstitial edema formation after a 90-min period of perfusion. In contrast to HES 200/0.5, pretreatment with HES 130/0.4 attenuated all of these consequences. Sequelae of GLX degradation in lung include perfusion failure in microvessels, interstitial edema formation, and increase in PAP. We assume that these effects are a consequence of vascular barrier dysfunction. Beneficial effects of HES 130/0.4 are presumably a result of its lower red blood cell bridging capacity compared with HES 200/0.5.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23042196     DOI: 10.1097/SHK.0b013e31826f2583

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Shock        ISSN: 1073-2322            Impact factor:   3.454


  7 in total

1.  Effects of crystalloids and colloids on microcirculation, central venous oxygen saturation, and central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide gap in a rabbit model of hemorrhagic shock.

Authors:  Makiko Komori; Yuriko Samejima; Keiko Okamura; Junko Ichikawa; Mitsuharu Kodaka; Keiko Nishiyama; Yasuko Tomizawa
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 2.  THE GLYCOCALYX AND TRAUMA: A REVIEW.

Authors:  Andreia Z Chignalia; Feliz Yetimakman; Sarah C Christiaans; Sule Unal; Benan Bayrakci; Brant M Wagener; Robert T Russell; Jeffrey D Kerby; Jean-Francois Pittet; Randal O Dull
Journal:  Shock       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.454

Review 3.  Implications of recent accumulating knowledge about endothelial glycocalyx on anesthetic management.

Authors:  Ghada M N Bashandy
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 2.078

4.  Has goal directed fluid therapy and glycocalyx a role in enhanced recovery after anesthesia?

Authors:  Abdelazeem Eldawlatly
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec

5.  Endothelial Glycocalyx Shedding Occurs during Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Timothy M Sladden; Stephanie Yerkovich; Douglas Wall; Maxine Tan; William Hunt; Jonathan Hill; Ian Smith; Peter Hopkins; Daniel C Chambers
Journal:  J Transplant       Date:  2019-08-25

Review 6.  Nanomechanics of vascular endothelium.

Authors:  Johannes Fels; Pia Jeggle; Ivan Liashkovich; Wladimir Peters; Hans Oberleithner
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 5.249

Review 7.  Glycocalyx and its involvement in clinical pathophysiologies.

Authors:  Akira Ushiyama; Hanae Kataoka; Takehiko Iijima
Journal:  J Intensive Care       Date:  2016-09-08
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.