Literature DB >> 23041562

The slope of the psychometric function and non-stationarity of thresholds in spatiotemporal contrast vision.

Stuart A Wallis1, Daniel H Baker, Tim S Meese, Mark A Georgeson.   

Abstract

The slope of the two-interval, forced-choice psychometric function (e.g. the Weibull parameter, β) provides valuable information about the relationship between contrast sensitivity and signal strength. However, little is known about how or whether β varies with stimulus parameters such as spatiotemporal frequency and stimulus size and shape. A second unresolved issue concerns the best way to estimate the slope of the psychometric function. For example, if an observer is non-stationary (e.g. their threshold drifts between experimental sessions), β will be underestimated if curve fitting is performed after collapsing the data across experimental sessions. We measured psychometric functions for 2 experienced observers for 14 different spatiotemporal configurations of pulsed or flickering grating patches and bars on each of 8 days. We found β≈3 to be fairly constant across almost all conditions, consistent with a fixed nonlinear contrast transducer and/or a constant level of intrinsic stimulus uncertainty (e.g. a square law transducer and a low level of intrinsic uncertainty). Our analysis showed that estimating a single β from results averaged over several experimental sessions was slightly more accurate than averaging multiple estimates from several experimental sessions. However, the small levels of non-stationarity (SD≈0.8dB) meant that the difference between the estimates was, in practice, negligible.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23041562     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2012.09.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  11 in total

1.  Application of Correlation-Based Scoring Scheme for Visual Acuity Measurements in the Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Csilla Fülep; Illés Kovács; Kinga Kránitz; Zoltán Zsolt Nagy; Gábor Erdei
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 3.283

2.  Observation of time-dependent psychophysical functions and accounting for threshold drifts.

Authors:  Robert J Doll; Peter H Veltink; Jan R Buitenweg
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Effects of Spatial Frequency Similarity and Dissimilarity on Contour Integration.

Authors:  Malte Persike; Günter Meinhardt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Four theorems on the psychometric function.

Authors:  Keith A May; Joshua A Solomon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The mechanism of short-term monocular deprivation is not simple: separate effects on parallel and cross-oriented dichoptic masking.

Authors:  Alex S Baldwin; Robert F Hess
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Synergy of spatial frequency and orientation bandwidth in texture segregation.

Authors:  Cordula Hunt; Günter Meinhardt
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Grid-texture mechanisms in human vision: Contrast detection of regular sparse micro-patterns requires specialist templates.

Authors:  Daniel H Baker; Tim S Meese
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Temporal information loss in the macaque early visual system.

Authors:  Gregory D Horwitz
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 9.593

9.  Differential impact of exogenous and endogenous attention on the contrast sensitivity function across eccentricity.

Authors:  Michael Jigo; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Psychophysics with children: Investigating the effects of attentional lapses on threshold estimates.

Authors:  Catherine Manning; Pete R Jones; Tessa M Dekker; Elizabeth Pellicano
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.