OBJECTIVE: Infection during mechanical circulatory support is a frequent adverse complication. We analyzed infections occurring in this population in a national tertiary care center, and assessed the differences existing between the setting of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and ventricular assist devices (VADs). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: An observational study was made of patients treated with ECMO or VAD in the San Raffaele Scientific Institute (Italy) between 2009 and 2011. INTERVENTIONS: None. RESULTS: Thirty-nine percent of the 46 patients with ECMO and 69% of the 15 patients with VAD developed infection. We observed a mortality rate of 36.1% during mechanical circulatory support and of 55.7% during the global hospitalization period. Although Gram-negative infections were predominant overall, patients with ECMO were more prone to develop Candida infection (29%), and patients with VAD tended to suffer Staphylococcus infection (18%). Patients with infection had longer ECMO support (p=0.03), VAD support (p=0.01), stay in the intensive care unit (p=0.002), and hospital admission (p=0.03) than patients without infection. Infection (regression coefficient=3.99, 95% CI 0.93-7.05, p=0.02), body mass index (regression coefficient=0.46, 95% CI 0.09-0.83, p=0.02), fungal infection (regression coefficient=4.96, 95% CI 1.42-8.44, p=0.009) and obesity (regression coefficient=10.47, 95% CI 1.77-19.17, p=0.02) were predictors of the duration of ECMO support. Stepwise logistic regression analysis showed the SOFA score at the time of implant (OR=12.33, 95% CI 1.15-132.36, p=0.04) and VAD (OR=1.27, 95% CI 1.04-1.56, p=0.02) to be associated with infection. CONCLUSIONS: Infection is a major challenge during ECMO and VAD support. Each mechanical circulatory support configuration is associated with specific pathogens; fungal infections play a major role.
OBJECTIVE:Infection during mechanical circulatory support is a frequent adverse complication. We analyzed infections occurring in this population in a national tertiary care center, and assessed the differences existing between the setting of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and ventricular assist devices (VADs). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: An observational study was made of patients treated with ECMO or VAD in the San Raffaele Scientific Institute (Italy) between 2009 and 2011. INTERVENTIONS: None. RESULTS: Thirty-nine percent of the 46 patients with ECMO and 69% of the 15 patients with VAD developed infection. We observed a mortality rate of 36.1% during mechanical circulatory support and of 55.7% during the global hospitalization period. Although Gram-negative infections were predominant overall, patients with ECMO were more prone to develop Candida infection (29%), and patients with VAD tended to suffer Staphylococcus infection (18%). Patients with infection had longer ECMO support (p=0.03), VAD support (p=0.01), stay in the intensive care unit (p=0.002), and hospital admission (p=0.03) than patients without infection. Infection (regression coefficient=3.99, 95% CI 0.93-7.05, p=0.02), body mass index (regression coefficient=0.46, 95% CI 0.09-0.83, p=0.02), fungal infection (regression coefficient=4.96, 95% CI 1.42-8.44, p=0.009) and obesity (regression coefficient=10.47, 95% CI 1.77-19.17, p=0.02) were predictors of the duration of ECMO support. Stepwise logistic regression analysis showed the SOFA score at the time of implant (OR=12.33, 95% CI 1.15-132.36, p=0.04) and VAD (OR=1.27, 95% CI 1.04-1.56, p=0.02) to be associated with infection. CONCLUSIONS:Infection is a major challenge during ECMO and VAD support. Each mechanical circulatory support configuration is associated with specific pathogens; fungal infections play a major role.
Authors: Dong Wan Kim; Hye Ju Yeo; Seong Hoon Yoon; Seung Eun Lee; Su Jin Lee; Woo Hyun Cho; Doo Soo Jeon; Yun Seong Kim; Bong Soo Son; Do Hyung Kim Journal: J Artif Organs Date: 2015-12-31 Impact factor: 1.731
Authors: Oleg Epelbaum; Eva M Carmona; Scott E Evans; Chadi A Hage; Benjamin Jarrett; Kenneth S Knox; Andrew H Limper; Kelly M Pennington Journal: ASAIO J Date: 2021-06-01 Impact factor: 3.826
Authors: Taressa Bull; Amanda Corley; Danielle J Smyth; David J McMillan; Kimble R Dunster; John F Fraser Journal: Intensive Care Med Exp Date: 2018-03-12
Authors: Darryl Abrams; Giacomo Grasselli; Matthieu Schmidt; Thomas Mueller; Daniel Brodie Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2019-11-25 Impact factor: 41.787
Authors: I Rodriguez-Goncer; S Thomas; P Foden; M D Richardson; A Ashworth; J Barker; C G Geraghty; E G Muldoon; T W Felton Journal: Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Date: 2018-04-06 Impact factor: 3.267