Literature DB >> 23040274

[Not Available].

Pablo Simón Lorda1, Inés María Barrio Cantalejo, Francisco J Alarcos Martínez, Javier Barbero Gutiérrez, Azucena Couceiro, Pablo Hernando Robles.   

Abstract

The debate about the "right to die with dignity" will only be productive if the words used are constructed properly. "Euthanasia" is probably the word that most needs further clarification. This word is frequently abused and still remains unclear. Five scenarios around end-of-life care can be highlighted: euthanasia and assisted suicide, withholding or withdrawal of life sustaining therapies, refusal of treatment or withdrawal of consent, palliative sedation and withdrawal of treatment because of patient death. This work supports the hypothesis that Spanish society has reached a sufficient ethical and legal consensus on the lastfour scenarios, which should never been considered "euthanasia" but forms of dignified death and good clinical practice. So, the mainstream of the Spanish debate on the "right to die" should not be based on these four scenarios but on the first, the question of "euthanasia and assisted suicide", which remain open to further discussion.
Copyright © 2008 Sociedad Española de Calidad Asistencial. Published by Elsevier Espana. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 23040274     DOI: 10.1016/S1134-282X(08)75035-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Calid Asist        ISSN: 1134-282X


  1 in total

1.  [Ethical arguments for and against the participation of the medical profession in assisted death: analysis of the Ethics Department of the Chilean Medical Association].

Authors:  SofÍa P Salas; Rodrigo A Salinas; Mauricio Besio; Constanza Micolich; AnamarÍa Arriagada; Adelio Misseroni Raddatz; Carlos Y Valenzuela; Fernando Novoa; Gladys BÓrquez EstefÓ
Journal:  Rev Med Chil       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 0.553

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.