Literature DB >> 23040141

Feasibility and acceptability of routine human immunodeficiency virus testing in general practice: your views.

Sumeet Hindocha1, Thomas Charlton, Michael Rayment, Nick Theobald.   

Abstract

Early diagnosis of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) leads to a decreased morbidity and mortality. General practice offers an important window for earlier diagnosis. The British HIV Association produced guidelines in 2008 advocating an increase in HIV testing, with specific references to primary care. This study explores the awareness of, and opinions towards, these guidelines within general practice. An email questionnaire was sent to 191 general practitioners nationwide, in both areas of high and low HIV prevalence. A total of 80 doctors replied, giving a response rate of 42%. In all, 44% of the respondents were unaware of the guidelines and 89% felt comfortable discussing and carrying out an HIV test themselves; of the 11% that did not, all but one were from low prevalence areas (P = 0.037). Respondents felt that main barrier to HIV testing was patient acceptability. Having read the guidelines, 70% believed it would be feasible to follow them in practice. Those who disagreed felt that time implications were the most important reason not to adopt the guidelines. Almost half the respondents were not aware of the guidelines; having read them, the majority felt that implementation is feasible. This demonstrates the necessity for better dissemination of these guidelines. This study found that the main barrier to performing an HIV test was felt to be patient acceptance, a contradiction to findings from recent pilot studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23040141     DOI: 10.1017/S1463423612000436

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prim Health Care Res Dev        ISSN: 1463-4236            Impact factor:   1.458


  6 in total

1.  A novel strategy to reduce very late HIV diagnosis in high-prevalence areas in South-West England: serious incident audit.

Authors:  J Womack; E Herieka; M Gompels; S Callaghan; E Burt; C F Davies; M T May; N O'Brien; J Macleod
Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 2.341

2.  Qualitative impact assessment of an educational workshop on primary care practitioner attitudes to NICE HIV testing guidelines.

Authors:  Rosalie L Allison; Ellie J Ricketts; Thomas Hartney; Anthony Nardone; Katy Town; Claire Rugman; Kate Folkard; J Kevin Dunbar; Cliodna Am McNulty
Journal:  BJGP Open       Date:  2018-04-07

3.  HIV testing strategies employed in health care settings in the European Union/European Economic Area (EU/EEA): evidence from a systematic review.

Authors:  S Desai; L Tavoschi; A K Sullivan; L Combs; D Raben; V Delpech; S F Jakobsen; A J Amato-Gauci; S Croxford
Journal:  HIV Med       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 3.180

Review 4.  HIV Testing Uptake According to Opt-In, Opt-Out or Risk-Based Testing Approaches: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Qi Rui Soh; Leon Y J Oh; Eric P F Chow; Cheryl C Johnson; Muhammad S Jamil; Jason J Ong
Journal:  Curr HIV/AIDS Rep       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 5.495

Review 5.  HIV testing within general practices in Europe: a mixed-methods systematic review.

Authors:  Jessika Deblonde; Dominique Van Beckhoven; Jasna Loos; Nicole Boffin; André Sasse; Christiana Nöstlinger; Virginie Supervie
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Identifying key elements to inform HIV-testing interventions for primary care in Belgium.

Authors:  Hanne Apers; Christiana Nöstlinger; Dominique Van Beckhoven; Jessika Deblonde; Ludwig Apers; Katleen Verheyen; Jasna Loos
Journal:  Health Promot Int       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 2.483

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.