Literature DB >> 23040122

The price of emergency contraception in the United States: what is the cost-effectiveness of ulipristal acetate versus single-dose levonorgestrel?

Lisa L Bayer1, Alison B Edelman, Aaron B Caughey, Maria I Rodriguez.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ulipristal acetate (UPA) is a novel form of emergency contraception (EC) that appears to be more effective than the prevailing method, single-dose levonorgestrel (LNG). This study examines the cost-efficacy of UPA compared with LNG. STUDY
DESIGN: A decision-analytic model was developed to compare the cost-effectiveness of UPA versus LNG in preventing unintended pregnancy when taken within 120 h of unprotected intercourse. Univariate and bivariate sensitivity analyses, as well as Monte Carlo simulation and threshold analyses, were performed.
RESULTS: Utilizing UPA instead of LNG would result in 37,589 fewer unintended pregnancies per 4,176,572 estimated US annual EC uses (UPA 54,295 pregnancies; LNG 91,884 pregnancies) and a societal savings of $116.3 million annually. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curve analyses suggest a 96% probability that UPA is more cost-effective at a willingness to pay $100,000 per quality-adjusted life year.
CONCLUSIONS: UPA is cost-effective in preventing unintended pregnancy after unprotected intercourse. Efforts should be promoted to increase access to UPA.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23040122     DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.08.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  8 in total

1.  Use of ulipristal acetate and levonorgestrel for emergency contraception: a follow-up study.

Authors:  Aisling Susan Baird; James Trussell; Anne Webb
Journal:  J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care       Date:  2014-05-28

2.  From Kaua'i to Hawai'i Island: Interisland Differences in Emergency Contraceptive Pill Availability.

Authors:  Holly Bullock; Mary Tschann; Jennifer Elia; Bliss Kaneshiro; Jennifer Salcedo
Journal:  Hawaii J Med Public Health       Date:  2017-07

3.  Pharmacy access to ulipristal acetate in Hawaii: is a prescription enough?

Authors:  Holly Bullock; Sarah Steele; Nicole Kurata; Mary Tschann; Jennifer Elia; Bliss Kaneshiro; Jennifer Salcedo
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 3.375

4.  Survey of emergency physicians regarding emergency contraception.

Authors:  Marc A Probst; Michelle P Lin; Lindsey G Lawrence; Erin Robey-Gavin; Leslie S Pendery; Reuben J Strayer
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 2.469

Review 5.  Evaluating Cost-effectiveness of Interventions That Affect Fertility and Childbearing: How Health Effects Are Measured Matters.

Authors:  Jeremy D Goldhaber-Fiebert; Margaret L Brandeau
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 2.749

6.  The Cost-Effectiveness of Emergency Hormonal Contraception with Ulipristal Acetate versus Levonorgestrel for Minors in France.

Authors:  Ramona Schmid
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Re-Evaluating the Possible Increased Risk of HIV Acquisition With Progestin-Only Injectables Versus Maternal Mortality and Life Expectancy in Africa: A Decision Analysis.

Authors:  Maria Isabel Rodriguez; Mary E Gaffield; Leo Han; Aaron B Caughey
Journal:  Glob Health Sci Pract       Date:  2017-12-28

8.  Emergency contraception subsidy in Canada: a comparative policy analysis.

Authors:  Sabrina C Lee; Wendy V Norman
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 2.908

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.