Literature DB >> 23039633

4D patient dose reconstruction using online measured EPID cine images for lung SBRT treatment validation.

Mu-Han Lin1, Jinsheng Li, Lu Wang, Sion Koren, Jiajing Fan, Eugene Forkal, C-M Ma.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aims to develop an EPID-guided 4D patient dose reconstruction framework and to investigate its feasibility for lung SBRT treatment validation.
METHODS: Both the beam apertures and tumor movements were detected based on the continuously acquired EPID images during the treatment. Instead of directly using the transit photon fluence measured by the EPID, this method reconstructed the entrance fluence with the measured beam apertures and the delivered MUs. The entrance fluence distributions were sorted into their corresponding phases based on the detected tumor motion pattern and then accumulated for each phase. Together with the in-room 4DCT taken before every treatment to consider the interfractional-motion, the entrance fluence was then used for the patient dose calculation. Deformable registration was performed to sum up the phase doses for final treatment assessment. The feasibility of using the transit EPID images for entrance fluence reconstruction was evaluated against EPID in-air measurements. The accuracy of 3D- and 4D-dose reconstruction was validated by experiments with a motor-driven cylindrical diode array for six clinical-SBRT plans.
RESULTS: The average difference between the measured and reconstructed fluence maps was within 0.16%. The reconstructed 3D-dose showed a less than 1.4% difference for the CAX-dose and at least a 98.3% gamma-passing-rate (2%∕2 mm) for the peripheral dose. Distorted dose distributions were observed in the measurement with the moving phantom. The comparison between the measured and the reconstructed 4D-dose without considering temporal information failed the gamma-evaluation for most cases. In contrast, when temporal information was considered, the dose distortion phenomena were successfully represented in the reconstructed dose (97.6%-99.7% gamma-passing rate).
CONCLUSIONS: The proposed method considered uncertainties of the beam delivery system, the interfractional- and intrafractional-motion, and the interplay effect. The experimental validation demonstrates that this method is practical and accurate for online or offline SBRT patient dose verification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23039633     DOI: 10.1118/1.4748505

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  6 in total

1.  Camera selection for real-time in vivo radiation treatment verification systems using Cherenkov imaging.

Authors:  Jacqueline M Andreozzi; Rongxiao Zhang; Adam K Glaser; Lesley A Jarvis; Brian W Pogue; David J Gladstone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Time and frequency to observe fiducial markers in MLC-modulated fields during prostate IMRT/VMAT beam delivery.

Authors:  Qianqian Xu; Xu Tong; Muhan Lin; Xiaoming Chen; Ahmed ElDib; Teh Lin; Lili Chen; C-M Charlie Ma
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 2.685

3.  Assessing the dosimetric impact of real-time prostate motion during volumetric modulated arc therapy.

Authors:  Juan Diego Azcona; Lei Xing; Xin Chen; Karl Bush; Ruijiang Li
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Anatomy-based, patient-specific VMAT QA using EPID or MLC log files.

Authors:  Dewayne L Defoor; Luis A Vazquez-Quino; Panayiotis Mavroidis; Nikos Papanikolaou; Sotirios Stathakis
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Validation of a GPU-Based 3D dose calculator for modulated beams.

Authors:  Saeed Ahmed; Dylan Hunt; Jeff Kapatoes; Robert Hayward; Geoffrey Zhang; Eduardo G Moros; Vladimir Feygelman
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  A hybrid volumetric dose verification method for single-isocenter multiple-target cranial SRS.

Authors:  Saeed Ahmed; Jeff Kapatoes; Geoffrey Zhang; Eduardo G Moros; Vladimir Feygelman
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 2.102

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.