Literature DB >> 23039589

Improved coarse-graining of Markov state models via explicit consideration of statistical uncertainty.

Gregory R Bowman1.   

Abstract

Markov state models (MSMs)--or discrete-time master equation models--are a powerful way of modeling the structure and function of molecular systems like proteins. Unfortunately, MSMs with sufficiently many states to make a quantitative connection with experiments (often tens of thousands of states even for small systems) are generally too complicated to understand. Here, I present a bayesian agglomerative clustering engine (BACE) for coarse-graining such Markov models, thereby reducing their complexity and making them more comprehensible. An important feature of this algorithm is its ability to explicitly account for statistical uncertainty in model parameters that arises from finite sampling. This advance builds on a number of recent works highlighting the importance of accounting for uncertainty in the analysis of MSMs and provides significant advantages over existing methods for coarse-graining Markov state models. The closed-form expression I derive here for determining which states to merge is equivalent to the generalized Jensen-Shannon divergence, an important measure from information theory that is related to the relative entropy. Therefore, the method has an appealing information theoretic interpretation in terms of minimizing information loss. The bottom-up nature of the algorithm likely makes it particularly well suited for constructing mesoscale models. I also present an extremely efficient expression for bayesian model comparison that can be used to identify the most meaningful levels of the hierarchy of models from BACE.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23039589      PMCID: PMC3477182          DOI: 10.1063/1.4755751

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Phys        ISSN: 0021-9606            Impact factor:   3.488


  26 in total

1.  A point-charge force field for molecular mechanics simulations of proteins based on condensed-phase quantum mechanical calculations.

Authors:  Yong Duan; Chun Wu; Shibasish Chowdhury; Mathew C Lee; Guoming Xiong; Wei Zhang; Rong Yang; Piotr Cieplak; Ray Luo; Taisung Lee; James Caldwell; Junmei Wang; Peter Kollman
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.376

2.  EMMA: A Software Package for Markov Model Building and Analysis.

Authors:  Martin Senne; Benjamin Trendelkamp-Schroer; Antonia S J S Mey; Christof Schütte; Frank Noé
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 6.006

3.  Heterogeneity even at the speed limit of folding: large-scale molecular dynamics study of a fast-folding variant of the villin headpiece.

Authors:  Daniel L Ensign; Peter M Kasson; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2007-09-29       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Coarse master equations for peptide folding dynamics.

Authors:  Nicolae-Viorel Buchete; Gerhard Hummer
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 2.991

5.  The relative entropy is fundamental to multiscale and inverse thermodynamic problems.

Authors:  M Scott Shell
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 3.488

6.  Probability distributions of molecular observables computed from Markov models.

Authors:  Frank Noé
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2008-06-28       Impact factor: 3.488

7.  Bayesian comparison of Markov models of molecular dynamics with detailed balance constraint.

Authors:  Sergio Bacallado; John D Chodera; Vijay Pande
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 3.488

8.  Constructing multi-resolution Markov State Models (MSMs) to elucidate RNA hairpin folding mechanisms.

Authors:  Xuhui Huang; Yuan Yao; Gregory R Bowman; Jian Sun; Leonidas J Guibas; Gunnar Carlsson; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  Pac Symp Biocomput       Date:  2010

9.  Enhanced modeling via network theory: Adaptive sampling of Markov state models.

Authors:  Gregory R Bowman; Daniel L Ensign; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 6.006

10.  A Bayesian method for construction of Markov models to describe dynamics on various time-scales.

Authors:  Emily K Rains; Hans C Andersen
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 3.488

View more
  15 in total

1.  Percolation-like phase transitions in network models of protein dynamics.

Authors:  Jeffrey K Weber; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2015-06-07       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Variational cross-validation of slow dynamical modes in molecular kinetics.

Authors:  Robert T McGibbon; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Perspective: Markov models for long-timescale biomolecular dynamics.

Authors:  C R Schwantes; R T McGibbon; V S Pande
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2014-09-07       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Hierarchical Markov State Model Building to Describe Molecular Processes.

Authors:  David K Wolfe; Joseph R Persichetti; Ajeet K Sharma; Phillip S Hudson; H Lee Woodcock; Edward P O'Brien
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 6.006

5.  Simulation Study of the Plasticity of k-Turn Motif in Different Environments.

Authors:  Haomiao Zhang; Haozhe Zhang; Changjun Chen
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  A new class of enhanced kinetic sampling methods for building Markov state models.

Authors:  Arti Bhoutekar; Susmita Ghosh; Swati Bhattacharya; Abhijit Chatterjee
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2017-10-21       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 7.  Protein Function Analysis through Machine Learning.

Authors:  Chris Avery; John Patterson; Tyler Grear; Theodore Frater; Donald J Jacobs
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2022-09-06

8.  Elucidation of the Dynamics of Transcription Elongation by RNA Polymerase II using Kinetic Network Models.

Authors:  Lu Zhang; Fátima Pardo-Avila; Ilona Christy Unarta; Peter Pak-Hang Cheung; Guo Wang; Dong Wang; Xuhui Huang
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 22.384

9.  Quantitative comparison of alternative methods for coarse-graining biological networks.

Authors:  Gregory R Bowman; Luming Meng; Xuhui Huang
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2013-09-28       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 10.  Markov state models of biomolecular conformational dynamics.

Authors:  John D Chodera; Frank Noé
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 6.809

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.