Literature DB >> 23039574

Comparing live to recorded speech in training the perception of spectrally shifted noise-vocoded speech.

Andrew Faulkner1, Stuart Rosen, Tim Green.   

Abstract

Two experimental groups were trained for 2 h with live or recorded speech that was noise-vocoded and spectrally shifted and was from the same text and talker. These two groups showed equivalent improvements in performance for vocoded and shifted sentences, and the group trained with recorded speech showed consistently greater improvements than untrained controls. Another group trained with unshifted noise-vocoded speech improved no more than untrained controls. Computer-based training thus appears at least as effective as labor-intensive live-voice training for improving the perception of spectrally shifted noise-vocoded speech, and by implication, for training of users of cochlear implants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23039574     DOI: 10.1121/1.4754432

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  3 in total

1.  Lexico-semantic and acoustic-phonetic processes in the perception of noise-vocoded speech: implications for cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Carolyn McGettigan; Stuart Rosen; Sophie K Scott
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-25

2.  Computer-Based Connected-Text Training of Speech-in-Noise Perception for Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Tim Green; Andrew Faulkner; Stuart Rosen
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

3.  Individual Variability in Recalibrating to Spectrally Shifted Speech: Implications for Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Michael L Smith; Matthew B Winn
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.562

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.