Literature DB >> 23039315

Reciprocal modulation of internal and external factors determines individual movements.

Jodie Martin1, Bram van Moorter, Eloy Revilla, Pierrick Blanchard, Stéphane Dray, Pierre-Yves Quenette, Dominique Allainé, Jon E Swenson.   

Abstract

Movement is fundamental to individual and population dynamics, as it allows individuals to meet their basic requirements. Although movement patterns reflect interactions between internal and external factors, only few studies have examined the effects of these factors on movement simultaneously, and they generally focused on particular biological contexts (e.g. dispersal, foraging). However, the relative importance of these factors in driving individual routine movements might reflect a species' potential flexibility to cope with landscape changes and therefore buffer their potential impact on fitness. We used data from GPS collars on Scandinavian brown bears to investigate the relative role of these factors, as well as an additional factor (period of the year) on routine movements at two spatial scales (hourly and daily relocations). As expected, internal factors played a major role in driving movement, compared to external factors at both scales, but its relative importance was greater at a finer scale. In particular, the interaction between reproductive status and period of the year was one of the most influential variables, females being constrained by the movement capacity of their cubs in the first periods of the year. The effect of human disturbance on movement was also greater for females with cubs than for lone females. This study showed how reciprocal modulation of internal and external factors is shaping space use of brown bears. We stress that these factors should be studied simultaneously to avoid the risk of obtaining context-dependent inferences. Moreover, the study of their relative contribution is also highly relevant in the context of multiple-use landscapes, as human activities generally affect the landscape more than they affect the internal states of an individual. Species or individuals with important internal constraints should be less responsive to changes in their environment as they have less freedom from internal constraints and should thus be more sensitive to human alteration of the landscape, as shown for females with cubs in this study.
© 2012 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2012 British Ecological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ursus arctos; animal movements; movement ecology; spatial ecology; spatial scales

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23039315     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2012.02038.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  15 in total

1.  Quantifying space use of breeders and floaters of a long-lived species using individual movement data.

Authors:  Vincenzo Penteriani; Maria del Mar Delgado; Letizia Campioni
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2015-04-07

2.  Staying cool in a changing landscape: the influence of maximum daily ambient temperature on grizzly bear habitat selection.

Authors:  Karine E Pigeon; Etienne Cardinal; Gordon B Stenhouse; Steeve D Côté
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-04-16       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Deriving Animal Behaviour from High-Frequency GPS: Tracking Cows in Open and Forested Habitat.

Authors:  Nelleke de Weerd; Frank van Langevelde; Herman van Oeveren; Bart A Nolet; Andrea Kölzsch; Herbert H T Prins; W Fred de Boer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Landscape fragmentation and pollinator movement within agricultural environments: a modelling framework for exploring foraging and movement ecology.

Authors:  Sean A Rands
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Factors affecting date of implantation, parturition, and den entry estimated from activity and body temperature in free-ranging brown bears.

Authors:  Andrea Friebe; Alina L Evans; Jon M Arnemo; Stéphane Blanc; Sven Brunberg; Günther Fleissner; Jon E Swenson; Andreas Zedrosser
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Quantifying drivers of wild pig movement across multiple spatial and temporal scales.

Authors:  Shannon L Kay; Justin W Fischer; Andrew J Monaghan; James C Beasley; Raoul Boughton; Tyler A Campbell; Susan M Cooper; Stephen S Ditchkoff; Steve B Hartley; John C Kilgo; Samantha M Wisely; A Christy Wyckoff; Kurt C VerCauteren; Kim M Pepin
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 3.600

7.  Male reproductive strategy explains spatiotemporal segregation in brown bears.

Authors:  Sam M J G Steyaert; Jonas Kindberg; Jon E Swenson; Andreas Zedrosser
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 5.091

8.  Infanticide as a male reproductive strategy has a nutritive risk effect in brown bears.

Authors:  S M J G Steyaert; C Reusch; S Brunberg; J E Swenson; K Hackländer; A Zedrosser
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 3.703

9.  Litter loss triggers estrus in a nonsocial seasonal breeder.

Authors:  Sam Mjg Steyaert; Jon E Swenson; Andreas Zedrosser
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Sexual-size dimorphism modulates the trade-off between exploiting food and wind resources in a large avian scavenger.

Authors:  Pablo A E Alarcón; Juan M Morales; José A Donázar; José A Sánchez-Zapata; Fernando Hiraldo; Sergio A Lambertucci
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.