Literature DB >> 23039076

Bone tissue response to implant surfaces functionalized with phosphate-containing polymers.

Marcio Vivan Cardoso1, Amol Chaudhari, Yasuhiro Yoshida, Bart Van Meerbeek, Ignace Naert, Joke Duyck.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Inorganic polyphosphates are said to stimulate the activity of osteoblast-like cells in vitro. The purpose of this study was to evaluate in vivo bone regeneration around implants treated with polyphosphoric acid (PPA) and phosphorylated pullulan (PPL).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two types of implants with different surface roughness (R1: Sa ≈ 0.23 μm; R2: Sa ≈ 1.35 μm) were treated with three solutions (distilled water, 10%wt PPA, or 10%wt PPL) prior to implantation in both tibia of twelve female white rabbits. Each animal received six implants randomly positioned according to their surface roughness and treatment: R1 + water; R1 + PPA; R1 + PPL; R2 + water; R2 + PPA; R2 + PPL. Animals were sacrificed after 1 or 4 weeks, and samples were prepared for histological and histomorphometrical analysis. Bone regeneration areas were evaluated for bone-to-implant contact (BIC) and bone fraction (BF) in areas 100 and 500 μm remote from the implant surface. Data were statistically analyzed by means of Friedman and Wilcoxon matched-pair tests (P < 0.05).
RESULTS: After 1 week, bone tissue was rarely formed in the regeneration areas. After 4 weeks, implants treated with PPA presented higher ratios of BIC (R1 = 52.3 ± 13.1; R2 = 54.6 ± 11.0) than the ones treated with water (R1 = 24.1 ± 15.1; R2 = 32.4 ± 13.0). On the other hand, around the implant surface (100 μm), PPL-treated implants induced higher BF (R1 = 78.3 ± 34.1; R2 = 71.2 ± 21.8) as compared with the water-treated ones (R1 = 46.1 ± 22.0; R2 = 49.6 ± 21.0). At 500 μm, however, no statistically significant differences in BF were found among the groups evaluated (P > 0.05). Surface roughness influenced neither BIC nor BF.
CONCLUSIONS: Implant surface treatment with phosphate-containing polymers may positively influence osseointegration.
© 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Entities:  

Keywords:  implant roughness; osseointegration; surface characterization; surface functionalization; titanium

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23039076     DOI: 10.1111/clr.12053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  3 in total

1.  Biofunctionalization with a TGFβ-1 Inhibitor Peptide in the Osseointegration of Synthetic Bone Grafts: An In Vivo Study in Beagle Dogs.

Authors:  Andrea Cirera; Maria Cristina Manzanares; Pablo Sevilla; Monica Ortiz-Hernandez; Pablo Galindo-Moreno; Javier Gil
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 3.623

2.  The effect of implants loaded with stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth on early osseointegration in a canine model.

Authors:  Xu Cao; Caiyun Wang; Dingxiang Yuan; Su Chen; Xin Wang
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 3.747

3.  Implant functionalization with mesoporous silica: A promising antibacterial strategy, but does such an implant osseointegrate?

Authors:  Katleen Vandamme; Karin Thevissen; Marcelo F Mesquita; Ruxandra-Gabriella Coropciuc; Jimoh Agbaje; Patrick Thevissen; Wander José da Silva; Jozef Vleugels; Kaat De Cremer; Evelien Gerits; Johan A Martens; Jan Michiels; Bruno P A Cammue; Annabel Braem
Journal:  Clin Exp Dent Res       Date:  2020-12-31
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.